Rebased and cleaned up version of UTF-16/32 BE/LE PR#206
Merged
dan-blanchard merged 5 commits intomasterfrom Jun 24, 2022
Merged
Rebased and cleaned up version of UTF-16/32 BE/LE PR#206dan-blanchard merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
dan-blanchard merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
d717c42 to
b1f7335
Compare
jayvdb
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2020
|
Any new? |
|
It would be really cool if this could be merged. Is there anything still left to do? |
Member
Author
|
It's possibly unrelated, but I've had |
- Restored file suffix filter in test.py - Added functionality to identify valid unicode, to enhance detection - Generated some non-trivial unicode examples using supplementary plane 1
b1f7335 to
c30a33f
Compare
This was referenced Jun 24, 2022
Merged
hswong3i
pushed a commit
to alvistack/chardet-chardet
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2025
* support for UTF-16 and UTF-32 detection missing BOMs * Changes per PR comments - Restored file suffix filter in test.py - Added functionality to identify valid unicode, to enhance detection - Generated some non-trivial unicode examples using supplementary plane 1 * clean up poorly written comments * Run black on PR * Fix some minor linting issues Co-authored-by: Jason Zavaglia <jason.zavaglia@gmail.com>
hswong3i
pushed a commit
to alvistack/chardet-chardet
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2025
* support for UTF-16 and UTF-32 detection missing BOMs * Changes per PR comments - Restored file suffix filter in test.py - Added functionality to identify valid unicode, to enhance detection - Generated some non-trivial unicode examples using supplementary plane 1 * clean up poorly written comments * Run black on PR * Fix some minor linting issues Co-authored-by: Jason Zavaglia <jason.zavaglia@gmail.com>
hswong3i
pushed a commit
to alvistack/chardet-chardet
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2025
* support for UTF-16 and UTF-32 detection missing BOMs * Changes per PR comments - Restored file suffix filter in test.py - Added functionality to identify valid unicode, to enhance detection - Generated some non-trivial unicode examples using supplementary plane 1 * clean up poorly written comments * Run black on PR * Fix some minor linting issues Co-authored-by: Jason Zavaglia <jason.zavaglia@gmail.com>
hswong3i
pushed a commit
to alvistack/chardet-chardet
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2026
* support for UTF-16 and UTF-32 detection missing BOMs * Changes per PR comments - Restored file suffix filter in test.py - Added functionality to identify valid unicode, to enhance detection - Generated some non-trivial unicode examples using supplementary plane 1 * clean up poorly written comments * Run black on PR * Fix some minor linting issues Co-authored-by: Jason Zavaglia <jason.zavaglia@gmail.com>
hswong3i
pushed a commit
to alvistack/chardet-chardet
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2026
* support for UTF-16 and UTF-32 detection missing BOMs * Changes per PR comments - Restored file suffix filter in test.py - Added functionality to identify valid unicode, to enhance detection - Generated some non-trivial unicode examples using supplementary plane 1 * clean up poorly written comments * Run black on PR * Fix some minor linting issues Co-authored-by: Jason Zavaglia <jason.zavaglia@gmail.com>
hswong3i
pushed a commit
to alvistack/chardet-chardet
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2026
* support for UTF-16 and UTF-32 detection missing BOMs * Changes per PR comments - Restored file suffix filter in test.py - Added functionality to identify valid unicode, to enhance detection - Generated some non-trivial unicode examples using supplementary plane 1 * clean up poorly written comments * Run black on PR * Fix some minor linting issues Co-authored-by: Jason Zavaglia <jason.zavaglia@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is just #109 with some rebasing/formatting changes.