Abstract
This paper specifies a global mobility management architecture and protocol procedure called GPMIP, which is based on Proxy Mobile IPv6. In GPMIP, mobility management is performed by the network entity rather than individual mobile nodes. The benefit is the elimination of the wireless link data delivery tunnel overhead between a mobile node and the access router. To compare with the well known Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 mobility management protocol, the location update, packet delivery, and total cost functions generated by a mobile node during its average domain residence time are formulated for each protocol based on fluid flow mobility model. Then, the impacts of various system parameters on the cost functions are analyzed. The analytical results indicate that the proposed global mobility management protocol can guarantee lower total costs. Furthermore, a qualitative comparison between GPMIP and some other global management protocols is also investigated.














Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J (2004) “Mobility support in IPv6”, RFC 3775
Soliman H, Castelluccia C, El Malki K, Bellier L (2005) “Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management (HMIPv6)”, RFC 4140
Kempf J, Ed (2007) "Problem Statement for Network-Based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM)", RFC 4830
Kempf J, Ed (2007) "Goals for Network-Based Localized Mobility Management (NETLMM)", RFC 4831
Gundavelli S, Leung K, Devarapalli V, Chowdhury K, Patil B (2008) “Proxy mobile IPv6”, RFC 5213
Njedjou E, Riera J (2006) "Problem statement for global IP mobility management", draft-njedjou-netlmm-globalmm-ps-01
Yabusaki M, Okagawa T, Imai K (2005) “Mobility management in all-IP mobile network: end-to-end intelligence or network intelligence?”. IEEE Commun Mag 43(12):16–24
WiMAX end-to-end network systems architecture, (Stage 2: Architecture tenets, reference model and reference points), http://www.wimaxforum.org/technology/documents.
3GPP (2008) “3GPP system architecture evolution (SAE): report on technical options and conclusions”, 3GPP TR 23.882 2.0.0
Ahlgren B, Eggert L, Ohlman B, Rajahalme J, Schieder A (2005) “Names, addresses and identities in ambient networks”, In first international ACM Workshop on Dynamic Interconnection of Networks (DIN'05). Cologne, Germany
Ahlgren B, Arkko J, Eggert L, Rajahalme J (2006) “A node identity internetworking architecture,” In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Global Internet Symposium, Barcelona, Spain
ITU-T Draft New Recommendation Q.MMF (2007) “Generic framework of mobility management for next-generation networks (version 1.5)”
Meyer D, Zhang L, Fall K (2007) "Report from the IAB workshop on routing and addressing", RFC 4984
Internet Research Task Force Routing Research Group (RRG), http://tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/RoutingResearchGroup
Reinbold P, Bonaventure O (2003) “IP Micro-Mobility Protocols”. IEEE Commun Surveys & Tutorials 5(1):40–56
Kong K, Han Y, Shin M, Yoo H, Lee W (2008) "Mobility management for All-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. Proxy mobile IPv6". IEEE Wireless Communications, pp. 36-45
Roberts P, Kempf J (2006) “Mobility architecture for the global internet,” Proc. MobiArch ’06, pp. 23–28
Na J-H, Park S, Moon J-M, Lee S, Lee E, Kim S-H (2008) "Roaming mechanism between PMIPv6 Domains", draft-park-netlmm-pmipv6-roaming-01
Giaretta G, Ed (2008) "Interactions between PMIPv6 and MIPv6: scenarios and related issues", draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-01
Patel A, Leung K, Khalil M, Akhtar H, Chowdhury K (2005) “Mobile node identifier option for mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)”, RFC 4283,
Droms R, Bound J, Volz B, Lemon T, Perkins C, Carney M (2003) “Dynamic host configuration protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)”, RFC 3315
Sarikaya B, Xia F (2007) “DHCPv6 based home network prefix delegation for PMIPv6”, draft-sarikaya-netlmm-prefix-delegation-01
Troan O, Droms R (2003) "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6", RFC 3633
Lior A, Chowdhury K, Tschofenig H (2007) “RADIUS mobile IPv6 support”, draft-ietf-mip6-radius-03
Vixie P, Thomson S, Rekhter Y, Bound J (1997) “Dynamic updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)”, RFC 2136
Chowdhury K, Yegin A (2007) “MIP6-bootstrapping for the integrated Scenario”, draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-integrated-dhc-04
Giaretta G, Kempf J, Devarapalli V (2007) "Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping in Split Scenario", RFC 5026
Kong K-S, Song MB, Park KJ, Hwang C-S (2006) "A comparative analysis on the signaling load of mobile IPv6 and hierarchical mobile IPv6: analytical approach". IEICE Trans Information and Systems E89-D(1):139–149
Zhang X, Castellanos G, Campbell AT (2002) “P-MIP: Paging extensions for mobile IP”. ACM/Kluwer Mobile Networks and Applications 7(2):127–141
Pack S, Choi Y (2004) "A study on performance of hierarchical mobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks". IEICE Trans Commun E87-B(3):462–469
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60870015, 60833002) and 973 Program of China (No. 2007CB307101).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, H., Zhang, H., Qin, Y. et al. A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol. Mobile Netw Appl 15, 530–542 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0185-2
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0185-2

