Skip to content

Cherry pick #83930 to 25.7: Revert "add assertion that checksums.txt is consistent"#83937

Merged
robot-clickhouse-ci-1 merged 2 commits intobackport/25.7/83930from
cherrypick/25.7/83930
Jul 17, 2025
Merged

Cherry pick #83930 to 25.7: Revert "add assertion that checksums.txt is consistent"#83937
robot-clickhouse-ci-1 merged 2 commits intobackport/25.7/83930from
cherrypick/25.7/83930

Conversation

@robot-clickhouse-ci-1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Original pull-request #83930

Do not merge this PR manually

This pull-request is a first step of an automated backporting.
It contains changes similar to calling git cherry-pick locally.
If you intend to continue backporting the changes, then resolve all conflicts if any.
Otherwise, if you do not want to backport them, then just close this pull-request.

The check results does not matter at this step - you can safely ignore them.

Troubleshooting

If the conflicts were resolved in a wrong way

If this cherry-pick PR is completely screwed by a wrong conflicts resolution, and you want to recreate it:

  • delete the pr-cherrypick label from the PR
  • delete this branch from the repository

You also need to check the Original pull-request for pr-backports-created label, and delete if it's presented there

The PR source

The PR is created in the CI job

@robot-clickhouse-ci-1 robot-clickhouse-ci-1 added pr-cherrypick Cherry-pick of merge-commit before backporting. Do not use manually - automated use only! do not test disable testing on pull request labels Jul 17, 2025
@robot-clickhouse-ci-1 robot-clickhouse-ci-1 merged commit 2cd20a0 into backport/25.7/83930 Jul 17, 2025
67 of 69 checks passed
@robot-clickhouse-ci-1 robot-clickhouse-ci-1 deleted the cherrypick/25.7/83930 branch July 17, 2025 17:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do not test disable testing on pull request pr-cherrypick Cherry-pick of merge-commit before backporting. Do not use manually - automated use only!

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants