Skip to main content
Log in

Experts' systems instead of expert systems

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By studying several cases of expert systems' use, a variety of difficulties were identified as directly depending on specific characteristics of experts and their tasks. This concerns more than the questions: “May experts be replaced by machines?” or “Is experts' knowledge explicable?”. The organisational structure of their work as well as the cyclic, non-plannable way of their task performing have further relevance. The paper introduces the concept of experts' systems to deal with diversities of their expertise and complexities of their work. It draws a distinction between non-monotonic problem solving, exploration, medium and modification, and argues that these modes are not reducible to yet another improved input/output strategy or dialogue style but introduce additional functions supporting the human-computer interaction according to experts' needs. In the first few sections, the paper covers the theoretical and empirical results of our research, whereas Section 4 introduces our design suggestions for experts' systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batson, G. (1972).Steps to an Ecology of Mind. <dt.>. Chandler Publisher.

  • Becker, B., Cremers, A. B., Herrmann, T., and Hoenen, M. (1994).Veränderungen der Wissensproduktion und-verteilung durch Expertensysteme. Arbeitspapiere der GMD 818. St. Augustin.

  • Böhle, F. and Milkau, B. (1988). Computerized Manufacturing and Empirical Knowledge. inAl & Society, 2, 235–243.

  • Busch, B., Herrmann, T., Just, K., and Rittenbruch, M. (1994).Systeme fur Experten statt Expertensysteme Von der Folgenforschung zur kompetenzförderlichen Gestaltung wissenbasierter Technik. infix Verlag, Sankt Augustin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A. (1983).The Psychologie of Human-Computer Interaction. Earlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (1982). The Adventure of Getting to Know a Computer, inIEEE Computer, 11(82), 49–58.

  • Carroll, J.M. and Kay, D.S. (1986).Prompting, Feedback and Error Correction in the Design of a Scenario Machine. RC 12047. IBM Research Division, Almadenet al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext. An Introduction and Survey, inIEEE Computer, 20(9), 17–41.

  • Coy, W. and Bonsiepen, L. (1989). Expert systems. Before the Flood? inInformation Processing '89 Proc 11th IFIP-World Congress, San Francisco. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremers, A. B., Bernemann, S., Hellingrath, B., and Joemann, J. (1988). Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Sprachen und Werkzeuge fur wissensbasierte Systeme.

  • Daniel, M. and Striebel, D. (1990).Humanorientierte Gestaltung von Zukunftsszenarien und Gestaltungshinweise. Forschungsbericht. ibek, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, J., Dzida, W., and Herda, S. (1983). The role of excursions in interactiveMan-Mashine-Studies, 18, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (1979).What Computers can't do. The Limit of Artificial Intelligence. Revised edition (1st ed. 1972). Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L., Dreyfus, S. E., and Athanasiou, T. (1986).Mind over Maschine. The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, E. A. (1981). Adaptive Man-Computer Interfaces, in Coombs and Alty (ed).Computing Skills and User Interfaces. 389–426. Academic Press.

  • Edmonds, E. A., O'Brien, S. M. Bayley, T., and McDaid, E. (1993). Constructing end-user knowledge manipulation systems, inInt. J. Man-Machine Studies, 38, 51–70. Academic Press.

  • El-Najdawi, M. K. and Stylianou, A. C. (1993). Expert support systems. Integrating AI Technologies, inCoACM. 36 (12). ACM. 55–103.

  • Ellis, C. (1989). Explanation in intelligent systems, in Ellis (ed).Expert Knowledge and Explanation. 108–126. John Wiley Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnas, G.W. (1986). Generalized Fisheye Views, in Mantei, Orbeton, (eds) Proc. CHI '86. 16–23. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1965).Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Mohr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, M. and Sprenger, M. (1988). Semantic Interpretation of Pragmatic Clues. Connectives, Modal Verbs, and Indirect Speech Acts.Proc. Cooling. Universität Hamburg. (Projekt WISBER). Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göranzon, B. (1988). The Practice of the Use of Computers. A Paradoxical Encounter between Different Traditions of Knowledge, in Göranzon and Josefson (1988).Knowledge, Skill and Artificial Intelligence. 9–18. Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R. (1992). Erfahrung, Intuition, Diskursives Denken und Künstliche Intelligenz als Grundlage ärztlicher Erntscheidungen, in Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse Jahrgang 1992, 3, 291–314. Springer, Abhandlung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, P., Ball, E., and Reddy, R. (1981). Breaking the Man-Machine Communication Barrier, inComputer,3(81), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Roth, F. and Jacobstein, N. (1994). The State of Knowledge-Based Systems, in CoACM. 37 (3), 27–39.

  • Hensel, G. (1993). Die Euphorie ist vorbei, inDiebold Management Report Nr. 5-93. 15–19.

  • Hermann, T. (1986).Zur Gestaltung der Mensch-Computer-Interaktion. Systemerklärung als kommunikatives Problem. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, T. (1992). Support of Intervening Use, in Brödner and Karwowski (eds). Ergonomics of Hybrid Automated Systems III. 289–294. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagodzinski, A. P. (1983). A theoretical basis for the representation of on-line computer systems to naive users, inInt. J. of Man-Machine-Studies No. 18. 215–252.

  • Janetzko, D., Wess, S., and Melis, E. (1992). Goal-Driven Similarity Assessment, in Ohlbach (ed). GWAI-92Advances in AI. 245–254. Springer, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, A. L. (1985a). What do users ask?-Some thoughts on diagnostic advice, in Merry, M. (ed).ES '85. Proc. 5th Tesection Conf. British Computer Society, Expert Systems. 9–19.

  • Kidd, A. L. (1985b). The consultative role of an expert system, in Johnson and Cook (eds).People and Computers. Designing the Interface. 248–254. British Informatics Society.

  • Kobsa, A. and Wahlster, W. (1989). User Models in Dialog Systems, in Kobsa and Wahlster (eds).User Models in Dialog Systems. 4–33. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriegsmann, M. and Barletta, R. (1993). Building a Case-Based Help Desk Application, inIEEE Expert, December 1993, 18–26.

  • Ladwig, B. and Mellis, W. (1987). Negative Erklärungen in einem EMYCIN-artigen Expertensystem Shell, in Balzert et al.Expertensysteme '87. 150–168. Teubner, Stutgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlotz, C. P. and Shortliffe, E. H. (1983). Adapting a consultation system to critique user plans, inInt. J. Man-Machine Studies. 19. 479–496.

  • March, J. (1991). How Decisions Happen in Organization, inHuman-Computer Interaction. 6(2), 95–117.

  • Oatley, K. (1990). Wozu brauchen wir Gefühle? inPsychologie Heute, 1(90), 30–35.

  • Oberquelle, H. (1993). Anpaßbarkeit von Groupware als Basis fur die dynamische Gestaltung von computergestützter Gruppenarbeit, in Konradt and Drisis (eds).Software-Ergonomische in der Gruppenarbeit. 37–54. Leske+Buderich, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesterreich, R. and Voplert, W. (1986). Task Analysis for Work Design on the Basis of Action Regulation Theory, inEconomic and Industrial Democracy. 7, 503–527. SAGE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H. (1992). EXPLORE—Interface Building beyond the Interface, in Brödner and Karwowski (eds). Ergonomics of Hybrid Automated Systems-III. Proc. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H. (1995).Exploratives Agieren Ein Beitrag zur ergonomischen Gestaltung interaktiver Systeme. Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piel, H. and Friedrichs, H. (1989). GENO-STAR, in IBM Nachrichten 39 Special 1, 38–41.

  • Polanyi, M. (1985). Implizites Wissen. Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poltrock, S. E., Steiner, D.D., and Tarlton, P.N. (1986). Graphic Interfaces for Knowledge-Based System Development, in Mantei and Orbeton (eds). Human Factors in Computing Systems III.Proc. CHI '86 Conf., 9–15. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppe, F. (1987). Diagnostik-Expertensysteme, inInformatik-Spektrum. 10, 293–308.

  • Puppe, F. (1990).Problemlösungsmethoden in Expertensystemen. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector, A.L., Newton, P.D., and Marsden, P.H. (1985). What kind of system does an expert need?, inPeople and computers. Designing the interface. British Informatics Society. 239–247.

  • Ryle, G. (1945).The concept of mind. Hammondsworth.

  • Silverman, B. G. (1992). Survey of Expert Critiquing Systems. Practical and Theoretical Frontiers, inCoACM, April 1992, 35(4), 106–127.

  • Stanojevic, M., Vranes, S., and Velasevic, D. (1994). Using Truth Maintenance Systems—A Tutorial, inIEEE Expert, December 1994. 46–56.

  • Trigg, R., Moran, T., and Halasz, F. (1987). Adaptability and Tailoring in NoteCards, in Bullinger and Shackel (eds).HCI-INTERACT '87, 723–728. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpert, W. (1987). Kontrastive Analyse des Verhältnisses von Mensch und Rechner als Grundlage des System-Designs, inZeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 41, 147–152.

  • Wahlster, W. (1981).Natürlichsprachliche Argumentation in Dialogsystemen. deKl-Verfahren zur Rekonstruktion und Erklärung approximaler Inferenzprozesse. Berlin. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, J. (1994). Expertensysteme und die Organisierung von Expertenarbeit, in (Beckeret al. 1994). 23–48.

  • Wess, S., Althoff, K. D., Maurer, F., Paulokat, J., Praeger, R., and Wendel, O. (eds) (1992). Fallbasiertes SchlieBen-Eine Übersicht(Band I–III), inSEKI-Working Paper, 92, 8–10. Universitat Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weth, R. van der (1994). Konstruieren. Heuristische Kompetenz, Erfahrung und individuelles Vorgehen, in Z.f. Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie. 38. (N.F.12) 3(94), 102–111.

  • Wielinga, B., Schreiber, G., and Breuker, J. A. (1991). A Modelling Approach to Knowledge Engineering, inKADS-II Report. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel, S. (1987). Design Goals for Sloppy Modeling Systems. In: Proc. AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Banff. Oct. 1987.

  • Yetim, F. (1994). Zur Transparenz wissensbasierter Systeme—Trends und Stand der Forschung bei Erklärungskomponenten, inNfD 45, 1994. 291–297.

  • Zapf, D., Brodbeck, F. C., Frese, M., and Prümper, J. (1992). Errors in working with office computers. A first validation of a taxonomy of observed errors in a field setting. inInt. J. of Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 311–339.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hermann, T., Just, K. Experts' systems instead of expert systems. AI & Soc 9, 321–355 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210586

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210586

Keywords