Merged
Conversation
Combining ACL types reduces effort while classifying packets, and increases the number of packets passed to callback functions.
Owner
Author
|
Tested on our XIA1 server. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Combining ACL types reduces effort while classifying packets, and increases the number of packets passed to callback functions.
While the impact of this pull request varies with what the NICs support, it's expected to affect IPv6 more than IPv4 ACL rules. For example, consider the ACLs for IPv4 and IPv6 for front and back interfaces on our XIA1 server before this pull request:
The output above was obtained with a breakpoint at
finalize_stage2(), so the ACLs were complete. Below is the same output after this pull request: