Skip to main content

Simulating Perceptions of Security

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Security Protocols XXV (Security Protocols 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 10476))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 619 Accesses

Abstract

Systems complicated enough to have ongoing security issues are difficult to understand, and hard to model. The models are hard to understand, even when they are right (another reason they are usually wrong), and too complicated to use to make decisions.

Instead attackers, developers, and users make security decisions based on their perceptions of the system, and not on properties that the system actually has. These perceptions differ between communities, causing decisions made by one community to appear irrational to another.

Attempting to predict such irrational behaviour by basing a model of perception on a model of the system is even more complicated than the original modelling problem we can’t solve. Ockham’s razor says to model the perceptions directly, since these will be simpler than the system itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Netherlands)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (Netherlands)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 54.49
Price includes VAT (Netherlands)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘system’ as employed here includes a computer’s operating system, as well as any countermeasures such as antivirus and other programs, and mobile and other inter-connected devices. Our argument applies to all of these.

  2. 2.

    cf. [1].

  3. 3.

    http://www.comparemymobile.com/, accessed 11 October 2016.

  4. 4.

    Many commercial organisations test updates received from suppliers before distributing them to their user base, a protection unavailable to the private user.

  5. 5.

    Manny Lehman, conversation with Paul Wernick, 1997.

References

  1. Christianson, B.: Living in an impossible world: real-izing the consequences of intransitive trust. Philos. Technol. 26(4), 411–429 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, S., Blaze, M., Smith, J.: Blood in the water: are there honeymoon effects outside software? In: Christianson, B., Malcolm, J. (eds.) Security Protocols 2010. LNCS, vol. 7061, pp. 12–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45921-8_4

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leverett, E., Clayton, R., Anderson, R.: Standardisation and certification of the ‘Internet of Things’. In: Proceedings of WEIS 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murayama, Y., Fujihara, Y., Nishioka, D.: The sense of security and a countermeasure for the false sense. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Malcolm, J., Stajano, F. (eds.) Security Protocols 2011. LNCS, vol. 7114, pp. 205–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25867-1_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson, D.: Windows 10 backlash: which? demands compo for forced upgrades; The Register (2016). www.theregister.co.uk/2016/09/22/windows_10_backlash_begins_which_calls_for_upgrade_compensation/. Accessed 21 Nov 2016

  6. System Dynamics Society: What is System Dynamics? (2016). http://www.systemdynamics.org/what-is-s/. Accessed 7 Dec 2016

  7. Tepper, F.: Updating to iOS 10 is bricking some iPhones and iPads; TechCrunch (2016). https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/13/updating-to-ios-10-is-bricking-some-iphones-and-ipads/. Accessed 11 Oct 2016

  8. Thomas, D.R., Beresford, A.R., Coudray, T., Sutcliffe, T., Taylor, A.: The lifetime of android api vulnerabilities: case study on the javascript-to-java interface. In: Christianson, B., Švenda, P., Matyáš, V., Malcolm, J., Stajano, F., Anderson, J. (eds.) Security Protocols 2015. LNCS, vol. 9379, pp. 126–138. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26096-9_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ventana Systems, Inc. (2016). https://vensim.com/. Accessed 7 Dec 2016

  10. Wernick, P., Lehman, M.M.: Software process dynamic modelling for FEAST/1. J. Syst. Softw. 46, 193–201 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Wernick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wernick, P., Christianson, B., Spring, J. (2017). Simulating Perceptions of Security. In: Stajano, F., Anderson, J., Christianson, B., Matyáš, V. (eds) Security Protocols XXV. Security Protocols 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10476. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71075-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics