Skip to content

Conversation

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs commented Oct 28, 2025

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed an automated test workflow to streamline CI/CD infrastructure.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested a review from a team as a code owner October 28, 2025 11:11
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested review from elmattic and hanabi1224 and removed request for a team October 28, 2025 11:11
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Walkthrough

Removal of .github/workflows/rpc_test_repeat.yml, a GitHub Actions workflow that executed RPC comparison tests on a 10x10 matrix schedule via manual dispatch or daily cron, including Docker image preparation and log collection steps.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow deletion
\.github/workflows/rpc_test_repeat\.yml
Removed entire workflow file including manual dispatch trigger, daily cron schedule, matrix-based job iteration (10x10), Docker image setup, RPC test execution, and Docker log collection logic.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "chore: remove unused rpc repeat workflow" directly and accurately describes the primary change in the pull request, which is the removal of the .github/workflows/rpc_test_repeat.yml workflow file. The title uses appropriate conventional commit prefixing ("chore:") for maintenance work, is concise and clear, and provides sufficient specificity that a teammate reviewing the git history would understand the main change without needing to examine the full diff. The title is neither vague nor misleading, and it fully corresponds to the changeset content.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch rpc-repeat-remove

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c9f7fe8 and f23e85d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/rpc_test_repeat.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/rpc_test_repeat.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: All lint checks
  • GitHub Check: Build forest binaries on Linux AMD64
  • GitHub Check: cargo-publish-dry-run
  • GitHub Check: Build Ubuntu
  • GitHub Check: Build MacOS
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: tests-release

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 28, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 461c0b3 Oct 28, 2025
40 checks passed
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs deleted the rpc-repeat-remove branch October 28, 2025 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants