Skip to main content

Enhanced Temporal Difference Learning Using Compiled Eligibility Traces

  • Conference paper
AI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4304))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Eligibility traces have been shown to substantially improve the convergence speed of temporal difference learning algorithms, by maintaining a record of recently experienced states. This paper presents an extension of conventional eligibility traces (compiled traces) which retain additional information about the agent’s experience within the environment. Empirical results show that compiled traces outperform conventional traces when applied to policy evaluation tasks using a tabular representation of the state values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sutton, R.S.: Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences. Machine Learning 3, 9–44 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh, S.P., Sutton, R.S.: Reinforcement learning with replacing eligibility traces. Machine Learning 22, 123–158 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Rummery, G., Niranjan, M.: On-line Q-Learning Using Connectionist Systems. Cambridge University Engineering Department, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Watkins, C.J.C.H.: Learning from Delayed Rewards, PhD Thesis, Cambridge University (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sutton, R.S.: Dyna, an integrated architecture for learning, planning and reacting. SIGART Bulletin 2, 160–163 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaelbling, L.P.: Learning to Achieve Goals. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chambéry, France (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ollington, R., Vamplew, P.: Concurrent Q-Learning for Autonomous Mapping and Navigation. In: The 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Singapore (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaakkola, T., Jordan, M.I., Singh, S.P.: On the convergence of stochastic iterative dynamic programming algorithms. Neural Computation 6, 1185–1201 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cichosz, P.: Truncating temporal differences: On the efficient implementation of TD(λ) for reinforcement learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2, 287–318 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sutton, R.S.: Generalisation in reinforcement learning: Successful examples using sparse coarse coding. In: Touretzky, D.S., Mozer, M.C., Hasselmo, M.E. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: Proceedings of the 1995 Conference, pp. 1038–1044. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kretchmar, R.M., Anderson, C.W.: Comparison of CMACs and RBFs for local function approximators in reinforcement learning. In: IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vamplew, P., Ollington, R., Hepburn, M. (2006). Enhanced Temporal Difference Learning Using Compiled Eligibility Traces. In: Sattar, A., Kang, Bh. (eds) AI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4304. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11941439_18

Download citation

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Publish with us

Policies and ethics