Skip to content

Conversation

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs commented Oct 29, 2025

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

  • the link was failing here and it probably doesn't make sense to mention this in our guide (finding how to debug any language is trivial since the conception of the first search engine)

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation
    • Streamlined the state migration guide by removing debugging instructions, making the documentation cleaner and more focused.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested a review from a team as a code owner October 29, 2025 16:47
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested review from hanabi1224 and sudo-shashank and removed request for a team October 29, 2025 16:47
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation update removes two lines containing VS Code debugging instructions and link description from the Go test section in the state migration guide. No test examples or surrounding content were affected.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
documentation/src/developer_documentation/state_migration_guide.md
Removed VS Code debugging instruction link and description lines from Go test section

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • hanabi1224
  • elmattic
  • sudo-shashank

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "fix: rm vscode broken link" directly and accurately describes the main change in the changeset. The title clearly indicates that a broken VSCode link is being removed from the documentation, which aligns with the actual changes made (removal of VS Code debugging instruction link lines from state_migration_guide.md). The title is specific, concise, and uses clear language that conveys the primary intent of the change without unnecessary noise or vagueness.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch rm-vscode-link

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 05bc6d7 and abcfb57.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • documentation/src/developer_documentation/state_migration_guide.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • documentation/src/developer_documentation/state_migration_guide.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Build forest binaries on Linux AMD64
  • GitHub Check: cargo-publish-dry-run
  • GitHub Check: Build MacOS
  • GitHub Check: Build Ubuntu

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 30, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 91f4ed1 Oct 30, 2025
50 checks passed
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs deleted the rm-vscode-link branch October 30, 2025 08:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants