CONTENTS
- Diagnosis of LBBB
- Interpretation of ECG in the context of LBBB
diagnosis of LBBB
⚠️ About a third of people who meet the conventional diagnosis of LBBB may actually have LVH +/- LAHB. (21376930) If the QRS interval is close to 120 ms, it may be difficult to differentiate between the two.
LBBB criteria (#1-2 help differentiate from LVH)
- [1] QRS >120 ms (more convincing if >130♀ or >140♂).
- Greater QRS duration is more specific for LBBB as opposed to LVH (QRS >130 ms in women or >140 ms in men). (21376930)
- [2] V5, V6, I, aVL: Broad and notched/slurred R waves.
- [3] V1 is predominantly negative (QS or rS) with a positive T-wave. (de Luna 2022)
- [4] No septal Q-waves in left-sided precordial leads (unless prior Q-wave MI).
- [5] No evidence of LBBB mimics:

[#1/4] axis is unaffected by LBBB
left axis deviation
- LBBB with LAD is often seen in dilated cardiomyopathy.
- LAHB isn't the explanation (all LBBB have LAHB).
- General discussion of LAD: 📖
right axis deviation (uncommon)
- Causes include:
- Extreme verticalization of the heart.
- Acute right ventricular overload (e.g., PE).
- Right ventricular hypertrophy.
- LPFB isn't the explanation (all LBBB have LPFB).
- General discussion of RAD: 📖
[#2/4] chambers
atria are unaffected.
RVH is suggested if:
- RAA.
- Right axis deviation, with an RS in lead I that, isn't explained by other etiologies. 📖
- V1 has an r-wave that is conspicuous (in the absence of prior myocardial infarction). (de Luna 2022)
LVH:
- ~80% of patients with LBBB have increased left ventricular mass. (O'Keefe 2021)
- ECG features suggestive of LVH: (39348743, 38204852)
- LAA (sensitivity ~40%, specificity ~88%).
- R-aVL >11 mm (sensitivity ~10%, specificity ~95%).
- Sokolow-Lyon (sensitivity ~20%, specificity ~90%).
[#3/4] signs of prior infarction in LBBB
Q-waves
- Q-wave >30 ms in III suggests for prior IMI.
- Pathological Q's in lateral leads.
- (QS is expected in V1-V4.)
other signs of prior infarct/scar
- Cabrera's sign: V3, V4, or V5 shows notching of the ascending limb of the S-wave.
- Chapman's sign: V6, Lead I, or aVL shows notching of the upstroke of the R-wave.

[#4/4] signs of acute ischemia in LBBB
- [1] ST deviation (Smith-Modified Sgarbossa criteria): Any of the following indicates ischemia (even if only in a single lead):
- Any lead with 1 mm of concordant STE.
- Any single lead with excessively discordant STE (STE >25% of the preceding S-wave).
- Any of the leads V1-V3 with 1 mm of concordant STD.
- Potential confounders that may generate false-positive results are tachycardia, respiratory failure, hyperkalemia, and diastolic Bp > 120 mm.
- [2] Convexity
- Marked convexity may support ischemia, especially in the precordial leads (example below).
- [3] Concordant T-waves
- Normally, T-waves should be discordant.
- TWI in leads with negative QRS (i.e., right precordial leads) is relatively specific (albeit insensitive) for ischemia.
- [4] Changes from baseline
- Especially qualitative changes.

clinical significance of LBBB
- Causes of LBBB include:
- LVH.
- Myocardial infarction.
- Congenital heart disease.
- Degenerative conduction system disease.
- (Very rarely seen as a normal finding.)
- Patients with LBBB and systolic heart failure (EF <35%) may benefit from cardiac resynchronization pacemakers (CRT), especially if the QRS is >130-140 ms.
To keep this page small and fast, questions & discussion about this post can be found on another page here.
References
- 38536171 Treger JS, Allaw AB, Razminia P, Roy D, Gampa A, Rao S, Beaser AD, Yeshwant S, Aziz Z, Ozcan C, Upadhyay GA. A Revised Definition of Left Bundle Branch Block Using Time to Notch in Lead I. JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Mar 27:e240265. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0265 [PubMed]


