Conversation
Branch names with slashes will become able to be used.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #137 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 93 93
Branches 6 6
=========================================
Hits 93 93 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve the addition of a new constant Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/server.test.ts (1)
62-72: LGTM! Good test coverage for redirects with slashed refs.The test properly verifies redirect behavior with slashed refs. However, consider maintaining consistent naming style:
- await t.step("/:ref (withSlash, Redirect)", async () => { + await t.step("/:ref (with Slash, Redirect)", async () => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/libs/test_utils.ts(1 hunks)src/server.test.ts(2 hunks)src/server.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/libs/test_utils.ts (1)
43-51: LGTM! Well-documented test constant.
The new constant follows the established pattern and includes proper JSDoc documentation with examples.
src/server.ts (2)
30-30: LGTM! Route pattern correctly handles slashed refs.
The new pattern /:ref{.+}? appropriately allows slashes in the ref parameter while maintaining its optional nature.
Line range hint 30-56: Verify the removal of catch-all route handler.
The catch-all route handler that previously redirected unmatched routes has been removed. This changes how 404s are handled.
src/server.test.ts (1)
55-60: LGTM! Good test coverage for direct access with slashed refs.
The test appropriately verifies that refs containing slashes work for direct access.
close #
✏️ Description
Branch names with slashes will become able to be used.
🔄 Type of the Change
Code of Conduct.