Skip to content

Revert el8 package build#11325

Merged
fengzhou-msft merged 3 commits intoAzure:devfrom
fengzhou-msft:rpm_feature
Nov 21, 2019
Merged

Revert el8 package build#11325
fengzhou-msft merged 3 commits intoAzure:devfrom
fengzhou-msft:rpm_feature

Conversation

@fengzhou-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fengzhou-msft fengzhou-msft commented Nov 20, 2019

We have merged #11235 to build el7 package with Python 3, I have tested it on RHEL 8/ Centos 8/Fedora 31, it works fine.

Building and releasing an extra el8 package has some overheads such as extra package management work, going through Linux repo onboarding process and users need to change the base url for the package repo. At this moment, an el8 package doesn't seem necessary as long as el7 package works.

@aghassemlouei
Copy link
Copy Markdown

It's worth noting that newer version of rpm-build will fix the issues with sha256 signing and use of package on FIPS enabled systems and actually resolve #20719.

@archoversight
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is there a possibility that this reversion could get reverted?

#20719 (comment)

says that FIPS is not on the roadmap, but using a newer version of rpm-build (which is shipped with CentOS 8 or RHEL 8) would alleviate the issues as the package would be appropriately signed and thus installable on systems that no longer support MD5 hashing.

@jiasli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jiasli commented Dec 29, 2021

@archoversight, regarding your comment

Is there a possibility that this reversion could get reverted?

CentOS 8 has been already deprecated:

https://www.centos.org/centos-linux-eol/

CentOS Linux 8 will reach End of Life on December 31, 2021.

I don't think it is a good idea to use CentOS 8 anymore.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants