Conversation
|
Sorry, but I think "sharding" kinda is overused. I would name it buckets or baskets. |
|
Ok, we can rename shards to buckets in that case. |
|
This is an automated comment for commit af55627 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running ❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page
Successful checks
|
|
Dear @CurtizJ, this PR hasn't been updated for a while. Will you continue working on it? If not, please close it. Otherwise, ignore this message. |
2 similar comments
|
Dear @CurtizJ, this PR hasn't been updated for a while. Will you continue working on it? If not, please close it. Otherwise, ignore this message. |
|
Dear @CurtizJ, this PR hasn't been updated for a while. Will you continue working on it? If not, please close it. Otherwise, ignore this message. |
|
Dear @CurtizJ, this PR hasn't been updated for a while. Will you continue working on it? If not, please close it. Otherwise, ignore this message. |
|
Dear @CurtizJ, this PR hasn't been updated for a while. Will you continue working on it? If not, please close it. Otherwise, ignore this message. |
|
Is the plan for the number of shards/buckets to be a constant, or dynamic based on the number of keys? If so, maybe #78373 could be implemented completely by this PR instead of requiring anything new? |
|
Dear @CurtizJ, this PR hasn't been updated for a while. Will you continue working on it? If not, please close it. Otherwise, ignore this message. |
2 similar comments
|
Dear @CurtizJ, this PR hasn't been updated for a while. Will you continue working on it? If not, please close it. Otherwise, ignore this message. |
|
Dear @CurtizJ, this PR hasn't been updated for a while. Will you continue working on it? If not, please close it. Otherwise, ignore this message. |
|
Maybe it will be implemented on top of shared data of |
|
Implementing a map via JSON storage (dynamic sybcolumns; shared-data, either sharded or Advanced), but without the front-end overhead and restrictions of JSON (e.g. UTF-8, #75017; Variant/Dynamic typing) would be ideal for lots of Observability use cases I have. It's a bit unfortunate that the innovative storage and the JSON front-end are so tightly coupled, or at least that the former isn't reusable. (tracked in #78373) |
Yes, the idea is exactly about that. |
|
For those who subscubed to this PR, there is a new implementation for automatic buckets in Map type: #99200 |
Changelog category (leave one):
Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):
TBD
Documentation entry for user-facing changes