Abstract
In recent years, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have shown remarkable potential in modeling conservative systems of rigid-body dynamics. However, when applied to practical interaction tasks of manipulators (e.g., part assembly and medical operations), existing PINN frameworks lack effective external force modeling mechanisms, resulting in significantly degraded prediction accuracy in dynamic interaction scenarios. Additionally, because industrial robots (including UR5 and UR10e robots) are generally not equipped with joint torque sensors, obtaining precise dynamics training data remains challenging. To address these issues, this study proposes two enhanced PINNs that integrate motor dynamics and external force modeling. First, two data-driven Jacobian matrix estimation methods are introduced to incorporate external forces: one learns the mapping between end-effector velocity and joint velocity to approximate the Jacobian matrix, while the other first learns the system’s kinematic behavior and then derives the Jacobian matrix through analytical differentiation of the forward kinematics model. Second, current-to-torque mapping is embedded as physical prior knowledge to establish direct correlations between system motion states and motor currents. Experimental results on two different manipulators demonstrate that both models achieve high-precision torque estimation in complex external force scenarios without requiring joint torque sensors. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, the proposed models improve overall modeling accuracy by 31.12% and 37.07% on average across various complex scenarios, while reducing joint trajectory tracking errors by 40.31% and 51.79%, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Akbari M, Mehr JK, Ma L, et al., 2023. Uncertainty-aware safe adaptable motion planning of lower-limb exoskeletons using random forest regression. Mechatronics, 95:103060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2023.103060
Caccavale F, Siciliano B, Villani L, 2003. The Tricept robot: dynamics and impedance control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 8(2):263–268. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2003.812839
Chen ZX, Renda F, Le Gall A, et al., 2025. Data-driven methods applied to soft robot modeling and control: a review. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng, 22:2241–2256. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2024.3377291
Cheng S, Hu BB, Wei HL, et al., 2025. Deep learning-based hybrid dynamic modeling and improved handling stability assessment for autonomous vehicles at driving limits. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 74(4):5582–5593. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3515209
Chrosniak JY, Ning J, Behl M, 2024. Deep dynamics: vehicle dynamics modeling with a physics-constrained neural network for autonomous racing. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 9(6):5292–5297. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2024.3388847
Clochiatti E, Scalera L, Boscariol P, et al., 2024. Electromechanical modeling and identification of the UR5 e-series robot. Robotica, 42(7):2430–2452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574724000833
CraneIII CD, Duffy J, 1998. Kinematic Analysis of Robot Manipulators. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
Djeumou F, Neary C, Goubault E, et al., 2022. Neural networks with physics-informed architectures and constraints for dynamical systems modeling. Proc 4th Learning for Dynamics and Control Conf.
Duong T, Altawaitan A, Stanley J, et al., 2024. Port-Hamiltonian neural ODE networks on Lie groups for robot dynamics learning and control. IEEE Trans Robot, 40:3695–3715. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2024.3428433
Gu WB, Primatesta S, Rizzo A, 2024. Physics-informed neural network for quadrotor dynamical modeling. Rob Auton Syst, 171:104569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2023.104569
Gupta JK, Menda K, Manchester Z, et al., 2020. Structured mechanical models for robot learning and control. Proc 2nd Annual Conf on Learning for Dynamics and Control, p.328–337.
Hu HB, Shen ZK, Zhuang CG, 2025. A PINN-based friction-inclusive dynamics modeling method for industrial robots. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 72(5):5136–5144. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2024.3476977
Khatib O, 1987. A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: the operational space formulation. IEEE J Robot Automat, 3(1):43–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRA.1987.1087068
Laddach K, Langowski R, Rutkowski TA, et al., 2022. An automatic selection of optimal recurrent neural network architecture for processes dynamics modelling purposes. Appl Soft Comput, 116:108375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108375
Lahoud M, Marchello G, D’Imperio M, et al., 2024. A deep learning framework for non-symmetrical Coulomb friction identification of robotic manipulators. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Robotics and Automation, p.10510–10516. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610737
Li ZL, Bai JS, Ouyang HJ, et al., 2024. Physics-informed neural networks for friction-involved nonsmooth dynamics problems. Nonl Dyn, 112(9):7159–7183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-09350-z
Li ZM, Wu SS, Chen WB, et al., 2024. Extrapolation of physics-inspired deep networks in learning robot inverse dynamics. Mathematics, 12(16):2527. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162527
Li ZM, Wu SS, Chen WB, et al., 2025. Physics-informed neural networks for compliant robotic manipulators dynamic modeling. J Comput Sci, 90:102633. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOCS.2025.102633
Liu JY, Borja P, Della Santina C, 2024. Physics-informed neural networks to model and control robots: a theoretical and experimental investigation. Adv Intell Syst, 6(5):2300385. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202300385
Lutter M, Peters J, 2023. Combining physics and deep learning to learn continuous-time dynamics models. Int J Rob Res, 42(3):83–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/02783649231169492
Lutter M, Ritter C, Peters J, 2019. Deep Lagrangian networks: using physics as model prior for deep learning. Proc 7th Int Conf on Learning Representations.
Phong LD, Choi J, Lee W, et al., 2015. A novel method for estimating external force: simulation study with a 4-DOF robot manipulator. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 16(4):755–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0100-7
Pikuliński M, Malczyk P, Aarts R, 2025. Data-driven inverse dynamics modeling using neural-networks and regression-based techniques. Multibody Syst Dyn, 63(3):341–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-024-10024-2
Roehrl MA, Runkler TA, Brandtstetter V, et al., 2020. Modeling system dynamics with physics-informed neural networks based on Lagrangian mechanics. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2):9195–9200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2182
Shah SV, Saha SK, Dutt JK, 2012. Modular framework for dynamic modeling and analyses of legged robots. Mech Mach Theory, 49:234–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.10.006
Sousa CD, Cortesão R, 2014. Physical feasibility of robot base inertial parameter identification: a linear matrix inequality approach. Int J Robot Res, 33(6):931–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913514870
Tao Y, Chen S, Liu HT, et al., 2025. Robot hybrid inverse dynamics model compensation method based on the BLL residual prediction algorithm. Robotica, 43(1):350–367. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574724001905
Trinh M, Geist AR, Monnet J, et al., 2025. Newtonian and Lagrangian neural networks: a comparison towards efficient inverse dynamics identification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17994
Wu SS, Li ZM, Chen WB, et al., 2024. Dynamic modeling of robotic manipulator via an augmented deep Lagrangian network. Tsinghua Sci Technol, 29(5):1604–1614. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2024.9010011
Xu PF, Han CB, Cheng HX, et al., 2022. A physics-informed neural network for the prediction of unmanned surface vehicle dynamics. J Marine Sci Eng, 10(2):148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Fengyu SUN and Shuangshuang WU designed the research, conducted the experiments, and analyzed the results. Zhiming LI and Peilin XIONG assisted with data processing. Fengyu SUN drafted the paper. Shuangshuang WU and Wenbai CHEN reviewed and revised the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Project supported by the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation-Xiaomi Innovation Joint Fund (No. L233006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 62276028 and 92267110), the Qin Xin Talents Cultivation Program at Beijing Information Science and Technology University (No. QXTCP A202102), and the Beijing Information Science and Technology University School Research Fund (No. 2023XJJ12)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, F., Wu, S., Li, Z. et al. Physics-informed neural networks for the prediction of robot dynamics considering motor and external force couplings. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng 26, 2604–2622 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2500254
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2500254