Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
  3. Article

How high is visual short-term memory capacity for object layout?

  • Research Articles
  • Published: May 2010
  • Volume 72, pages 1097–1109, (2010)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
How high is visual short-term memory capacity for object layout?
Download PDF
  • Thomas Sanocki1,
  • Eric Sellers1,
  • Jeff Mittelstadt1 &
  • …
  • Noah Sulman1 
  • 864 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Previous research measuring visual short-term memory (VSTM) suggests that the capacity for representing the layout of objects is fairly high. In four experiments, we further explored the capacity of VSTM for layout of objects, using the change detection method. In Experiment 1, participants retained most of the elements in displays of 4 to 8 elements. In Experiments 2 and 3, with up to 20 elements, participants retained many of them, reaching a capacity of 13.4 stimulus elements. In Experiment 4, participants retained much of a complex naturalistic scene. In most cases, increasing display size caused only modest reductions in performance, consistent with the idea of configural, variable-resolution grouping. The results indicate that participants can retain a substantial amount of scene layout information (objects and locations) in short-term memory. We propose that this is a case of remote visual understanding, where observers’ ability to integrate information from a scene is paramount.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

When remembering less is more: Unfiltered items are associated with reduced memory fidelity in visual short-term memory

Article 29 April 2024

Visual working memory for connected 3D objects: effects of stimulus complexity, dimensionality and connectivity

Article Open access 19 February 2022

Not all objects are created equal: The object benefit in visual working memory is supported by greater recollection-like memory, but only for memorable objects

Article 28 October 2024

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Long-term Memory
  • Episodic Memory
  • Object vision
  • Visual system
  • Visual Perception
  • Working Memory

References

  • Aginsky, V., & Tarr, M. J. (2000). How are different properties of a scene encoded in visual memory? Visual Cognition, 7, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual shortterm memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, G. [A.], & Oliva, A. (2007). The role of global layout in visual short-term memory. Visual Cognition, 15, 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmole, J. R., Wang, R. F., & Irwin, D. E. (2002). Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eng, H. Y., Chen, D., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1127–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T. (1987). A developmental look at pattern symmetry in perception and memory. Developmental Psychology, 23, 839–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franconeri, S. L., Alvarez, G. A., & Enns, J. T. (2007). How many locations can be selected at once? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1003–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., Gonzalez, C. L. R., & Króliczak, G. (2008). Action rules: Why the visual control of reaching and grasping is not always influenced by perceptual illusions. Perception, 37, 355–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, pp. 89–110). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. J., Wu, B., Ooi, T. L., Yarbrough, G., & Wu, J. (2004). Judging egocentric distance on the ground: Occlusion and surface integration. Perception, 33, 789–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, A. (2004). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 519–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, A. (2005). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 396–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, A. (2006). Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, A. (2007). Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, A., Hyun, J.-S., & Zhang, W. (2005). The role of visual short-term memory in empty cell localization. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1332–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intraub, H. (1997). The representation of visual scenes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 217–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 420–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 882–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 683–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaga, M. I., & Garner, W. R. (1983). Effect of line orientation on various information-processing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Visual working memory for briefly presented scenes. Journal of Vision, 5, 650–658.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J. (2008). Visual short-term memory. In S. J. Luck & A. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 43–85). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Melcher, D. (2001). Persistence of visual memory for scenes. Nature, 412, 401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melcher, D. (2006). Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 6, 8–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, R., Braunstein, M. L., & Andersen, G. J. (2005). Distance perception from motion parallax and ground contact. Visual Cognition, 12, 1235–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, I. R., & Marshuetz, C. (2005). Remembering “what” brings along “where” in visual working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. E. (1975). Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman, D. E. Rumelhart, & LNR Research Group (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 279–307). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. A. (2000a). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. A. (2000b). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing. Visual Cognition, 7, 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanocki, T. (1999). Constructing structural descriptions. Visual Cognition, 6, 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanocki, T. (2003). Representation and perception of scenic layout. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 43–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanocki, T., Michelet, K., Sellers, E., & Reynolds, J. (2006). Representations of scene layout can consist of independent, functional pieces. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanocki, T., & Sulman, N. (2009). Priming of simple and complex scene layout: Rapid function from the intermediate level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 735–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebrechts, M. M., & Garner, W. R. (1981). Stimulus-specific processing consequences of pattern goodness. Memory & Cognition, 9, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torralba, A. (2003). Contextual priming for object detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 53, 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsal, Y., Meiran, N., & Lamy, D. (1995). Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. Visual Cognition, 2, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecera, S. P., & Palmer, S. E. (2006). Grounding the figure: Surface attachment influences figure-ground organization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 563–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, J. R., Gauchou, H. L., Tallon-Baudry, C., & O’Regan, J. K. (2005). Relational information in visual short-term memory: The structural gist. Journal of Vision, 5, 244–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. E., Coppola, D. M., & Fitzpatrick, D. (2001). The contribution of sensory experience to the maturation of orientation selectivity in ferret visual cortex. Nature, 411, 1049–1052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 693–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 899–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, PCD 4118, University of South Florida, 33620-8200, Tampa, FL

    Thomas Sanocki, Eric Sellers, Jeff Mittelstadt & Noah Sulman

Authors
  1. Thomas Sanocki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric Sellers
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeff Mittelstadt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Noah Sulman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Sanocki.

Additional information

Portions of the present results were presented at the First Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, May 2001, and the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 2001.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanocki, T., Sellers, E., Mittelstadt, J. et al. How high is visual short-term memory capacity for object layout?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1097–1109 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.1097

Download citation

  • Received: 04 June 2008

  • Accepted: 18 January 2010

  • Issue date: May 2010

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.1097

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Display Size
  • Complex Scene
  • Capacity Estimate
  • Stimulus Element
  • Texture Gradient

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

162.0.217.198

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature