Skip to content

Conversation

@t-bast
Copy link
Member

@t-bast t-bast commented Oct 15, 2025

Instead of storing every transaction spending the commit tx (which potentially included remote anchor transactions, which we aren't interested in), we explicitly store only the transactions that spend outputs of the commit tx we're interested in. This is more verbose than the previous code, but avoids unintended side-effects such as storing remote transactions.

Instead of storing every transaction spending the commit tx (which
potentially included remote anchor transactions, which we aren't
interested in), we explicitly store only the transactions that spend
outputs of the commit tx we're interested in. This is more verbose
than the previous code, but avoids unintended side-effects such as
storing remote transactions.
@t-bast t-bast marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2025 12:56
@t-bast t-bast requested a review from pm47 October 15, 2025 13:08
@t-bast t-bast merged commit 0baddd9 into master Oct 15, 2025
1 check passed
@t-bast t-bast deleted the refactor-update-irrevocably-spent branch October 15, 2025 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants