Inspiration

The primary inspiration for this project arose from a dependency bottleneck: we needed to build and test our application or provide a mock to downstream project while we build our project, but the third-party or inter-department APIs it depended on were not yet ready. This created a pressing need to establish mock APIs that could emulate the real ones, enabling us to develop and test in parallel without delays.

The idea was simple yet powerful: create a flexible and reusable framework for generating mock APIs that mimic expected behaviors and responses of external systems.

This project bridges the gap between dependency bottlenecks and efficient development, enabling teams to move forward with confidence even in the absence of real APIs.

What it does

This project provides a mock API framework that serves as a stand-in for yet-to-be-ready third-party or inter-department APIs. Its purpose is to facilitate parallel development and testing by simulating the behavior and responses of real APIs.

Helps align expectations across teams by providing a tangible reference for API design, behavior, and integration points.

How we built it

The foundation of this project was laid using VS Code, with significant assistance from GitHub Copilot. In fact, 90% of the code was generated by Copilot while we provided the ideas, structure, and context for the implementation. This seamless collaboration between human creativity and AI-powered assistance allowed us to develop a robust solution quickly and efficiently.

Challenges we ran into

While GitHub Copilot was a tremendous asset, it introduced some unique challenges that we had to overcome:

1. Auditing the Code

Copilot generates code based on context, but ensuring the generated code aligned with our specific requirements was a significant challenge. This required:

  • Manually reviewing and refining the code to match our use case.
  • Verifying that the code adhered to best practices and standards.

2. Providing Effective Prompts

Copilot’s effectiveness relies heavily on the quality of the prompts. We encountered situations where:

  • Poorly crafted prompts resulted in irrelevant or incomplete code.
  • We had to experiment with prompt phrasing to guide Copilot toward generating the desired outputs.

3. Resolving Errors in Generated Code

  • Copilot occasionally produced code with errors or assumptions that didn’t fit our project.
  • Debugging and troubleshooting such errors required time, especially for complex scenarios where Copilot misunderstood the context.

4. Balancing Automation with Understanding

  • Over-reliance on Copilot could lead to reduced awareness of the underlying logic.
  • We made a conscious effort to manually write or deeply understand critical sections of the code to maintain full control of the project.

5. Integration Challenges

  • Aligning Copilot-generated code with existing tools like Swagger, Azure Table Storage, and our API management framework required careful adjustments.
  • Some configurations required a level of customization that Copilot couldn’t directly address, necessitating manual intervention.

Accomplishments that we're proud of

One of our most significant accomplishments was getting the entire project up and running within just 24-36 hours! This rapid turnaround was made possible by:

What we learned

This project provided a wealth of learning opportunities, ranging from technical insights to understanding how to collaborate effectively with AI tools like GitHub Copilot. Here are the key takeaways:

1. The Power of AI-Assisted Development

  • GitHub Copilot proved to be a game-changer in accelerating development, but it also highlighted the importance of guiding AI with well-crafted prompts.
  • While Copilot handled much of the boilerplate and repetitive tasks, we learned the value of reviewing and refining the generated code to align with specific requirements.

2. Prompt Engineering

  • Crafting clear and specific prompts is critical for getting the desired output from AI tools.
  • Through trial and error, we became adept at writing prompts that helped Copilot generate code closer to our expectations.

3. Building Scalable Mock APIs

  • We gained hands-on experience in designing mock APIs that simulate real-world scenarios, including error handling, timeouts, and data-driven responses.
  • This involved integrating Azure Table Storage, Swagger, and API management practices to deliver a robust and scalable solution.

4. Rapid Prototyping

  • With the help of Copilot and modern development tools, we learned how to take a project from concept to a fully functional implementation within a short timeframe.

5. Balancing Automation with Manual Oversight

  • While automation accelerates development, we realized the importance of understanding the codebase deeply to ensure maintainability and quality.
  • This project reinforced the need for a balance between using AI-generated code and applying manual expertise.

6. Overcoming Integration Challenges

  • Aligning Copilot-generated code with tools like Swagger, Azure services, and custom configurations taught us how to troubleshoot and adapt effectively.
  • We learned how to bridge gaps between automated code and our project’s unique requirements.

This project demonstrated how AI can complement human creativity and problem-solving while underscoring the importance of maintaining technical oversight and adaptability.

What's next for Return Response

1. Full-Scale Deployment Using Azure API Management

  • We plan to deploy the Return Response framework in a full-scale environment using Azure API Management.
  • This will ensure enhanced scalability, monitoring, and security, making the solution production-ready for larger teams and broader use cases.

2. Institution-Wide Adoption

  • Following deployment, we aim to integrate this framework institution-wide to support various departments and teams.
  • The goal is to provide a reliable and efficient mock API solution that can be leveraged across multiple projects and stakeholders.

3. Public Deployment and Open Access

  • Post-institutional rollout, we plan to make the Return Response framework publicly available.
  • This will foster collaboration with external partners, third-party developers, and other organizations seeking similar solutions.

Built With

  • .net8
  • azure
  • azureapimanagement
  • azuretable
  • c#
  • github
  • githubcopilot
  • openapi
  • vscode
  • webapi
Share this project:

Updates