net: front and back addresses cannot be in the same subnet#521
Merged
AltraMayor merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Aug 11, 2021
Merged
net: front and back addresses cannot be in the same subnet#521AltraMayor merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
AltraMayor merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
The addresses of the front and back interfaces of Gatekeeper cannot be neighbors, that is, they must be in different subnets. This is necessary to guarantee that attackers cannot bypass Gatekeeper. The problem was first reported in issue #519.
Owner
Author
|
Tested on the XIA1 server. |
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The addresses of the front and back interfaces of Gatekeeper cannot be neighbors, that is, they must be in different subnets.
This is necessary to guarantee that attackers cannot bypass Gatekeeper.
The problem was first reported in issue #519.