proc_open() accepts list<string> for $command in 7.4+#590
Merged
ondrejmirtes merged 2 commits intophpstan:masterfrom Jul 25, 2021
pmmp:proc-open-php74
Merged
proc_open() accepts list<string> for $command in 7.4+#590ondrejmirtes merged 2 commits intophpstan:masterfrom pmmp:proc-open-php74
ondrejmirtes merged 2 commits intophpstan:masterfrom
pmmp:proc-open-php74
Conversation
Member
|
Please write some NodeScopeResolverTest asserts to confirm what works and what doesn't. |
Contributor
Author
|
I'm not sure how to write such test for NodeScopeResolver. I don't think assertType test suit for this. |
Member
|
Oh, it's about accepting, not returning. So you need to test it in CallToFunctionParametersRuleTest. |
Member
|
Thank you! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not sure if this needs to be added somewhere for 8.0 as well? The stubs will have it correct, but won't be as detailed about the type.