-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
research: semantic ontology layer for cross-agent entity alignment #689
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
prio:highImportant, should be prioritizedImportant, should be prioritizedscope:large3+ days of work3+ days of workspec:architectureDESIGN_SPEC Section 15 - Technical ArchitectureDESIGN_SPEC Section 15 - Technical Architecturespec:communicationDESIGN_SPEC Section 5 - Communication ArchitectureDESIGN_SPEC Section 5 - Communication Architecturetype:researchEvaluate options, make tech decisionsEvaluate options, make tech decisionsv0.7Minor version v0.7Minor version v0.7v0.7.6Patch release v0.7.6Patch release v0.7.6
Description
Context
VentureBeat article identifies the core multi-agent problem: agents built on different platforms/contexts have divergent definitions of business entities (customer, order, region), causing "hallucination by fragmented context."
Why This Matters
SynthOrg's current design assumes agents share understanding through YAML company config. As delegation depth grows and agents accumulate different memory states and context windows, divergent entity interpretation becomes a systemic failure mode -- not just a model quality issue. Microsoft's Fabric IQ addresses this via shared semantic ontology via MCP.
Action Items
- Analyze whether current YAML company config is sufficient for deep delegation chains
- Design a lightweight semantic broadcast mechanism for the communication layer
- Evaluate: should core business entities (tasks, agents, budgets, roles) have canonical definitions accessible via message bus?
- Cross-reference with multi-agent memory consistency research (arXiv:2603.10062)
References
- VentureBeat: Enterprise Agents Different Realities
- Multi-Agent Memory from CompArch Perspective -- "memory consistency is the most pressing challenge"
- Microsoft Fabric IQ as reference implementation
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
prio:highImportant, should be prioritizedImportant, should be prioritizedscope:large3+ days of work3+ days of workspec:architectureDESIGN_SPEC Section 15 - Technical ArchitectureDESIGN_SPEC Section 15 - Technical Architecturespec:communicationDESIGN_SPEC Section 5 - Communication ArchitectureDESIGN_SPEC Section 5 - Communication Architecturetype:researchEvaluate options, make tech decisionsEvaluate options, make tech decisionsv0.7Minor version v0.7Minor version v0.7v0.7.6Patch release v0.7.6Patch release v0.7.6