Skip to content

bump go version in docker #5866

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
elmattic merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

bump go version in docker #5866

elmattic merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2025

Conversation

@sudo-shashank
Copy link
Contributor

@sudo-shashank sudo-shashank commented Jul 28, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

  • Fix [automated] Docker check failure

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes #5864 #5865

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the build environment to use a newer version of Go for improved stability and support.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile was updated to change the build environment's base image from golang:1.23-bookworm to golang:1.24-bookworm. No other modifications were made to the Dockerfile or any other files.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Docker base image update
Dockerfile		 Updated the build stage base image from golang:1.23-bookworm to golang:1.24-bookworm.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Resolve Docker check failure by updating Dockerfile base image (#5864) ✅

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes found.

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch shashank/bump-go
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sudo-shashank sudo-shashank marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 06:00
@sudo-shashank sudo-shashank requested a review from a team as a code owner July 28, 2025 06:00
@sudo-shashank sudo-shashank requested review from LesnyRumcajs and elmattic and removed request for a team July 28, 2025 06:00
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e7b3fed and 18225f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: tests-release
  • GitHub Check: Build forest binaries on Linux AMD64

@elmattic elmattic added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 28, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 19c11c8 Jul 28, 2025
42 checks passed
@elmattic elmattic deleted the shashank/bump-go branch July 28, 2025 08:48
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2025
Merged
4 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2025
Merged
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@elmattic elmattic elmattic approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[automated] Docker check failure

4 participants

@sudo-shashank @LesnyRumcajs @elmattic