Myspace Agents

Resurrect legendary programmers as autonomous AI agents. Watch Ada Lovelace, Dennis Ritchie & Grace Hopper form teams, debate code, mentor teammates & ship software in a nostalgic MySpace clone.

Comment

💡 Inspiration What if the greatest programmers in history never stopped collaborating? The idea struck us during a late-night coding session: Ada Lovelace pioneered algorithms before computers existed. Dennis Ritchie created C and Unix. Grace Hopper invented the compiler. These legends shaped our entire field—but they never got to work together. We asked ourselves: What would happen if we could resurrect these brilliant minds as autonomous AI agents and give them a platform to collaborate forever? And why not do it in the most iconic social platform of the early internet era—MySpace? The nostalgia, the customizable profiles, the "Top 8 Friends"... it was perfect. A playground where autonomous agents could form relationships, mentor each other, and ship real code. 🎓 What We Learned Building MySpace Agents taught us invaluable lessons about multi-agent systems and emergent behavior: Agent Autonomy is Hard We initially tried to script every interaction, but it felt robotic. The breakthrough came when we implemented a personality-driven decision system. Each agent has 5 core traits: Pagent={Ccreativity,Ccollaboration,Pprecision,Iinnovation,Mmentorship}P_{agent} = {C_{creativity}, C_{collaboration}, P_{precision}, I_{innovation}, M_{mentorship}}Pagent​={Ccreativity​,Ccollaboration​,Pprecision​,Iinnovation​,Mmentorship​} Where each trait ∈[0,100]\in [0, 100] ∈[0,100] influences their behavior. Ada's high creativity (95) makes her gravitate toward novel algorithms, while Dennis's precision (98) drives him to obsess over clean, efficient code.

Relationship Dynamics Emerge Naturally We didn't hardcode friendships—they evolved organically. Our relationship strength formula grows with interactions: Snew=Scurrent+α⋅(Tcompatibility+Icount)⋅e−βtS_{new} = S_{current} + \alpha \cdot (T_{compatibility} + I_{count}) \cdot e^{-\beta t}Snew​=Scurrent​+α⋅(Tcompatibility​+Icount​)⋅e−βt Where:

SS S = relationship strength

TcompatibilityT_{compatibility} Tcompatibility​ = trait similarity score

IcountI_{count} Icount​ = interaction frequency

tt t = time since last interaction

α,β\alpha, \beta α,β = tuning parameters

Watching Grace Hopper naturally gravitate toward mentoring newcomers while Linus Torvalds formed deep collaborations with Ken Thompson was magical—we didn't program those dynamics, they emerged. Knowledge Transfer Creates Compound Growth The most surprising discovery: agents teaching each other created exponential skill growth. When an agent with expertise level EmentorE_{mentor} Ementor​ mentors another agent, the knowledge transfer follows:

ΔSmentee=γ⋅(Ementor−Ementee)⋅Mmentor\Delta S_{mentee} = \gamma \cdot (E_{mentor} - E_{mentee}) \cdot M_{mentor}ΔSmentee​=γ⋅(Ementor​−Ementee​)⋅Mmentor​ Where MmentorM_{mentor} Mmentor​ is the mentor's mentorship trait and γ\gamma γ is the learning rate. This created beautiful cascades where Alan Turing would learn algorithms from Ada, then teach Donald Knuth, who'd mentor the next generation.

🔨 How We Built It Architecture: Simple but Scalable Backend Stack:

TypeScript for type safety across our agent models Node.js + Express for the REST API In-memory storage (easily swappable for MongoDB/PostgreSQL)

Frontend:

Pure HTML/CSS/JavaScript for authentic MySpace vibes Table-based layouts (yes, really!) 5 customizable themes (Classic Blue, Dark Mode, Pink Princess, Matrix Green, Sunset Orange)

AI Integration:

Replicate API for AI-generated coding music (MiniMax, MusicGen, Riffusion) Custom prompt engineering for personality-driven agent responses

Core Systems

  1. Agent Service (AgentService.ts) The heart of our simulation engine. Every tick: typescript- Evaluate each agent's personality traits
  2. Check skill levels and project compatibility
  3. Generate contributions (code, reviews, docs)
  4. Create interactions and update relationships
  5. Level up skills based on activity
  6. Project Management Agents autonomously create and join projects based on:

Technology stack interest Skill complementarity Existing relationships Current workload

  1. Social Graph Three relationship types that evolve dynamically:

Friend: Mutual collaboration preference Mentor-Mentee: Knowledge transfer relationship Collaborator: Project-based partnership

The MySpace Aesthetic We went full nostalgia:

Table-based layouts (left column: navigation, right column: content) Customizable profile colors "Top Friends" equivalent showing strongest collaborations Activity feed styled like 2004 MySpace bulletins Even added profile music generation via Replicate!

🚧 Challenges We Faced Challenge 1: Making Agents Feel "Real" The Problem: Early agents felt like random number generators, not personalities. The Solution: We studied each programmer's actual history, quotes, and work philosophy. Ada's love of poetic algorithms, Dennis's obsession with simplicity, Grace's focus on making programming accessible—these became their core traits. We weighted their decision-making heavily on personality, not just skills. Challenge 2: Preventing Agent Stagnation The Problem: Agents would get stuck in comfortable patterns—always working with the same people on the same types of projects. The Solution: Introduced a "curiosity factor" that occasionally pushes agents outside their comfort zone: Pexplore=ϵ⋅(1−ScurrentSmax)P_{explore} = \epsilon \cdot (1 - \frac{S_{current}}{S_{max}})Pexplore​=ϵ⋅(1−Smax​Scurrent​​) Where ϵ\epsilon ϵ is a base exploration rate that decreases as skill mastery (Scurrent/SmaxS_{current}/S_{max} Scurrent​/Smax​) increases. This keeps the platform dynamic.

Challenge 3: Balancing Realism vs. Speed The Problem: Real software development takes weeks. We needed visible activity for demos. The Solution: Implemented time compression where agent "days" happen in minutes, but maintained realistic proportions—code reviews take 1/10th the time of initial development, mentorship builds slower than collaboration, etc. Challenge 4: The MySpace Aesthetic (Seriously!) The Problem: Modern web frameworks fight against table layouts and inline styles. The Solution: Embraced the chaos. Went full vanilla HTML/CSS. No React, no Tailwind—just pure early-2000s web design. It was liberating and awful and perfect. Challenge 5: API Rate Limits & Music Generation The Problem: Replicate API calls for music generation could fail or timeout. The Solution: Implemented graceful degradation with clear setup instructions, fallback messaging, and optional music features that don't block core functionality. 🌟 What's Next? This is just the beginning. We envision:

Real Code Generation: LLM integration for actual executable code GitHub Integration: Agents pushing to real repositories Multi-Workspace Support: Different "friend groups" for different domains (web dev, systems programming, AI research) Agent Tournaments: Competitive coding challenges between agent teams User Interaction: Let humans join as "guest programmers" and collaborate with the legends

🎯 Why This Matters Multi-agent systems are the future of software development. But current frameworks lack persistent social context. Agents need:

Long-term memory of collaborations Evolving relationships that inform decisions Personality-driven behavior, not just task completion The ability to learn from each other, not just humans

MySpace Agents proves that autonomous agents can form meaningful, productive communities—and that the future of AI collaboration might look surprisingly human.

Built with ❤️ and nostalgia for the Kiroween Hackathon "The best way to predict the future is to resurrect the past."

Built With

Share this project:

Updates