Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The usefulness of demographic and attitudinal variables in profiling time donors and nondonors is examined. Time volunteers emerge as similar in profile to money and anatomical-parts donors. From this, implications are derived for increasing time donation by volunteer organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beik, Leland L. and Scott M. Smith (1979), “Geographic Segmentation: A Fund Raising Example”, in (ed.) E. Laird LandonEducators' Conference Proceedings (Chicago: American Marketing Association), pp. 485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, John J. (1981), “Psychographic and Demographic Characteristics of Blood Donors”.Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (June), pp. 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, Theodore (1982),Middletown Families (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S.C., T. Deutscher and J.M. McCann (1977), “Segmenting Charitable Givers: An Application of Tobit”, in (eds.) Barnett Greenberg and Danny BellengerContemporary Marketing Thought (Chicago: American Marketing Association), pp. 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demott, B. (1978), “The Day the Volunteer Didn't”,Psychology Today, 3, pp. 23–24 and 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. (1976), “The Marketing of Non-profit Making Organizations: A Preliminary Report”,European Journal of Marketing, 5, pp. 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haire, Joseph F., Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald E. Tatum, and Bernie J. Grablowsky (1979),Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, (Tulsa: Petroleum Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henion, Karl E. and Richard R. Batsell (1976), “Marketing of Blood Donorship, Helping Behavior, and Psychological Reactance”, in (ed.) Kenneth L. Bernhardt1776–1976 and Beyond (Chicago: American Marketing Association), pp. 652–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Jan and Glen Riecken (1980), “Using Business Marketing Concepts to View the Private, Non-profit, Social Service Agency”,Administration in Social Work, 4 (Fall), pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. and M.S. Matell (1971), “Three Point Likert Scales Are Good Enough”,Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (November), pp. 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landon, E. Laird and Sharon K. Banks (1977), “Relative Efficiency and Bias of Plus-One Telephone Sampling”, Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August), pp. 294–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. R. (1980), “Kidney Donorship and Transplantation: A Social Marketing Problem”, in (eds.) Michael J. Baker and Michael A. SarenMarketing into the Eighties (Edinburgh: European Academy for Advanced Research in Marketing), pp. 104–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • “If Charities Don't Get Their Act Together, Government Will,” (1977),Los Angeles Times (December 25), p. 3.

  • Lovelock, Christopher H. and Charles B. Weinberg (1978), “Public and Nonprofit Marketing Comes of Age,” in (eds.) Gerald Zaltman and Thomas BonomaReview of Marketing 1978 (Chicago: American Marketing Association), pp. 416–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzer, Lee L. and Stephen J. Miller (1978), “An Examination of Value Attitude Structure in the Study of Donor Behavior,” in (eds.) Ronald J. Ebert, Robert J. Monroe and Kenneth J. Roering10th Annual Conference: American Institute for Decision Sciences (St. Louis: American Institute for Decision Sciences), pp. 204–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, John R. and S. Tamer Cavusgil (1981), “Audience Segments for the Performing Arts,” in James H. Donnelly and William George (eds.)Marketing of Services (Chicago: American Marketing Association), pp. 126–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. (1967),Psychometric Methods, (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, William D. and Hiram C. Barksdale (1979), “Consumer Attitudes Toward Government Intervention and Marketing Practices: A Factor Analytic Approach,” in (eds.) Joseph F. Hair, Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham and Bernie J. Grablowsky,Multivariate Data Anlysis (Tulsa: Petroleum Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riecken, Glen and Ugur Yavas (1979), “Meeting the Solicitation Challenge Through Marketing,”Administration in Social Work, 3 (Fall), pp. 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, John E. and Stephanie S. Robbins (1981), “Museum Marketing: Identification of High, Moderate, and Low Attendee Segments,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 9 (Winter/Spring), pp. 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • “A Vision of Volunteerism,” (1981),Time (October 19), p. 39.

  • “Catching On: ‘Do Good’ Vacations,” (1979),US News and World Report (March 26), p. 56.

  • Vaughn, Ronald J., Joseph Pitlik and Behram Hansotia (1978), “Understanding University Choice: A Multi-Attribute Approach,” in (ed.) Keith H. HuntAdvances in Consumer Research: Volume V. (Chicago: Association of Consumer Research), pp. 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavas, Ugur (1982), “Marketing an Art Event: The Case of Indiana Renaissance Fair,” in (ed.) Vinay KothariDevelopments in Marketing Science, Vol. 5 (Las Vegas: Academy of Marketing Science), pp. 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavas, Ugur and Glen Riecken (1980), “Application of Marketing Expertise to Volunteer-Time Dependent Nonprofit Organizations: A Neglected Area,” in (eds.) John H. Sumney and Ronald D. TaylorEvolving Marketing Thought for 1980 (Carbondale: Southern Marketing Association), pp. 325–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavas, Ugur, Glen Riecken and Ravi Parameswaran (1981), “Personality, Organization-Specific Attitude, and Socioeconomic Correlates of Charity Giving Behavior,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 9 (Winter/Spring), pp. 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yavas, U., Riecken, G. Can volunteers be targeted?. JAMS 13, 218–228 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729716

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729716

Keywords