Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0446
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0446
On the role of artificial intelligence in feature oriented multi-criteria decision analysis
Heyuan Liu, Yi Zhao, François Maréchal
June 27, 2025
Abstract
Balancing economic and environmental goals in industrial applications is critical amid challenges like climate change. Multi-objective optimization (MOO) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) are key tools for addressing conflicting objectives. MOO generates viable solutions, while MCDA selects the optimal option based on key performance indicators such as profitability, environmental impact, safety, and efficiency. However, large datasets pose a challenge in selecting the preferred solution during the MCDA process This study introduces a novel machine learning-enhanced MCDA framework and applies the method to analyze decarbonization solutions for a European refinery. A stage-wise dimensionality reduction method, combining AutoEncoders and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), is applied to simplify high-dimensional datasets while preserving key spatial features. Geometric analysis techniques, including Intrinsic Shape Signatures (ISS), are employed to refine the identification of typical configurations for baseline evaluations. Once typical configurations are identified, Large Language Models (LLMs) are utilized to enhance decision-making by providing contextual problem explanations and generating weight proposals for the weighted sum method, ensuring alignment with decision criteria. This framework is designed to support stakeholders in making informed, transparent decisions in complex, uncertain environments.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Key performance indicator, Machine Learning, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Suggested Citation
Liu H, Zhao Y, Maréchal F. On the role of artificial intelligence in feature oriented multi-criteria decision analysis. Systems and Control Transactions 4:1830-1836 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.175488
Author Affiliations
Liu H: Industrial Process and Energy Systems Engineering (IPESE), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Sion, Switzerland; MSc&T AiViC, École Polytechnique, Palasieau, France
Zhao Y: Industrial Process and Energy Systems Engineering (IPESE), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Sion, Switzerland
Maréchal F: Industrial Process and Energy Systems Engineering (IPESE), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Sion, Switzerland
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
1830
Last Page
1836
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 1830-1836-1544-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0446
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.175488
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
899
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0446
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Zhao, Y., Hagi, H., Delahaye, B., & Maréchal, F. (2024). A holistic approach to refinery decarbonization based on atomic, energy and exergy flow analysis. Energy, 296, 131117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131117
  2. Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., & Zhao, J. H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(9), 2263-2278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
  3. Nolzen, N., Lademann, A., Roskosch, D., Moret, S., Seele, H., Baader, F. J., & Bardow, A. (2024). Low-regret decisions for the steam supply in the chemical industry. In ESCAPE-34 PSE-2024
  4. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological bulletin, 81(2), 95 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037613
  5. Wang, Y., Yao, H., & Zhao, S. (2016). Auto-encoder based dimensionality reduction. Neurocomputing, 184, 232-242 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.104
  6. Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical transactions of the royal society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
  7. Davies, D. L., & Bouldin, D. W. (1979). A cluster separation measure. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, (2), 224-227 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909
  8. Calinski, T., & Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 3(1), 1-27 https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927408827101
  9. Zhong, Y. (2009, September). Intrinsic shape signatures: A shape descriptor for 3D object recognition. In 2009 IEEE 12th international conference on computer vision workshops, ICCV Workshops (pp. 689-696). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2009.5457637
  10. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 1877-1901
  11. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., ... & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 24824-24837

[0.25 s]