Traversable Wormholes: Fiat Avis Vola | Matryoshka Inductance Via Infinite Resonant-Lining Of Athena's Minerva
Let us now superpose two concepts into one - but still 'separate' them accordingly...
Strategic
Coordination of
Analytically-based
Long-Term
Angular thought &
Redirection
S.C.A.L.A.R
This is going to be a very implicit piece, yet also an explicit one. Why? Simply because, by the inherent definition of implicitly deconstructing, interpreting, re-interpreting and absorbing; this article will speak to a multitude of explicit phenomenology in which holds strong scientific-grounds due to the implicitness of such explicitness - and don’t worry, I won’t waste your time on all of the nitty-gritty granularities of the science aspect aha, but I will provide scientific insight for the sake of visualization and interpretation.
Let us begin. Let’s first define what “Fiat Avis Vola” even means. In latin, it translates to “let the bird fly”. However, before the bird flies, it must not just learn how to fly, but how to enact and stabilize a set of foundational, as well as proportional, elements of itself before even taking up the task of “flight” - let alone the thought of it. What does the aforementioned entail?
The aforementioned then brings us to “Matryoshka Inductance”. Matryoshka, obviously referring to a what we know to be Russian dolls of sorts. However, let us note something as it pertains to the Matryoshka dolls, such as depicted in the image below:
The dolls are of different size, dimensions, and height. However, each doll can “function” outside of its respective line-up/position relative to the rest of the dolls. Yet they can also function within a fractal, integralized state of the other dolls when proportionally desegregated, and put “back in line” in relation to one another - potentially even serving a different purpose entirely, relative to the rest of its aggregates. This visual concept has, in my humble view, the capability to metaphorically speak to what has been coined, “non-linear consciousness”; specifically pertaining to resonant oscillations within the proposed non-linear element of such.
We now must focus on the oscillatory element of the priori-mentioned. Oscillation, the word itself, has been conjectured to be defined over the decades as “movement back and forth at a regular speed” - according to the Oxford Dictionary. If we, for a moment, visualize the entire set of Matryoshka dolls “swinging” back and forth, with the smallest doll (in the image directly-above) being both the “starting”, and the “binding” force in which allows the rest to move in constant motion, velocity, acceleration, and even emit the same frequency emissions/propagations in both proportionality, scalability, and even growth relative to its predecessor respectively, we then must ask ourselves; “how can the smallest doll have such immense capacity to induce - let alone hold- enough energy to then swing the rest of the dolls with it - assuming there was some tethering of sorts that enabled connectivity of all the dolls in the first place - how could this be?”
This is where we merge the Owl of Athena with the Matryoshka dolls; and where things really go “full-swing”; no pun intended aha…
The Owl of Athena, as defined by Wikipedia, … “has been used as a symbol for knowledge, wisdom, perspicacity and erudition throughout the Western World.” We, for the sake of the scope of this article, will be focusing solely on perspicacity, and what such entails relative to the objective of this writing. Perspicacity alludes to the concept of ideologically having a readily insight into things; be-it events, conversations, strategical movements (whether politically, on a chess-board, or otherwise). Now, for one to have insight, one must be able to perceive. To perceive, one must project in a plethora of mechanisms relative to both the physical (tangible), and non-physical (non-material) apparatus’ of human thought, experience, perception, interactivity and much, much more. To perceive, one, to some extent, must induce a state (of which needn’t be specific as to the methodologies one uses to attain such a state) of observable projection, and for such to be incurred, one must enable a so-called “forecast” of said-projection, whether consciously aware of this or otherwise.
Let us now ask ourselves: Dave, this is a great Gedankenexperiment (German for “thought-experiment”), but how could this be applied practically in any way? Well first off, I will tell you that just by reading this article you are already inducing such a state. Moreover, by reading something in which details a depiction of what your mind already does (to a large degree; again whether known consciously or otherwise), you are superposing this same concept atop the initial “state” of the concept before you even read this sentence! Such goes on, and on, and on…
However, what have you done? You have, in essence, created a superposed, mentally-induced, explicit and implicit, fractal and scaled, projected and forecasted, state of trajectory; ergo, “energy strings” in which YOU can “ride” the outer-lining of, much like a surfer: the surfer does not ride the inside of the waves, no, the surfer rides the outer “lining” of said water-wave! In essence, you are imprinting a resonance of your own as you ride the specific wave in which YOU have set out to pursue. To follow with the example of the surfer for the sake of mental linearity, the surfing board itself, in which the surfer (obviously) is situated upon, is imprinting a resonance unto the water wave. There is NO incorrect nor correct “wave” relative to the pursuit of this topic - at least not to the extent in which I (Dave) have yet to discern/ascertain - albeit I will revisit this topic if later-date findings breed inconsistency to the above conceptual postulations.
Let us now apply all of the above to the image directly below:
Look closely at how such conceptual “trajectories” can not only be applied in thought, but also in practicality as we see from a decade-old paper proposing utilizing the propagation of birds in nature to act as a foundational “springboard” (again, no pun-intended) for artificially-created robotic birds (the moral and ethical discussions pertaining to such robotic and nano-robotic innovations are beyond the scope of this particular article).
The birds are only doing what your thoughts have already been doing infinitesimally since incarnation - and no, I am not speaking about physical birth when use that term; think bigger!
The question then becomes; if birds can harness this capabilization, then why can’t we? Why shouldn’t we? Could this same apparatus of “thought-construction” be applied to that of one wanting to achiever their goals in life? Absolutely.
However, just like the dolls, and just like the birds prior to take-off, there must be a focused, designated plan of what one wants to proceed with prior to takeoff. I cannot stress this enough, respectfully.
The question then becomes: is the bird ready to fly now? Is this how ‘Traversable Wormholes’ operate? Fiat Avis Vola?…
PS, as for those interested in the far-more intricate details of what has been attempted to be depicted throughout, please see Hochberg and Visser pertaining to the “throat of the wormhole” being all that is ‘needed’ to then understand, scale, and extract the necessary data of what has been called “Traversable Wormholes” to then be more thoroughly understood and (perhaps) applied practically in both Quantum and Astro-Physics experiments…
- Dave :)





