Proceedings of ESCAPE 35ISSN: 2818-4734
Volume: 4 (2025)
Table of Contents
LAPSE:2025.0240
Published Article
LAPSE:2025.0240
Assessing the economic viability of green methanol production: The critical role of CO2 purity in green methanol production
Franc González-Cazorla, Jordi Pujol, Oriol Martínez, Lluis Soler, Moisès Graells
June 27, 2025
Abstract
The growing concern over climate change and rising carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions have spurred the development of strategies to upcycle greenhouse gases. One promising solution is the synthesis of green methanol via catalytic hydrogenation of captured CO2 using renewable hydrogen (H2). This provides a versatile chemical feedstock for fuels and industrial processes while reducing CO2 levels. Recent advancements in CO2 capture technologies achieve purities ranging from 83% to 98% (v/v), enabling a sustainable integration with green hydrogen for methanol production. While research has largely focused on CO2 purities above 96%, such models overlook the variability and lower purities typical of industrial carbon capture streams. Addressing this gap, this study examines the economic impacts of CO2 purity on methanol synthesis. Using Aspen Hysys V14, the hydrogenation process is simulated to assess the effects of varying CO2 purities on operational costs, yield, and profitability, providing a realistic evaluation under actual industrial conditions. The results reveal that even slight changes in CO2 purity markedly influence both costs and profitability, highlighting the importance of studying CO2 capture technologies for methanol production. This study quantifies the relationship between CO2 purity and operational cost, contributing critical insights for process operation. By emphasizing the role of CO2 purity in enhancing both sustainability and economic feasibility, it advances the understanding of green methanol production as a viable strategy for climate change mitigation.
Keywords
CO2 hydrogenation, Green methanol production, Technoeconomic Analysis
Suggested Citation
González-Cazorla F, Pujol J, Martínez O, Soler L, Graells M. Assessing the economic viability of green methanol production: The critical role of CO2 purity in green methanol production. Systems and Control Transactions 4:553-558 (2025) https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.149306
Author Affiliations
González-Cazorla F: GasN2, Carrer Roure Gros, 23, Sentmenat, Barcelona, 08181, Spain; Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est (EEBE), Av. Eduard Maristany, 16, 08019, Barcelona, Spain
Pujol J: GasN2, Carrer Roure Gros, 23, Sentmenat, Barcelona, 08181, Spain
Martínez O: GasN2, Carrer Roure Gros, 23, Sentmenat, Barcelona, 08181, Spain
Soler L: Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est (EEBE), Av. Eduard Maristany, 16, 08019, Barcelona, Spain
Graells M: Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est (EEBE), Av. Eduard Maristany, 16, 08019, Barcelona, Spain
Journal Name
Systems and Control Transactions
Volume
4
First Page
553
Last Page
558
Year
2025
Publication Date
2025-07-01
Version Comments
Original Submission
Other Meta
PII: 0553-0558-1477-SCT-4-2025, Publication Type: Journal Article
Record Map
Published Article

LAPSE:2025.0240
This Record
External Link

https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.149306
Article DOI
Download
Files
Jun 27, 2025
Main Article
License
CC BY-SA 4.0
Meta
Record Statistics
Record Views
952
Version History
[v1] (Original Submission)
Jun 27, 2025
 
Verified by curator on
Jun 27, 2025
This Version Number
v1
Citations
Most Recent
This Version
URL Here
https://psecommunity.org/LAPSE:2025.0240
 
Record Owner
PSE Press
Links to Related Works
Directly Related to This Work
Article DOI
References Cited
  1. Liu Z, Deng Z, Davis SJ, Giron C, Ciais P. Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2021. Nat Rev Earth Environ 3:217-219 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00285-w
  2. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2022. IEA (2022)
  3. Koytsoumpa EI, Bergins C, Kakaras E. The CO2 economy: review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies. J Supercrit Fluids 132:3-16 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029
  4. Olah GA, Goeppert A, Prakash GS. Chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and dimethyl ether: from greenhouse gas to renewable, environmentally carbon neutral fuels and synthetic hydrocarbons. J Org Chem 74:487-498 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1021/jo801260f
  5. Bhadola A, Patel V, Potdar S, Mallick S. Technology scouting - carbon capture: from today's to novel technologies. Report no. 18/20. Concawe, Brussels (2020)
  6. Gutiérrez Ortega AE, Nomen i Ribé R, González Olmos R. Carbon dioxide capture and utilization by VPSA: a sustainable development. Universitat Ramon Llull (2019)
  7. Nestler F, Krüger M, Full J, Hadrich MJ, White RJ, Schaadt A. Methanol synthesis - industrial challenges within a changing raw material landscape. Chem Ing Tech 90:1409-1418 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800026
  8. Marlin DS, Sarron E, Sigurbjörnsson Ó. Process advantages of direct CO2 to methanol synthesis. Front Chem 6:446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00446
  9. Farahiyah Abdul Rahman, Md Maniruzzaman A. Aziz, R. Saidur, Wan Azelee Wan Abu Bakar, M.R Hainin, Ramadhansyah Putrajaya, Norhidayah Abdul Hassan. Pollution to solution: Capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:112-126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.011
  10. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Sixth ed. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2002)
  11. Demirci UB, Miele P. Overview of the relative greenness of the main hydrogen production processes. J Clean Prod 52:1-10 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.025
  12. Joo O-S, Jung K-D, Moon I, Rozovskii AY, Lin GI, Han S-H, Uhm S-J. Carbon dioxide hydrogenation to form methanol via a reverse-water-gas-shift reaction (the CAMERE process). Ind Eng Chem Res 38:1808-1812 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9806848
  13. Mignard D, Sahibzada M, Duthie JM, Whittington HW. Methanol synthesis from flue-gas CO2 and renewable electricity: a feasibility study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 28:455-464 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00082-4
  14. Pontzen F, Liebner W, Gronemann V, Rothaemel M, Ahlers B. CO2-based methanol and DME - Efficient technologies for industrial scale production. Catal Today 171:242-250 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.04.049
  15. Soltanieh M, Mahmoodi Azar K, Saber M. Development of a zero emission integrated system for co-production of electricity and methanol through renewable hydrogen and CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 7:145-152 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.008
  16. Van-Dal ÉS, Bouallou C. Design and simulation of a methanol production plant from CO2 hydrogenation. J Clean Prod 57:38-45 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.008
  17. Genovese M, Blekhman D, Dray M, Fragiacomo P. Multi-year energy performance data for an electrolysis-based hydrogen refueling station. Int J Hydrogen Energy 52:688-704 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.084
  18. Plaza MG, García S, Rubiera F, Pis JJ, Pevida C. Post-combustion CO2 capture with a commercial activated carbon: comparison of different regeneration strategies. Chem Eng J (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.030
  19. Choi WK, Kwon TI, Yeo YK, Lee H, Song H, Na BK. Optimal operation of the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process for CO2 recovery. Korean J Chem Eng 20:617-623 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706663
  20. Ishibashi M, Ota H, Akutsu N, Umeda S, Tajika M, Izumi J, Yasutake A, Kabata T, Kageyama Y. Technology for removing carbon dioxide from power plant flue gas by the physical adsorption method. Energy Convers Manag 37:929-933 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(95)00279-0
  21. Chatake VS, Rambhia HV, Bhalerao SS, Korpale VS, Ahire JP, Pandit AB. Process simulation and optimization of methanol production and utilization for electricity generation. Waste Manag Bull 2:56-63 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2024.09.005
  22. Martin-Valmayor MA, Gil-Alana LA, Infante J. Energy prices in Europe: evidence of persistence across markets. Resour Policy 82:103546 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103546

[0.27 s]