Skip to content

[automated] Update Lotus version in API tests #6263

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
LesnyRumcajs merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2025
Merged

[automated] Update Lotus version in API tests #6263

LesnyRumcajs merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2025
+22 −10

Conversation

@leshyatwork
Copy link
Contributor

@leshyatwork leshyatwork bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Changes

  • Updates Lotus version in the JSON-RPC API tests to the latest release.

@leshyatwork leshyatwork bot added the RPC requires calibnet RPC checks to run on CI label Nov 25, 2025
@leshyatwork leshyatwork bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2025 00:17
@leshyatwork leshyatwork bot requested review from hanabi1224 and removed request for a team November 25, 2025 00:17
@leshyatwork leshyatwork bot added the RPC requires calibnet RPC checks to run on CI label Nov 25, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@leshyatwork leshyatwork bot force-pushed the leshy/update-lotus-version branch 3 times, most recently from 9a86f89 to ef431e1 Compare December 1, 2025 08:27
@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

LesnyRumcajs commented Dec 1, 2025

Blocked until @akaladarshi resolves (at least temporarily) the RPC CI issue.

@hanabi1224
Copy link
Contributor

hanabi1224 commented Dec 1, 2025

I believe there is another issue with the image itself. It complains GLIBC not found

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

LesnyRumcajs commented Dec 1, 2025

I believe there is another issue with the image itself. It complains GLIBC not found

Good catch, I reported it to the Lotus team.

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

LesnyRumcajs commented Dec 1, 2025

To be revisited once filecoin-project/lotus#13441 is merged and a fixed image published.

@leshyatwork leshyatwork bot force-pushed the leshy/update-lotus-version branch 2 times, most recently from 981b8a8 to 2bccc82 Compare December 3, 2025 00:18
@leshyatwork leshyatwork bot force-pushed the leshy/update-lotus-version branch from 2bccc82 to 44d488b Compare December 3, 2025 15:03
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs force-pushed the leshy/update-lotus-version branch from 6f9e405 to 6854ff6 Compare December 4, 2025 09:50
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs marked this pull request as draft December 4, 2025 09:53
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs force-pushed the leshy/update-lotus-version branch from 6854ff6 to b950c64 Compare December 4, 2025 09:53
@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

LesnyRumcajs commented Dec 4, 2025

Need to do first #6213, I'll tackle it later today.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs force-pushed the leshy/update-lotus-version branch from b950c64 to 89c1303 Compare December 4, 2025 12:02
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs force-pushed the leshy/update-lotus-version branch from 89c1303 to b9936a2 Compare December 4, 2025 12:35
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 13:19
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2025
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2025
Closed
1 task
Merged via the queue into main with commit 07cbdaf Dec 4, 2025
70 of 71 checks passed
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs deleted the leshy/update-lotus-version branch December 4, 2025 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@hanabi1224 hanabi1224 hanabi1224 approved these changes

@akaladarshi akaladarshi akaladarshi approved these changes

Assignees

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs

@akaladarshi akaladarshi

Labels

RPC requires calibnet RPC checks to run on CI

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@LesnyRumcajs @hanabi1224 @akaladarshi