Skip to content

Conversation

@pennylees
Copy link
Contributor

@pennylees pennylees commented Oct 27, 2025

Summary of changes

remove repetitive word

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Fixed minor documentation typos across CI/workflow files (clarified wording in several comments). These are non-functional editorial updates that improve clarity; no behavior, control flow, or automated workflow actions were changed.

@pennylees pennylees requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2025 09:09
@pennylees pennylees requested review from LesnyRumcajs and hanabi1224 and removed request for a team October 27, 2025 09:09
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Walkthrough

Three GitHub workflow files were edited to fix comment typos: two instances of "per per" changed to "per" and one "the the" changed to "the". No functional changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow comment fixes
\.github/workflows/curio-devnet-publish.yml, \.github/workflows/lotus-devnet-publish.yml, \.github/workflows/lotus-api-bump.yml
Corrected comment typos: replaced duplicate "per per" with "per" in two publish workflows and fixed "the the" → "the" in the lotus-api-bump workflow. No code or control-flow changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Review is straightforward: verify comments were corrected and no functional edits occurred.

Suggested reviewers

  • elmattic
  • LesnyRumcajs

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "chore: remove repetitive word" accurately summarizes the main objective of the changeset. The pull request removes duplicate words across three workflow files in .github/workflows/: specifically removing "per per" to "per" in two files and "the the" to "the" in another. The title is concise, specific, and clearly conveys the primary change without unnecessary noise. While the title uses singular "word" rather than plural "words," this is a minor stylistic choice that does not obscure the meaning—a teammate reviewing the history would readily understand that this PR addresses removing repetitive words from comments.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e56b28f and d647ca5.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/curio-devnet-publish.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lotus-api-bump.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lotus-devnet-publish.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/lotus-devnet-publish.yml
  • .github/workflows/lotus-api-bump.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/curio-devnet-publish.yml (1)

5-5: Good catch on the repetitive word typo.

The comment is now clearer with the duplicate "per" removed.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

@hanabi1224 hanabi1224 enabled auto-merge October 27, 2025 09:33
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 27, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

@pennylees could you please sign the CLA?

@pennylees
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pennylees could you please sign the CLA?

Of course. Signed. Please review.

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

@pennylees Your commits also need to be signed.

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

@pennylees Here's a guide how to do it https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/signing-commits. Note that you will need to amend your previous commits so that they're signed - it should be as easy as git rebase origin/main once you have everything set up.

Signed-off-by: pennylees <techdashen@msn.com>
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 28, 2025 15:47

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@pennylees
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pennylees Here's a guide how to do it https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/signing-commits. Note that you will need to amend your previous commits so that they're signed - it should be as easy as git rebase origin/main once you have everything set up.

Thanks for your help! Signed and rebased.

Please review again.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 28, 2025
Merged via the queue into ChainSafe:main with commit c1b56db Oct 28, 2025
48 of 86 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants