Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Yes, I agree, this would be great thing if we could have something like information schema to get the ontology of metadata in database. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Little update, with #1026 we'd be able to describe the graph schema and then render it in Studio. I still think another cool feature would be a command that browses the database and build the dynamic schema with data present in the database, no matter if you defined a schema or not. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It could be nice to have a way to draw a graph based on types and edges so we can see the abstract graph like we do in a ERD.
This is a short example of relation in the database. There's 134 different class types.
but if I want a DER it should be something like this:
(I omit the name of relationships in the graph and should be added)
I think that if we can register some metadata in the edge, like (type) in (cardinality) - (cardinality) out (type) , the graph could be made.
and if a edge do not have that info it is ignored in the Graph-Relation-Explain graph
The relations should be visible even if no instance exist.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions