Abstract
Educational robotics has gained increased importance and attention worldwide as an excellent teaching tool for STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics). However, catching the enthusiasm of young learners who are not already interested in STEM remains challenging. In this paper, we describe our outreach concept where young people from Vienna and surroundings visit the technical university with their teachers for a three-hour program. Our focus is on technological literacy, the understanding of what a robot is and how it works and may look like, as well as different robotic application areas. Theory and hands-on are combined in an age-appropriate concept based on constructivism. In order to evaluate our approach, we have developed a short post-questionnaire. Our results with 255 young people ages 7 to 17 show that after the visit 84% are more interested in technology and 80% are more interested in robotics. 85% of the young learners find that robots are complex machines after the visit. Despite that fact, 85% of those who find robots complex are more interested in robotics, 85% want to come back to learn more about robotics, and 91% will tell their families about these activities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mead, R.A., Thomas, S.L., Weinberg, J.B.: From grade school to grad school: an integrated STEM pipeline model through robotics. In: Robots in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning, pp. 302–325. IGI Global (2012)
Bredenfeld, A., Leimbach, T.: The roberta initiative. In: Workshop Proceedings of International Conference on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots, (SIMPAR 2010), pp. 558–567 (2010)
Yudin, A., Salmina, M., Sukhotskiy, V., Dessimoz, J.-D.: Mechatronics practice in education step by step, workshop on mobile robotics. In: Proceedings of 47th International Symposium on Robotics, ISR 2016, pp. 1–8 (2016)
Norton, S.J.: Using Lego construction to develop ratio understanding. Math. Educ. Third Millenn. Towards 2010, 414–421 (2004)
Williams, D.C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M.J., Lai, G.: Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 40(2), 201–216 (2007)
Catlin, D., Woollard, J.: Educational robots and computational thinking. In: Proceedings of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, pp. 144–151 (2014)
Rogers, C.: Engineering in kindergarten: how schools are changing. J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res. 13(4), 4 (2012)
Wolz, U.: Teaching design and project management with Lego RCX robots. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 33(1), 95–99 (2001)
Chambers, J.M., Carbonaro, M., Murray, H.: Developing conceptual understanding of mechanical advantage through the use of Lego robotic technology. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 24(4) (2008)
Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2012)
Feil-Seifer, D., Matarić, M.J.: Human robot human–robot interaction (HRI). In: Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, pp. 4643–4659. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Hamner, E., Lauwers, T., Bernstein, D., Stubbs, K., Crowley, K., Nourbakhsh, I.: Robot diaries interim project report: development of a technology program for middle school girls (2008)
Alimisis, D.: Educational robotics: open questions and new challenges. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 6(1), 63–71 (2013)
Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G.: Evaluating the impact of educational robotics on pupils’ technical-and social-skills and science related attitudes. Robot. Auton. Syst. 75, 679–685 (2016)
Piaget, J., Inhelder, B.: The Psychology of the Child London, Henley Roudedge Kegan Paul (1969)
Montessori, M.: The Montessori Method, Rome 1912 (1964)
Bruner, J.S.: The Process of Education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1980)
Thomas, M., Weigend, M.: Informatik und Natur: 6. Münsteraner Workshop zur Schulinformatik, 1. Aufl. Books on Demand (2014)
Honebein, P.C., Duffy, T.M., Fishman, B.J.: Constructivism and the design of learning environments: context and authentic activities for learning. In: Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, pp. 87–108. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Kramer-Bottiglio, R.: Intersecting Self-Efficacy and Interest: Exploring the Impact of Soft Robot Design Experiences on Engineering Perceptions (2018)
Britner, S.L., Pajares, F.: Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students. J. Res. Sci. Teach. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. Res. Sci. Teach. 43(5), 485–499 (2006)
Ornstein, A.: The frequency of hands-on experimentation and student attitudes toward science: a statistically significant relation (2005-51-Ornstein). J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 15(3–4), 285–297 (2006)
Foley, B.J., McPhee, C.: Students’ attitudes towards science in classes using hands-on or textbook based curriculum. Am. Educ. Res. Assoc. (2008)
Dabney, K.P., et al.: Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. Int. J. Sci. Educ. Part B 2(1), 63–79 (2012)
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., Bögeholz, S.: Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Res. Sci. Educ. 40(5), 743–757 (2010)
Jäggle, G., Lepuschitz, W., Girvan, C., Schuster, L., Ayatollahi, I., Vincze, M.: Overview and evaluation of a workshop series for fostering the interest in entrepreneurship and STEM. In: 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), pp. 89–94 (2018)
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42(3–4), 143–166 (2003)
Lammer, L., Weiss, A., Vincze, M.: The 5-step plan: a holistic approach to investigate children’s ideas on future robotic products. In: International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, Bamberg (2015)
Acknowledgements
The Outreach Program is sponsored by the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology at the TU Wien. We would like to thank Habibe Idiskut, Markus Ortner, Martin Piehslinger, and Jan-Ove Wiesner for their help in carrying out the workshops and collecting the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jäggle, G., Lammer, L., Hieber, H., Vincze, M. (2020). Technological Literacy Through Outreach with Educational Robotics. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1023. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26944-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26945-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)Springer Nature Proceedings excluding Computer Science