Dead Wild Roses

The DWR Friday Baroque Interlude – Bach – Sanfte soll mein Todeskummer from Easter Oratorio BWV 249 | Netherlands Bach Society

April 3, 2026 in Music | Tags: Easter, The DWR Friday Baroque Interlude - Bach - Sanfte soll mein Todeskummer from Easter Oratorio BWV 249 | Netherlands Bach Society | by The Arbourist | Leave a comment

This is Peter’s aria in the Easter Oratorio, sung just after he sees Jesus’ burial cloth lying in the empty tomb. In the preceding recitative, Peter says he sees the Schweisstuch “lying unwrapped,” and the aria turns that sight into a personal meditation on death and resurrection. (Bachvereniging)

A natural English rendering would be:

“May the sorrow of my death be gentle, only a sleep, Jesus, because of your burial cloth. Yes, that will refresh me there and tenderly wipe the tears of my suffering from my cheeks.” (Bachvereniging)

A couple of small nuances matter here.
“Todeskummer” is not just “death” in the abstract, but the grief, anguish, or distress bound up with dying. “Schlummer” is lighter than full sleep: more like slumber or restful dozing. And “Schweisstuch” can be rendered as shroud, face cloth, or burial cloth; in context it is the cloth Peter sees in the tomb, now transformed into a sign that death has been overcome. (Bachvereniging)

What the aria means

The basic idea is very beautiful: because Christ has risen, the believer’s own death is no longer imagined as terror or final ruin, but as something softened into sleep. Peter is not singing triumphantly here. He is drawing consolation from the Resurrection and applying it to his own mortality. That inward, reflective quality is part of the work’s design; this oratorio is not only about Easter joy, but about what the Resurrection means for the human person at death. (The Classical Source)

Musical summary

Musically, the aria is gentle, rocking, and consoling rather than brilliant or extrovert. One critic describes it as a soft lullaby, with rippling strings and flutes and very little obvious beat, so the texture feels smooth and soothing rather than sharply rhythmic. Another listener highlights the blend of violins and recorders and hears in it “joy, comfort in and against death and suffering.” (The Classical Source)

So the emotional color is not “Easter trumpet blaze.” It is more intimate: death reimagined as sleep, grief being wiped away, and the empty tomb becoming a source of personal calm. That is why the aria feels so tender. It sits at the contemplative heart of the Easter Oratorio. (The Classical Source)

For Easter weekend, a small and lovely Bach choice: “Sanfte soll mein Todeskummer” from the Easter Oratorio (BWV 249). Not triumph first, but consolation — death softened into sleep by the Resurrection. Baroque piety at its most tender.

We’ve Been Living the Asch Experiment – “Progressive Coercion from Transactivists”

April 2, 2026 in Gender Issues, Psychology, Public Policy | Tags: Gender Ideology, Reality Denial, Social Conformity, Solomon Asch, Speech Coercion, Transgender ideology, Women’s Boundaries | by The Arbourist | 2 comments

Solomon Asch’s conformity experiments were brutally simple. One person sits with a unanimous group. Two lines of obviously different lengths appear. The group confidently gives the wrong answer. Around 75% of participants conformed at least once. On the critical trials, they went along with the false answer roughly one-third of the time. In the control condition, with no group pressure, errors were almost nonexistent.

That experiment did not stay in the lab.

We now run it as social policy.

A plainly male person enters a female space or female category, and everyone nearby is expected to override what their eyes and judgment are reporting. Not because the evidence is subtle. Because the penalty for stating the obvious has been made artificially high: bigot, transphobe, career risk, social isolation, institutional discipline.

That is the test.

The point is not that everyone believes the lie. The point is that enough people comply in public to make it feel socially mandatory. That is how conformity works: not by proving a falsehood, but by punishing dissent until visible reality becomes something people are afraid to name.

“He knew better. He gave the group answer anyway.”

And the clearer the mismatch, the harsher the demand for submission. Non-passing males are not an embarrassment to this ideology. They are its purest form. They force the conformity trial into the open. The more obvious the contradiction, the more intensely the crowd must insist that you deny it.

Malcolm Gladwell recently handed the game away. Reflecting on his 2022 MIT panel on trans athletes, he admitted he was “ashamed” because he shared Ross Tucker’s position “100%” and was “cowed.” He knew better. He gave the group answer anyway.

That is the real Asch lesson of our time. Social coercion does not need universal belief. It only needs enough fearful public compliance to make reality itself feel socially dangerous.

Call male female, or pay the price.

That is not compassion. It is organized conformity.

Sources:

Solomon E. Asch, “Opinions and Social Pressure,” Scientific American 193, no. 5 (1955). Classic summary of the line-judgment conformity experiments. Asch reports that in the critical condition, about one-third of judgments shifted toward the erroneous majority, while control-group errors were virtually absent.
OpenLearn (The Open University), “Starting with psychology: 5.3 Groups and conformity.” Useful summary of Asch’s original findings, including that 75 percent of participants conformed to an obviously wrong answer at least once.
Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Conformity” and “Normative influence.” Helpful for the distinction your piece relies on: conformity can involve public compliance without private acceptance, which fits your argument that the mechanism is outward submission under pressure rather than sincere belief.
For the Gladwell reference: The Real Science of Sport podcast follow-up notes confirm that Gladwell apologized for how he handled the 2022 MIT Sloan panel, and contemporaneous reporting quotes him saying he shared Ross Tucker’s position “100%” and was “cowed.”

The Morning Canada Woke Up

April 1, 2026 in Canada, Culture, Public Policy | Tags: April Fools, Canada, DEI, Free Speech, Gender Ideology, satire, Women’s Spaces | by The Arbourist | 1 comment

I woke this morning to the sort of silence one usually associates with miracles or the CBC losing funding. It was not the usual Canadian silence of people muttering “well, that’s concerning” while being mugged by ideology in a Lululemon hoodie. No. It was the silence that comes after a fever breaks.

By breakfast, the first signs were impossible to miss. Gender ideology had finally been moved to its proper shelf: comparative religion. It now sat comfortably beside crystal healing, Gnostic sects, and the more enthusiastic forms of astrology. Canadians, with characteristic politeness, agreed that adults were free to believe in innate gender spirits if they wished. They were simply no longer allowed to drag those beliefs into schools, prisons, women’s shelters, human rights tribunals, or sports governing bodies and demand that everybody else call it science.

Female spaces reverted, almost overnight, to the radical old principle that women are female. Women’s prisons once again housed women. Women’s shelters once again served women. Women’s hospital wards, changing rooms, crisis centres, rape relief services, and athletic categories all quietly recovered their original function. The country did not collapse. No one burst into flames. The sun rose, the buses ran late, and Canadian women experienced the deeply unfamiliar sensation of not having to explain why privacy, fairness, and physical safety were not hate crimes.

“They were replaced by the revolutionary practice of getting on with things.”

Even the sports pages improved. Men were removed from women’s competitions with so little fuss one wondered why the insanity had been allowed to continue so long. Records began to mean something again. Girls stopped being told that getting flattened by male bodies was a teachable moment in inclusion.

Meanwhile, Canada seemed to have recovered from a long and embarrassing binge. DEI offices vanished like travelling carnivals after a municipal scandal. Land acknowledgements were quietly retired from every meeting and kindergarten graduation after the public noticed they had not, in fact, altered land title or improved anyone’s life. They were replaced by the revolutionary practice of getting on with things.

Freedom of speech also made an unexpected return. Not the decorative kind. The real kind. The kind where one could say true or unpopular things without being marched through a moral struggle session by people whose entire personality is a lanyard.

For several glorious hours, the country seemed almost curable.

Then I remembered the date.

Happy April Fool’s Day.

The Questions Canadian Media Refuse to Ask

March 31, 2026 in Alberta, Canada, Gender Issues, Media, Politics | Tags: Canada, Gender Ideology, Media Framing, Nova Scotia, Radicalization, School Violence, Selective Curiosity, Tumbler Ridge, Youth Violence | by The Arbourist | Leave a comment

Canadian media know how to do pattern recognition when they want to.

Give them the right suspect, the right ideology, or the right grievance story, and they will produce instant analysis about pathways, warning signs, radicalization, social meaning, and what the event “says” about the culture. But let violence intersect with a politically protected identity category, and the appetite for explanation suddenly disappears.

That is the real story here.

A youth in Nova Scotia is accused in a foiled school attack plot involving online coordination, handwritten plans, imitation weapons, hate symbols, and threats. Weeks earlier, Canada saw the Tumbler Ridge massacre, one of the country’s rare school-linked mass shootings, carried out by a trans-identified male with prior mental-health-related police contacts. Two cases do not prove some grand law. They do, however, justify a question. When identity disturbance, grievance, alienation, and violence begin to cluster, are we allowed to notice, or does the conversation get shut down the moment the demographic becomes inconvenient?

That question is treated as indecent when it should be treated as basic public seriousness.

The point is not that trans identification causes violence. That would be a stupid claim, and an unserious one. The point is that severe identity instability, grievance, social isolation, and moral insulation from scrutiny can form a combustible mix, and our institutions become evasive when gender ideology is somewhere in the picture. They know how to be curious. They simply become selective about when curiosity is allowed.

That selectivity matters because schools are not seminar rooms. They are places where adults are supposed to notice risk before bodies hit the floor.

Instead, the public gets the usual flattening language. Troubled youth. Mental health struggle. Isolated incident. Complex circumstances. All of that may be true as far as it goes. What is missing is any willingness to ask whether a culture that treats identity claims as sacred, untouchable, and morally beyond scrutiny might also be making honest risk assessment harder than it should be. If a young person’s entire psychic life is being organized around grievance, estrangement, fantasy, and a demand that reality ratify the self at all costs, that is not automatically a violence pathway. But it is certainly not nothing.

And yet the moment this territory appears, Canadian media go soft in the head.

“When violence intersects with a protected identity category, Canadian media suddenly lose their appetite for explanation.”

They will interrogate masculinity, whiteness, right-wing pipelines, online extremism, misogyny, colonial resentment, and institutional failure when those frames are available. But when gender ideology may be part of the unstable mix, the analysis collapses into vagueness. Suddenly nobody wants to generalize. Nobody wants to connect dots. Nobody wants to risk saying the wrong thing. The protected category gets narrative shelter that other categories do not receive.

That is not neutrality. It is selective curiosity.

None of this means most gender-distressed youth are violent. Of course they are not. But public safety is not served by pretending that every cluster of instability must be discussed in the most generic terms possible just because one part of the profile has become politically delicate. Schools, parents, and the public deserve better than ritual euphemism after every near miss or body count.

The issue is not a proven demographic pattern. The issue is that when violence and identity pathology appear together inside a protected narrative, Canadian media suddenly lose their nerve. They stop asking explanatory questions not because the questions are irrational, but because the answers might offend the wrong people.

And that is how taboo makes serious societies stupider than they can afford to be.

The Lies of Transgender Activists: They Sell You 1966 to Stop 2028

March 30, 2026 in Gender Issues, Politics, Queer Bullshit | Tags: Category Integrity, Fairness in Sport, Female Sport, Gender Ideology, IOC, Safety in Sport, Sex Testing, Women’s Boundaries, World Boxing | by The Arbourist | Leave a comment

This is not argument. It is selective framing used to shut the argument down before it begins.

Yes, sport once used degrading sex tests. The old “nude parade” era was real. Women were subjected to visual and even anatomical examination in the 1960s, and those practices deserved to die. But that is not the current rule. The current activist trick is to drag the ugliest abuses of the past into the frame, staple them to a modern eligibility rule, and hope the reader is too disgusted to notice the switch.

The IOC’s new Olympic rule is not genital inspection of random girls. Reuters reports it is a one-time SRY-gene screen for elite female-category eligibility, using saliva, a cheek swab, or blood, and that it applies from LA 2028 onward to the Olympic pathway, not to amateur sport. Athletes who test positive can still compete in male, mixed, or open categories. That is not barbarism. It is category enforcement.

World Boxing is also not what the tweet implies. Its published policy applies to athletes over 18 in World Boxing-owned or sanctioned events, using a once-in-a-lifetime PCR or equivalent genetic test. Again, this is not “little girls can’t ride a bike without a genital exam.” It is a rule for elite competition in a combat sport where fairness and safety are not decorative concerns.

That is why this rhetoric is dishonest. It does not answer the real question, because the real question is hard: if female sport is a protected sex category, how is that category enforced when eligibility is disputed? Instead of answering that, activists change the subject. They substitute panic imagery, selective history, and moral blackmail. They want “naked parade” and “cheek swab” to feel like the same thing. They are not the same thing.

“A category that cannot be enforced is not protected. It is ornamental.”

The old methods were degrading and scientifically crude. Fine. Then make the process narrower, cleaner, and more private. But do not pretend that the female category can exist on the condition that no one is ever allowed to verify it. A category that cannot be enforced is not protected. It is ornamental. And that is the actual goal of this rhetoric: not to protect women from cruelty, but to make fairness, boundaries, and safety in female sport impossible to defend without first apologizing for something nobody is proposing.

The NDP Has Chosen a Movement, Not a Base: The Radical Choice Avi Lewis

March 29, 2026 in Canada, Politics | Tags: Avi Lewis, Canadian Politics, Energy Policy, Jack Layton, Labour vs Activism, NDP, Political Realignment | by The Arbourist | 2 comments

The election of Avi Lewis as leader of the federal NDP is not a routine leadership change. It is a directional shift, and not a subtle one. Under Jack Layton, the NDP was a labour party first and a movement second. It spoke the language of wages, jobs, unions, and working-class dignity. It was left-wing, yes, but it was still anchored in the material economy Canadians actually live in. Lewis’s NDP flips that order. The organizing principle is no longer the worker. It is the cause.

This is a party moving from social democracy toward activist politics. Look at the priorities. Lewis’s platform centers a Green New Deal framework that treats climate policy not as one file among many, but as the axis around which everything else turns. He has aligned himself with a politics that is openly hostile to new fossil fuel development, including pipelines, LNG expansion, and further oil and gas growth. That has consequences. Canada is not an abstract emissions profile. It is a country where entire regions such as Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland are economically structured around resource extraction. Supply chains stretch across provinces. Public revenues depend on it. A politics that treats those sectors as something to be rapidly wound down is not neutral. It is redistributive by destruction.

“Jack Layton’s NDP tried to defend workers inside the economy Canada actually had. Avi Lewis’s NDP looks far more interested in remaking Canada around activist priorities, even if that means sacrificing the workers and regions that built the party’s old base.”

That is the core rupture. Layton’s NDP tried to expand its coalition by speaking to workers where they were. Lewis’s NDP speaks to them about where they should be. That difference sounds small, but it is not. One builds from existing economic reality. The other attempts to override it. Supporters will argue this is necessary. Climate change is real. Transition is unavoidable. Delaying it increases long-term costs. A Green New Deal promises new jobs, new industries, and a more sustainable economy. There is truth in that. The problem is not whether transition happens. It is how.

A politics that promises that no worker will be left behind while simultaneously targeting the industries that employ those workers is making a timing claim it cannot guarantee. Transitions are not theoretical. They are lived. If replacement industries lag, and they often do, workers do not experience a just transition. They experience unemployment, relocation, or downward mobility. Layton understood that tension and tried to manage it. Lewis appears far more willing to push through it.

There is a second shift, quieter but just as important. Lewis’s politics are deeply embedded in activist networks, including the kind of internationalist cause politics that increasingly dominates sections of the contemporary left. That includes intense pro-Palestinian activism, a space that in recent years has repeatedly struggled, or refused, to draw clean lines between legitimate criticism of Israeli policy and rhetoric or associations that slide into hostility toward Jews as a group. That matters for a national party. Not because criticism of Israel is forbidden, it is not, but because leadership sets tone. When a movement ecosystem blurs those lines, the result is predictable: internal division, public backlash, and the corrosion of trust among voters who still expect a federal party to maintain basic moral clarity. The problem is not criticism. The problem is drift, indulgence, and the refusal to police one’s own side when the language curdles.

The NDP’s historical strength was its credibility with working Canadians. If it becomes seen primarily as a vehicle for activist causes, climate absolutism, movement politics, and international solidarity campaigns, it risks losing that base without replacing it. Urban activists are loud. Workers are numerous. Parties that forget that distinction tend to learn it the hard way.

The NDP has not simply chosen a new leader it has chosen a new radical center of gravity. It has moved from worker-first pragmatism to cause-first transformation, from building within the system to trying to remake it around activist priorities. That is a radical departure from the party of old. And if it fails, it will not be the activists who pay the highest price.

The DWR Sunday Religious Disservice: Taliban Theology of Erasure

March 29, 2026 in Religion | Tags: Afghanistan, Gender Oppression, Islam, Religious Authoritarianism, Sunday Religious Disservice, Taliban, Women's Rights | by The Arbourist | Leave a comment

There are sermons that call men to humility, mercy, and repentance. Then there are sermons like this one: small, cruel, and drunk on power.In August 2025, a sermon by Taliban cleric Mahmood Zakeri circulated widely online. In it, he declared that a woman has no right to walk outside with both eyes open, and that if one eye remains uncovered it may be used only to watch the path, not to look around. He also reaffirmed the rule that women must leave home only with a male guardian.

That is not holiness. It is not modesty. It is the religious language of domination.

The point is not simply to cover women. It is to reduce them. A woman may see, but not look. She may move, but not appear. She may exist, but only under supervision. This is what tyranny looks like when it becomes intimate. It does not stop at law or force. It enters the body, the face, the eyes, and the terms of ordinary presence.

The Taliban’s rule over women has followed this logic from the start. Women and girls have been pushed out of school, work, and public life. They have been made dependent, restricted, and vulnerable by design. This sermon matters because it states the regime’s purpose with unusual bluntness. The goal is not public morality. The goal is female submission.

And this is where religion is being degraded along with women.

Islam is being used here not as a path to righteousness, but as a warrant for male control. Scripture and clerical authority are being conscripted to make domination sound sacred. That is one of the oldest abuses of religion: to take what should humble the strong and turn it into a weapon against the weak.

No serious moral society should accept that disguise. A woman is not a source of pollution to be hidden, escorted, monitored, and diminished. She is not male property. She is not a household object under external management. She is a human being. Any system that denies that is evil, whatever language it wraps around itself.

There is something especially repellent in the pettiness of it. Afghanistan has been battered by poverty, war, loss, and instability. Women there have already lost freedom, education, work, and legal protection. Faced with all that suffering, this cleric’s great moral concern is whether a woman may use both eyes.

That is not spiritual seriousness. It is sadism dressed as virtue.

When religion rots into ideology, this is what happens. The faith is no longer used to discipline pride or protect the vulnerable. It is used to flatter male authority and train women into fear. It becomes less a way to honor God than a system for breaking human beings into obedience.

A healthy religion reminds men that they are not God. The Taliban uses religion to tell them they may act like gods over women.

	Ginny on The Morning Canada Woke U…
	The Arbourist on We’ve Been Living the Asch Exp…
	tildeb on We’ve Been Living the Asch Exp…
	The Arbourist on The NDP Has Chosen a Movement,…
	The Arbourist on Negative Idealism and the Poli…

Dead Wild Roses

The DWR Friday Baroque Interlude – Bach – Sanfte soll mein Todeskummer from Easter Oratorio BWV 249 | Netherlands Bach Society

The Morning Canada Woke Up

“They were replaced by the revolutionary practice of getting on with things.”

The Questions Canadian Media Refuse to Ask

“When violence intersects with a protected identity category, Canadian media suddenly lose their appetite for explanation.”

The Lies of Transgender Activists: They Sell You 1966 to Stop 2028

“A category that cannot be enforced is not protected. It is ornamental.”

The NDP Has Chosen a Movement, Not a Base: The Radical Choice Avi Lewis

“Jack Layton’s NDP tried to defend workers inside the economy Canada actually had. Avi Lewis’s NDP looks far more interested in remaking Canada around activist priorities, even if that means sacrificing the workers and regions that built the party’s old base.”

The DWR Sunday Religious Disservice: Taliban Theology of Erasure

This Blog best viewed with Ad-Block and Firefox!

Like Privacy?

Need more DWR goodness?

See what is in bloom at DWR.

The best of the bouquet.

Your opinions…

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation

Categories

Archives

Blogs I Follow

The DWR Community

Blog Stats

The DWR RSS feed.

Get DWR on tap!

The DWR Commentariat

Dead Wild Roses

Share this:

“He knew better. He gave the group answer anyway.”

Share this:

“They were replaced by the revolutionary practice of getting on with things.”

Share this:

“When violence intersects with a protected identity category, Canadian media suddenly lose their appetite for explanation.”

Share this:

“A category that cannot be enforced is not protected. It is ornamental.”

Share this:

“Jack Layton’s NDP tried to defend workers inside the economy Canada actually had. Avi Lewis’s NDP looks far more interested in remaking Canada around activist priorities, even if that means sacrificing the workers and regions that built the party’s old base.”

Share this:

Share this:

This Blog best viewed with Ad-Block and Firefox!

Like Privacy?

Need more DWR goodness?

See what is in bloom at DWR.

TAG CLOUD:What is growing at DWR

The best of the bouquet.

Your opinions…

Categories

Archives

Blogs I Follow

The DWR Community

Blog Stats

The DWR RSS feed.

Get DWR on tap!

The DWR Commentariat