Chore: refactor parser-loading out of linter.verify#10028
Merged
not-an-aardvark merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Feb 27, 2018
Merged
Chore: refactor parser-loading out of linter.verify#10028not-an-aardvark merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
not-an-aardvark merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
platinumazure
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2018
gyandeeps
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2018
This was referenced Mar 2, 2018
This was referenced Mar 16, 2018
This was referenced Mar 22, 2018
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[x] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
This is a refactoring that moves the logic for loading parsers out of
linter._verifyWithoutProcessorsand into theparsefunction, for the purpose of simplifyinglinter._verifyWithoutProcessors.Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Nothing in particular