Resolves #289: Handle processParent in mojos which support it.#813
Conversation
|
@slawekjaranowski please review |
1d5b043 to
87a6d2f
Compare
|
I have updated it a bit to fold Another point to consider: I think #134 is not limited to that one mojo, but may be present everywhere -- to be checked and possibly fixed. |
82eda30 to
e5fdcf1
Compare
|
Sorry about these multiple updates today, I think that's it for this PR. Now it all looks lean and clean. Almost all mojos updating versions consist of an almost similar method (which by the way could also be folded), and a (small) business method, providing the provider function, instructing Another area to improve is the |
e5fdcf1 to
e421730
Compare
|
@slawekjaranowski rebased. Please review. |
Also: - added failIfNotReplaced to ForceReleasesMojo as a first steps towards converging with UseReleasesMojo - enhanced documentation on UseReleasesMojo#allowRangeMatching - streamlined UseReleasesMojo in order to converge it with ForceReleasesMojo and then fold further with other similar mojos - added unit tests and integration tests - some refactoring
e421730 to
8ce921e
Compare
|
Correct |
Also:
More steps towards folding ForceReleases and UseReleases will follow. Also, I see it's possible to reuse parts of the common base class used for lastest versions/releases, but this will follow in future PRs.