Remove minimum gas enforcement while creating Accesslist#1773
Merged
Remove minimum gas enforcement while creating Accesslist#1773
Conversation
Contributor
|
Look good! Is it possible to add a unit test to verify the fix? |
Contributor
Author
|
tests done @cffls |
|
kamuikatsurgi
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Because our minimum gas enforcement like the one at PIP-35, the accesslist creation was including this gas when calculating it. By doing that, addresses with no fund were not able to calculate access list via
eth_createAccessListreceiving responses likeinsufficient funds for gas * price + value.This PR handles this by enforcing 0 gas while calculating the accesslist.
Changes