Skip to content

[action] [PR:19818] Split packet trimming case into symmetric and asymmetric#647

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202412from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202412/19818
Aug 12, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:19818] Split packet trimming case into symmetric and asymmetric#647
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202412from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202412/19818

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary: Splitting the packet trimming tests into symmetric and asymmetric
Fixes #
The packet trimming feature supports symmetric mode and asymmetric mode. Currently both mode cases in the same file. Need split them, this will greatly help us see where are we for all the features to be landed.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

Split case

How did you verify/test it?

Run regression locally, pass

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary: Splitting the packet trimming tests into symmetric and asymmetric
Fixes #
The packet trimming feature supports symmetric mode and asymmetric mode. Currently both mode cases in the same file. Need split them, this will greatly help us see where are we for all the features to be landed.

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
    - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [x] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [x] 202505

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?

#### How did you do it?
Split case

#### How did you verify/test it?
Run regression locally, pass

#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#19818

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit d2f70f1 into Azure:202412 Aug 12, 2025
5 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant