Skip to main content
Log in

A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper specifies a global mobility management architecture and protocol procedure called GPMIP, which is based on Proxy Mobile IPv6. In GPMIP, mobility management is performed by the network entity rather than individual mobile nodes. The benefit is the elimination of the wireless link data delivery tunnel overhead between a mobile node and the access router. To compare with the well known Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 mobility management protocol, the location update, packet delivery, and total cost functions generated by a mobile node during its average domain residence time are formulated for each protocol based on fluid flow mobility model. Then, the impacts of various system parameters on the cost functions are analyzed. The analytical results indicate that the proposed global mobility management protocol can guarantee lower total costs. Furthermore, a qualitative comparison between GPMIP and some other global management protocols is also investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 7
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 8
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 9
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 10
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 11
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 12
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 13
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 14
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J (2004) “Mobility support in IPv6”, RFC 3775

  2. Soliman H, Castelluccia C, El Malki K, Bellier L (2005) “Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management (HMIPv6)”, RFC 4140

  3. Kempf J, Ed (2007) "Problem Statement for Network-Based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM)", RFC 4830

  4. Kempf J, Ed (2007) "Goals for Network-Based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM)", RFC 4831

  5. Gundavelli S, Leung K, Devarapalli V, Chowdhury K, Patil B (2008) “Proxy mobile IPv6”, RFC 5213

  6. Njedjou E, Riera J (2006) "Problem statement for global IP mobility management", draft-njedjou-netlmm-globalmm-ps-01

  7. Yabusaki M, Okagawa T, Imai K (2005) “Mobility management in all-IP mobile network: end-to-end intelligence or network intelligence?”. IEEE Commun Mag 43(12):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. WiMAX end-to-end network systems architecture, (Stage 2: Architecture tenets, reference model and reference points), http://www.wimaxforum.org/technology/documents.

  9. 3GPP (2008) “3GPP system architecture evolution (SAE): report on technical options and conclusions”, 3GPP TR 23.882 2.0.0

  10. Ahlgren B, Eggert L, Ohlman B, Rajahalme J, Schieder A (2005) “Names, addresses and identities in ambient networks”, In first international ACM Workshop on Dynamic Interconnection of Networks (DIN'05). Cologne, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ahlgren B, Arkko J, Eggert L, Rajahalme J (2006) “A node identity internetworking architecture,” In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Global Internet Symposium, Barcelona, Spain

  12. ITU-T Draft New Recommendation Q.MMF (2007) “Generic framework of mobility management for next-generation networks (version 1.5)”

  13. Meyer D, Zhang L, Fall K (2007) "Report from the IAB workshop on routing and addressing", RFC 4984

  14. Internet Research Task Force Routing Research Group (RRG), http://tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/RoutingResearchGroup

  15. Reinbold P, Bonaventure O (2003) “IP Micro-Mobility Protocols”. IEEE Commun Surveys & Tutorials 5(1):40–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kong K, Han Y, Shin M, Yoo H, Lee W (2008) "Mobility management for All-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. Proxy mobile IPv6". IEEE Wireless Communications, pp. 36-45

  17. Roberts P, Kempf J (2006) “Mobility architecture for the global internet,” Proc. MobiArch ’06, pp. 23–28

  18. Na J-H, Park S, Moon J-M, Lee S, Lee E, Kim S-H (2008) "Roaming mechanism between PMIPv6 Domains", draft-park-netlmm-pmipv6-roaming-01

  19. Giaretta G, Ed (2008) "Interactions between PMIPv6 and MIPv6: scenarios and related issues", draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-01

  20. Patel A, Leung K, Khalil M, Akhtar H, Chowdhury K (2005) “Mobile node identifier option for mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)”, RFC 4283,

  21. Droms R, Bound J, Volz B, Lemon T, Perkins C, Carney M (2003) “Dynamic host configuration protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)”, RFC 3315

  22. Sarikaya B, Xia F (2007) “DHCPv6 based home network prefix delegation for PMIPv6”, draft-sarikaya-netlmm-prefix-delegation-01

  23. Troan O, Droms R (2003) "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6", RFC 3633

  24. Lior A, Chowdhury K, Tschofenig H (2007) “RADIUS mobile IPv6 support”, draft-ietf-mip6-radius-03

  25. Vixie P, Thomson S, Rekhter Y, Bound J (1997) “Dynamic updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)”, RFC 2136

  26. Chowdhury K, Yegin A (2007) “MIP6-bootstrapping for the integrated Scenario”, draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-integrated-dhc-04

  27. Giaretta G, Kempf J, Devarapalli V (2007) "Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping in Split Scenario", RFC 5026

  28. Kong K-S, Song MB, Park KJ, Hwang C-S (2006) "A comparative analysis on the signaling load of mobile IPv6 and hierarchical mobile IPv6: analytical approach". IEICE Trans Information and Systems E89-D(1):139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang X, Castellanos G, Campbell AT (2002) “P-MIP: Paging extensions for mobile IP”. ACM/Kluwer Mobile Networks and Applications 7(2):127–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pack S, Choi Y (2004) "A study on performance of hierarchical mobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks". IEICE Trans Commun E87-B(3):462–469

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60870015, 60833002) and 973 Program of China (No. 2007CB307101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han-Chieh Chao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, H., Zhang, H., Qin, Y. et al. A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol. Mobile Netw Appl 15, 530–542 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0185-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0185-2

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Hwang-Cheng Wang