01 September 2012: Public Health
Short and long term mortality rates associated with first pregnancy outcome: Population register based study for Denmark 1980–2004
David C. Reardon ABDEFG , Priscilla K. Coleman ACDE
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.883338
Med Sci Monit 2012; 18(9): PH71-76
Background
Previous record based studies in Finland have shown that death rates within 1 year of a pregnancy event are significantly higher for women who had a pregnancy loss compared to women who were not pregnant and to women who carried to full term [1–4]. The results of a U.S. study revealed that elevated rates of death following a pregnancy loss persisted for 4 years or more; but the researchers also found that the effects may be mitigated by successful delivery of subsequent pregnancies [5].
All existing studies of mortality rates associated with prior pregnancy outcomes have been limited to pregnancies within an arbitrary range of women’s reproductive lives and have lacked information on the subjects’ complete reproductive history. Therefore, one of the main purposes of this study is to eliminate the potential confounding effect of unknown prior pregnancy history by examining mortality rates associated specifically with first pregnancy outcome alone.
An additional purpose of this study is to distinguish between mortality rates associated with early induced abortions versus later abortions, a subject that has not been previously addressed in any population register based studies. While there is well established consensus that late-term abortions are associated with more physiological risks and higher rates of maternal mortality in the short term compared to early abortions [6], very little is known regarding mortality rates beyond one year.
Material and Methods
The present investigation is a register based study using existing data from Statistic Denmark: the National Hospital Register (1977–2004) for information on miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies and other losses; the Fertility database (FTDB) for births and stillbirths; the National Board of Health Abortion Registry (1973–2004) for abortions; the Cause of Death Register; and the day of death from the CPR register (1980–2004). Data from all registers was linked using unique identification numbers assigned to all residents of Denmark. The study was approved by the National Board of Health and the Data Protection Agency.
The population includes all women in Denmark born over a 30 year period, from 1962 through 1991, who were alive as of January 1, 1980 and did not die prior to age 16. The oldest women in this study population were 11 years-old in 1973 (when the abortion registry began), and 15 years-old in 1977 (when information on miscarriages treated in hospitals became available).
Pregnancy histories were constructed from the fertility register, abortion register, and hospital discharge registers. First pregnancy outcomes were segregated by live birth, miscarriage, early abortion, and late abortion. Only singleton births were included in the birth group, to eliminate the confounding effects of cases of multiple births and situations including both a live birth and pregnancy loss. Miscarriage data is only available for cases which included a record of hospital treatment. Other losses, including ectopic pregnancy, still birth, and other products of conception were excluded from this analysis due to comparatively low numbers. Induced abortions were classified as late abortions if they occurred after the first twelve weeks of gestation.
Unadjusted death rates per 100,000 cases were calculated for (1) each of the first 10 years following the date of the pregnancy outcome, and (2) for cumulative periods from 180 days, 1 to 5 years, 10 years, and for the full length of the data window. Chi-square tests for significance were conducted for each time period using women who gave birth as the control group.
To control for the effects of time associated with changing medical technology and population health over the three decades examined, adjusted odds ratios were then calculated to control for the year of each woman’s birth and the woman’s age at the time of her first pregnancy outcome. These logistic regression analyses were conducted to yield odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the cumulative mortality rates associated with each of the three pregnancy loss groups compared to the single live birth group for periods of 180 days, 1 to 5 years, up to 10 years, and over the full length of the data window.
Results
A total of 463,473 women who had at least one pregnancy between 1980 and 2004 were included in the study, 2,238 of whom had died. The average year of birth for those who died (n=2,238) was 1966.45 (SD=4.33). First pregnancies in the population occurred at an average age of 24.69 years (SD=4.63). The average age at death was 27.4 (SD=7.3), with a range of 16 to 43 years of age.
Table 1 shows unadjusted death rates per 100,000 cases occurring within each year of the first ten years following each first pregnancy outcome. Death rates associated with birth were lower than those associated with all three types of pregnancy loss in every year. Chi-squared tests were run to compare death rates for miscarriage and early abortion to death rates for birth in each year. The difference between birth and early abortion groups was significant in 6 of the 10 years; whereas the difference between birth and miscarriage was significant in 2 of the 10 years. Significance tests were not conducted for late abortion since there were fewer than 5 deaths per year for that group, rendering any tests for significance unreliable.
Table 2 shows the unadjusted cumulative death rates during periods of time from 180 days up to the full study period segregated by first pregnancy outcome. The table also shows the average age at first pregnancy and at death stratified for each pregnancy outcome. Compared to mortality rates of women who gave birth, the mortality rates associated with early abortion were significantly higher for every time period examined. The cumulative mortality rate associated with late abortion was significantly higher than for birth for every time period greater than one year. The cumulative mortality rate associated with miscarriage was not significantly different from the birth group except for the longest periods of time examined, for 10 years and for the full study period.
Results from the logistic regression analyses, controlling for age at first pregnancy and the year of the woman’s birth, are shown in Figures 1–3. These figures show the observed odds ratios for cumulative deaths occurring up to each identified period along with upper and lower 95% confidence intervals for each time period analyzed.
Figure 1 shows the adjusted odds ratios associated with first pregnancies ending in early abortion compared to those ending in a live birth after adjusting for age at first pregnancy and year of the woman’s birth. The risk of death associated with an early abortion was significantly higher during nearly all time periods examined.
Figure 2 shows the adjusted odds ratios associated with late abortions compared to birth. The results should be interpreted cautiously, however, due to the low frequencies (only 4 deaths occurred in the first year, and only 22 deaths in the 10 year window). But even with low numbers, the results were statistically significant for all time periods examined (lower 95% CI >1.0).
Figure 3 shows the adjusted odds ratios for deaths among women who had a miscarriage treated in a hospital compared to women who successfully gave birth. The observed odds ratio was greater than 1 in all periods examined, but the results were only statistically significant (lower 95% CI >1.0) for cumulative periods beyond 4 years.
Discussion
LIMITATIONS:
Our analysis did not consider the possible impact of subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Prior research has shown that different pregnancy outcomes for multiple pregnancies are associated with different mortality rates. For example, during an 8 year period examined among low income women in California, the mortality rate for women who had a delivery following abortion was 462 per 100,000, significantly lower than for women who had only abortions during the same time frame, 854 per 100,000 [5]. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes may therefore be an important mediating factor in mortality rates
Another limitation is that our analysis does not control for socioeconomic factors, marital status, psychological history, or other factors prior to first pregnancy which may affect the subsequent risk of death.
Still another limitation of our study is that all causes of death were analyzed together. Previous studies have shown that elevated risks of death associated with perinatal loss were most pronounced relative to external causes of death (suicide, homicide, accidents) [2,4,5]. But higher rates of deaths from natural causes [3,5], including significantly higher mortality rates from circulatory and cerebrovascular disease [5], have also been observed. Additional research is necessary to determine how first pregnancy outcome may be associated with specific causes of death.
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
There are at least three theories which may explain the differences in mortality rates observed. The first theory may be called the ”healthy pregnant woman effect” [3,9]. This theory suggests that healthier women are more likely to be able to concieve and carry a pregnancy to term. Conversely, women who are unhealthy may be unable to concieve or may be more likely to have a spontaneous or therapuetic abortion.
The second theory is that pregnancy, especially one carried to term, produces health benefits which reduce the risk of death. For example, carrying a pregancy to term is associated with physiological changes associated with a reduced risk of breast [10], ovarian [11], and endrometrial cancers [12]. Live births may also contribute to psychological benefits, or at least behavioral changes and lifestyle choices associated with being a parent which improve health and/or reduce unhealthy or risk-taking behaviors.
The third theory is that pregnancy loss may contribute to physiological or psychological effects which increase risk of death. For example, abortion is associated with an increased risk of suicide [4], substance abuse [13], post-traumatic stress disorder [14], and a lower assessment of general health [15]. In addition, it is notable that the elevated rates of mortality associated with pregnancy loss observed in this study are on the same order of magnitude as the elevated rates of mortality among women who experience the death of a child under 18 years of age [16]. Factors common to both experiences may explain the effect observed in both groups.
All three theories, and other factors not yet identified, may contribute to the effects revealed by our analyses. Further research is necessary to tease out both any positive health effects of childbirth and any negative health effects of pregnancy loss.
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING FUTURE RESEARCH:
As discussed in the limitations section above, a very large number of additional factors should be explored to better understand the effects observed. Subsequent pregnancies, prior physical and mental health, relationship status, and socioeconomic factors are all likely to have effects on mortality rates. Many of these factors likely have interdependencies and serial correlations which seriously complicate regression analyses. In particular, both the occurrence and outcome of subsequent pregnancies may be correlated with earlier pregnancy outcomes. For example, pregnant teenagers are 4 to 6 times more likely to abort if they have already had a prior abortion than teens without a prior history of abortion [17]. To most carefully explore interactions relative to multiple pregnancies, we recommend that future research examine results stratified by all combinations of earlier pregnancy outcomes. For example, mortality rates for each second pregnancy outcome should be stratified relative to whether the first pregnancy ended in birth, miscarriage or abortion.
A good deal of insight might also be gained by case-control studies which are carefully designed [18]. In addition to selecting control groups relative to year of the woman’s birth, age at first pregnancy, marital status, and socioeconomic status, cases should be matched to controls with similar psychiatric histories prior to the year of the first pregnancy.
An important objective of future research should be to identify which subgroups of women experiencing a pregnancy loss may benefit the most from additional health care or counseling services. For example, it is hypothetically possible that most of the observed effects occur among low income women with a history of depression. But until additional research narrows the subgroups of the population most at risk, this and previous studies [2,4,5] clearly demonstrate that both voluntary and involuntary pregnancy loss are at least markers for increased risk of death, both in the short term and the longer term. We therefore repeat our previous recommendation that clinicians should routinely inquire about a history of pregnancy loss as a step toward inviting discussion of any unresolved issues relative to a prior abortion or miscarriage which patients might hesitate to reveal without a specific invitation to discuss it [19]. This information may help to alert general practitioners, gynecologists, mental health workers, and others, to offer information, treatments, and referrals which may avoid or mitigate any increased risks for negative outcomes associated with pregnancy loss.
Conclusions
Compared to women who delivered, women who had an early or late abortion had significantly higher mortality rates within 1 through 10 years. A lesser effect may also be present relative to miscarriage. Recommendations for additional research are offered.
References
1. Gissler M, Kauppila R, Merilainen J, Pregnancy – associated deaths in Finland 1987–1994 – definition problems and benefits of record linkage: Acta Obset Gynecol Scand, 1997; 76; 651-57
2. Gissler M, Berg C, Bouvier-Colle MH, Buekens P, Injury deaths, suicides and homicides associated with pregnancy, Finland 1987–2000: Eur J Public Health, 2005; 15(5); 459-63, pmid: 16051655
3. Gissler M, Berg C, Bouvier-Colle MH, Buekens P, Pregnancy-associated mortality after birth, spontaneous abortion or induced abortion in Finland, 1987–2000: Am J Ob Gyn, 2004; 190; 422-27
4. Gissler M, Hemminki E, Lonnqvist J, Suicides after pregnancy in Finland: 1987–94: register linkage study: BMJ, 1996; 313; 1431-34, pmid: 8973229
5. Reardon DC, Ney PG, Scheuren FJ, Deaths associated with pregnancy outcome: a record linkage study of low income women: South Med J, 2002; 95(8); 834-41, pmid: 12190217
6. Bartlett LA, Risk Factors for Legal Induced Abortion-Related Mortality in the United States: Obstet Gynecol, 2004; 103(4); 729-37, pmid: 15051566
7. Gissler M, Berg C, Bouvier-Colle MH, Buekens P, Methods for identifying pregnancy-associated deaths: population-based data from Finland 1987–2000: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2004; 18(6); 448-55, pmid: 15535821
8. Atrash HK, Lawson HW, Ellerbrock TV, Pregnancy-related mortality From data to action CDC’s public health surveillance for women, infants, and children, 1994; 141-54
9. Ronsmans C, Khlat M, Kodio B, Evidence for a “healthy pregnant woman effect” in Naikhar, Senegal?: Int J Epidemiol, 2001; 20; 467-73, pmid: 11416066
10. Ursin G, Bernstein L, Lord SJ, Reproductive factors and subtypes of breast cancer defined by hormone receptor and histology: Br J Cancer, 2005; 93; 364-71, pmid: 16079783
11. Risch HA, Marrett LD, Howe GR, Parity, contraception, infertility, and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: Am J Epidemiol, 1994; 140(7); 585-97, pmid: 7942759
12. Brinton LA, Reproductive, menstrual, and medical risk factors for endometrial cancer: Results from a case-control study: Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1992; 167; 1317-25, pmid: 1442985
13. Coleman PK, Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995–2009: British J Psychiatry, 2011; 199; 180-86
14. Rue VM, Coleman PK, Rue JJ, Reardon DC, Induced abortion and traumatic stress: a preliminary comparison of American and Russian women: Med Sci Monit, 2004; 10(10); SR5-16, pmid: 15448616
15. Ney PG, Fung T, Wickett AR, Beaman-Dodd C, The effects of pregnancy loss on women’s health: Soc Sci Med, 1994; 48(9); 1193-200, pmid: 8016684
16. Li J, Precht DH, Mortensen PB, Olsen J, Mortality in parents after death of a child in Denmark: a nationwide follow-up study: Lancet, 2003; 361; 363-67, pmid: 12573371
17. Joyce T, The social and economic correlates of pregnancy resolution among adolescents in New York city, by race and ethnicity: a multivariate analysis: Am j Public Health, 1988; 78(6); 626, pmid: 3285704
18. Bloom MS, Schisterman EF, Hediger ML, The use and misuse of matching in case-control studies: the example of polycystic ovary syndrome: Fertil Steril, 2007; 88(3); 707-10, pmid: 17433314
19. Reardon DC, Cougle JR, Rue VM, Psychiatric admissions of low income women following abortion and childbirth: Can Med Assoc J, 2003; 168(10); 1253-57, pmid: 12743066
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






