Skip to content

Conversation

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs commented Aug 4, 2025

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow configurations by removing the step that relocated Docker volumes to a different directory for disk space management. No changes to user-facing features or functionality.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2025 09:02
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested review from akaladarshi and sudo-shashank and removed request for a team August 4, 2025 09:02
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The workflow steps that previously relocated the Docker volumes folder to a different disk location and created a symbolic link were removed from two GitHub Actions workflow files. No other steps or logic were changed in these workflows.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Workflow Docker Volume Relocation Removal
.github/workflows/forest.yml, .github/workflows/rpc-parity.yml
Removed the step that moved Docker volumes to /mnt/docker-volumes, created a symlink, and listed disk usage.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels

RPC

Suggested reviewers

  • akaladarshi
  • hanabi1224

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33db8e8 and 86fd110.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/forest.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/rpc-parity.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/rpc-parity.yml
  • .github/workflows/forest.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: Build Ubuntu
  • GitHub Check: cargo-publish-dry-run
  • GitHub Check: Build MacOS
  • GitHub Check: Build forest binaries on Linux AMD64
  • GitHub Check: tests-release
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: All lint checks
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (rust)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch lean-rpc-parity-workflows

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@hanabi1224 hanabi1224 added the RPC requires calibnet RPC checks to run on CI label Aug 4, 2025
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit ca67546 Aug 4, 2025
64 of 65 checks passed
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs deleted the lean-rpc-parity-workflows branch August 4, 2025 11:08
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2026
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

RPC requires calibnet RPC checks to run on CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants