-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
chore: add this month in forest reminder #6288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughAdds automation to create a monthly "This Month in Forest" reminder issue: a new Markdown checklist template and a GitHub Actions workflow that dispatches (manual) and runs monthly (1st) to create an issue from that template. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Scheduler as Cron (GitHub Actions)
participant Workflow as Workflow Dispatcher
participant Runner as Actions Runner (ubuntu-24.04-arm)
participant Action as create-an-issue@v2
participant GitHub as GitHub Issues API / Repo
Scheduler->>Workflow: Trigger on 1st of month / manual dispatch
Workflow->>Runner: Start job (checkout repo)
Runner->>Action: Invoke create-an-issue with template path + GITHUB_TOKEN
Action->>GitHub: POST issue (template content -> new issue)
GitHub-->>Action: Issue created (response)
Action-->>Runner: Success/Failure status
Runner-->>Workflow: Job completes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (1)📓 Common learnings⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/this-month-in-forest-reminder.yml (1)
9-9: Rename the job to reflect its actual purpose.The job name
checkpoint_issueappears to be copy-pasted from another workflow and is misleading. It should reflect that this job creates a monthly reminder issue.Consider renaming the job to something more descriptive:
- checkpoint_issue: + create_reminder_issue:Or alternatively, if aligning with Forest conventions, use a name like
create_forest_reminder_issue.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/THIS_MONTH_IN_FOREST_REMINDER_TEMPLATE.md(1 hunks).github/workflows/this-month-in-forest-reminder.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: LesnyRumcajs
Repo: ChainSafe/forest PR: 5907
File: src/rpc/methods/state.rs:523-570
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T15:44:33.467Z
Learning: LesnyRumcajs prefers to rely on BufWriter's Drop implementation for automatic flushing rather than explicit flush() calls in Forest codebase.
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/THIS_MONTH_IN_FOREST_REMINDER_TEMPLATE.md
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...lish it to the [Forest announcements on Github Discussions](https://github.com/ChainSa...
(GITHUB)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
- GitHub Check: Build Ubuntu
- GitHub Check: Build MacOS
- GitHub Check: cargo-publish-dry-run
- GitHub Check: tests-release
- GitHub Check: tests
- GitHub Check: All lint checks
- GitHub Check: Build forest binaries on Linux AMD64
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/this-month-in-forest-reminder.yml (2)
10-10: Verify the runner choice is appropriate for this workflow.The workflow uses
ubuntu-24.04-arm, an ARM-based runner. For a simple workflow that only checks out code and creates a GitHub issue, this is functional but consider whether this runner type is necessary or ifubuntu-latestwould be more broadly available.
3-17: Workflow structure looks good.The trigger configuration (both manual dispatch and scheduled monthly) aligns well with the PR objectives. The cron schedule
0 0 1 * *will trigger on the 1st of every month at 00:00 UTC, and the action integration with the template file is correct. The use ofGITHUB_TOKENfor authentication is appropriate..github/THIS_MONTH_IN_FOREST_REMINDER_TEMPLATE.md (1)
1-26: Template structure and content are well-crafted.The issue template provides clear guidance with a logical flow: introductory context, pre-gathering considerations, and post-gathering actionable checklist items. The informational lines (12-16) effectively guide contributors on what to look for, followed by concrete checkbox items (20-26) that track completion. The label "Type: Task" is appropriate for a recurring team task reminder. The links to GitHub Discussions and Slack channels are helpful for directing contributors to publication targets.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary of changes
Changes introduced in this pull request:
This Month in Forest.Reference issue to close (if applicable)
Closes #6284
Other information and links
Change checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.