• ❌ The commit (9f7618f) is missing the User's ID, preventing the EasyCLA check. Consult GitHub Help to resolve.For further assistance with EasyCLA, please submit a support request ticket.

The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ tomerv (f6c85d1)

How can I make progress with this?
@gnossen @lidizheng

Wow, this is an interesting proposal. A programmatic way to access descriptors from client-side. This PR alters gRPC Python's surface API, which requires a gRFC proposal see https://github.com/grpc/proposal. It doesn't need to be long or very detail about implementation. You can extend from the "Use Server Reflection in a Python client" section.

I opened a PR for a proposal, and I will handle all the comments in this PR soon.

According to the presubmit checks, you may want to add the new test case to https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/python/grpcio_tests/tests/tests.json.

According to the presubmit checks, you may want to add the new test case to https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/python/grpcio_tests/tests/tests.json.

Done. Sorry for the delay.
I couldn't get the test to run correctly on my machine, so I hope my change is correct.

@tomerv Can you take a look at the Sanity Checks result? https://source.cloud.google.com/results/invocations/66d0ab27-16cc-4972-b54c-bc55e5d2cc4f/targets

Most of the scripts can be run directly to format code for you.

• ✅ tomerv (f6c85d1, 925e6f4, e95464e, 4d11e64)

• ❌ The commit (190f15f) is missing the User's ID, preventing the EasyCLA check. Consult GitHub Help to resolve.For further assistance with EasyCLA, please submit a support request ticket.

Seems like the checks are stuck. @lidizheng, can you help?