{"id":169313,"date":"2026-06-20T23:52:17","date_gmt":"2026-06-20T20:52:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/?p=169313"},"modified":"2026-06-20T23:52:17","modified_gmt":"2026-06-20T20:52:17","slug":"cisco-wireless-architectures-ap-modes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/cisco-wireless-architectures-ap-modes\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco Wireless Architectures and AP Modes Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Wireless design comes down to one question: who controls the access points? The answer splits Cisco wireless into a few distinct architectures, and it decides how you configure, scale, and troubleshoot the whole network. An AP that runs itself is a different animal from one that takes orders from a controller, and the gap between them is the heart of this objective.<\/p>\n\n<p>This covers the Cisco wireless architectures (autonomous, centralized, cloud, and FlexConnect), the split-MAC model and CAPWAP that make a controller work, what the WLC does for you, and the lightweight AP modes. It assumes you already know the RF side. If channels, SSIDs, and WPA are still fuzzy, read the <a href=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wireless-networking-fundamentals\/\">wireless networking fundamentals<\/a> first. The architectures and AP modes here match Cisco&#8217;s current WLC and IOS-XE wireless deployment models, reviewed in June 2026.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Autonomous APs: every access point on its own<\/h2>\n\n<p>An autonomous AP is self-contained. It holds its own configuration, makes its own decisions, and connects straight into the switched network. Because it serves its SSIDs and maps them to VLANs by itself, its switchport is usually a <a href=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/cisco-trunking-802-1q-configuration\/\">trunk<\/a>, carrying every VLAN the AP advertises.<\/p>\n\n<p>That independence is also the problem. There is no controller, so you configure each AP by hand, one at a time. Nothing coordinates RF across them, so two neighbors can fight over the same channel, and roaming between them is clumsy. For three APs in a small office it is fine. For three hundred across a campus it does not work, which is why enterprise wireless moved to a controller.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Centralized control with a WLC<\/h2>\n\n<p>The centralized model pairs lightweight APs with a Wireless LAN Controller (WLC). The two share the work through what Cisco calls split-MAC: the 802.11 MAC functions are divided between the AP and the controller. The AP keeps the real-time, time-sensitive jobs; the WLC takes the management jobs.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>The AP handles (real-time)<\/th><th>The WLC handles (management)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody>\n<tr><td>Beacons and probe responses<\/td><td>Client association and reassociation<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Packet acknowledgements<\/td><td>Authentication<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Frame encryption and decryption<\/td><td>RF management (channel and power, RRM)<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>MAC-layer data queuing and transmit<\/td><td>Roaming, security, and QoS policy<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>The AP reaches the controller through CAPWAP (Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points), which builds two tunnels: control on UDP 5246, encrypted with DTLS, and data on UDP 5247 (data-plane encryption is optional and off by default). CAPWAP runs over IP, so the AP and the WLC can sit in different subnets and the tunnel crosses Layer 3 between them. It replaced the older LWAPP.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1380\" height=\"640\" src=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-centralized-split-mac-capwap.png\" alt=\"Lightweight Cisco APs tunneling to a wireless LAN controller over CAPWAP in a centralized split-MAC architecture\" class=\"wp-image-169310\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-centralized-split-mac-capwap.png 1380w, https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-centralized-split-mac-capwap-300x139.png 300w, https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-centralized-split-mac-capwap-1024x475.png 1024w, https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-centralized-split-mac-capwap-768x356.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1380px) 100vw, 1380px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>In local mode, every client frame is tunneled inside CAPWAP back to the WLC, so the AP&#8217;s own switchport only carries the AP management VLAN and is typically an access port. The wired complexity moves to one place: the controller.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Cloud-managed and FlexConnect<\/h2>\n\n<p>Two variations bend the centralized model for different needs. A cloud-managed deployment (Meraki is the common example) moves the management plane to a cloud dashboard instead of an on-premises controller. You administer the APs from the cloud; the client data plane still stays local on the LAN.<\/p>\n\n<p>FlexConnect solves the branch problem. Lightweight APs at a remote site are still managed by a WLC at headquarters over the WAN, but client traffic is switched locally at the branch rather than dragged all the way back through the tunnel. The payoff shows up when the WAN link dies: local clients keep working because their data never depended on reaching the controller.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1480\" height=\"600\" src=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-flexconnect-architecture.png\" alt=\"FlexConnect branch APs switching client data locally with only CAPWAP control crossing the WAN to the WLC at HQ\" class=\"wp-image-169311\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-flexconnect-architecture.png 1480w, https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-flexconnect-architecture-300x122.png 300w, https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-flexconnect-architecture-1024x415.png 1024w, https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cisco-wireless-flexconnect-architecture-768x311.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1480px) 100vw, 1480px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>The four architectures line up like this:<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Architecture<\/th><th>Controller<\/th><th>Config lives<\/th><th>Client data path<\/th><th>Best for<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody>\n<tr><td>Autonomous<\/td><td>None<\/td><td>On each AP<\/td><td>Straight to the local switch<\/td><td>A handful of APs<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Centralized<\/td><td>On-prem WLC<\/td><td>On the WLC<\/td><td>Tunneled to the WLC (local mode)<\/td><td>Campus and enterprise<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Cloud<\/td><td>Cloud dashboard<\/td><td>In the cloud<\/td><td>Local<\/td><td>Distributed sites, no on-prem box<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>FlexConnect<\/td><td>WLC at HQ<\/td><td>On the WLC<\/td><td>Switched locally at the branch<\/td><td>Branches over a WAN<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>What the WLC centralizes<\/h2>\n\n<p>The reason the controller model scales is that it does the per-AP work once, centrally, for every AP joined to it. Push a configuration or a security policy and it lands on all of them. Radio Resource Management (RRM) tunes channel and power across the whole site so APs stop interfering with each other. Roaming is coordinated, so a client walking down a hallway hands off cleanly. The controller also pushes AP images, handles guest access, and watches for rogue APs. A device type many people meet for the first time here, the WLC sits alongside the router, switch, and firewall in the <a href=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/network-devices-routers-switches-firewalls-explained\/\">network device lineup<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Lightweight AP modes<\/h2>\n\n<p>A lightweight AP joined to a WLC runs in one mode at a time. Most APs sit in local mode serving clients, but several other modes turn an AP into a dedicated tool.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>AP mode<\/th><th>What it does<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody>\n<tr><td>Local<\/td><td>Default. Serves clients, and goes off-channel periodically to scan.<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>FlexConnect<\/td><td>Branch AP that switches client data locally and survives WAN loss.<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Monitor<\/td><td>Serves no clients. Dedicated scanning for rogues, IDS\/IPS, and location.<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Sniffer<\/td><td>Captures 802.11 frames and forwards them to a packet analyzer.<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Rogue Detector<\/td><td>Watches the wired side (ARP) for rogue MAC addresses. Uses no radio. Legacy: Wave 1 APs only, dropped on Catalyst 9800.<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>SE-Connect<\/td><td>Dedicated RF spectrum analysis (Spectrum Expert).<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Bridge \/ Mesh<\/td><td>Acts as a wireless bridge (point-to-point or multipoint) or a mesh node.<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>How the APs and WLC connect<\/h2>\n\n<p>The physical wiring follows the architecture. An autonomous AP needs a trunk port because it carries several VLANs itself. A local-mode lightweight AP usually sits on an access port, since its client traffic is tunneled to the controller and the wire only needs the AP management VLAN. The WLC connects to the wired network through a link aggregation group (LAG), bundling several ports into one logical trunk for bandwidth and resilience. This is the wireless half of the wider <a href=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/network-architectures-explained\/\">network architecture<\/a> picture.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Practice Cisco wireless architectures<\/h2>\n\n<p>This is a describe objective with no device configuration, so there is no downloadable lab for it. Test the architectures, CAPWAP ports, and AP modes with the quiz instead:<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"cfg-quiz\" data-quiz=\"{\n  &quot;id&quot;: &quot;wireless-architectures&quot;,\n  &quot;title&quot;: &quot;Cisco wireless architectures and AP modes quiz&quot;,\n  &quot;objective&quot;: &quot;2.6 Describe Cisco wireless architectures and AP modes&quot;,\n  &quot;intro&quot;: &quot;Ten questions on how Cisco wireless is deployed: autonomous vs controller-based, split-MAC and CAPWAP, FlexConnect, what the WLC centralizes, and the lightweight AP modes. Every answer is checked against current Cisco documentation.&quot;,\n  &quot;questions&quot;: [\n    {&quot;q&quot;: &quot;In a split-MAC architecture, which functions does the WLC handle?&quot;, &quot;options&quot;: [&quot;Real-time functions like beacons and frame encryption&quot;, &quot;Management functions like association, authentication, RF management, and roaming&quot;, &quot;Nothing, the AP does everything&quot;, &quot;Only powering the AP&quot;], &quot;answer&quot;: 1, &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;Split-MAC divides the 802.11 MAC work: the lightweight AP keeps the real-time jobs (beacons, ACKs, encryption), and the WLC takes the management jobs (association, authentication, RF management, roaming, and policy).&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;type&quot;: &quot;numeric&quot;, &quot;q&quot;: &quot;Which UDP port does the CAPWAP control channel use? Type the number.&quot;, &quot;answer&quot;: &quot;5246&quot;, &quot;hint&quot;: &quot;Data is the next port up.&quot;, &quot;placeholder&quot;: &quot;e.g. 5247&quot;, &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;CAPWAP control uses UDP 5246 (encrypted with DTLS). The data channel uses UDP 5247. CAPWAP runs over IP, so the AP and WLC can be in different subnets.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;type&quot;: &quot;numeric&quot;, &quot;q&quot;: &quot;Which UDP port does the CAPWAP data channel use? Type the number.&quot;, &quot;answer&quot;: &quot;5247&quot;, &quot;hint&quot;: &quot;One above the control port.&quot;, &quot;placeholder&quot;: &quot;e.g. 5246&quot;, &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;CAPWAP data uses UDP 5247 (data encryption optional); control uses UDP 5246. Together they tunnel a lightweight AP&#039;s traffic to the WLC.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;q&quot;: &quot;What is the main drawback of an autonomous AP deployment?&quot;, &quot;options&quot;: [&quot;It cannot use encryption&quot;, &quot;Each AP is configured and managed individually, with no central RF or roaming coordination&quot;, &quot;It needs a WLC&quot;, &quot;It only supports one client&quot;], &quot;answer&quot;: 1, &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;Autonomous APs are self-contained, so every AP is configured one at a time and there is no central controller to coordinate RF, roaming, or policy. That is fine for a few APs and painful at scale.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;q&quot;: &quot;What is the defining benefit of FlexConnect?&quot;, &quot;options&quot;: [&quot;It removes the need for any WLC&quot;, &quot;Branch APs switch client data locally and keep working if the WAN to the WLC drops&quot;, &quot;It doubles wireless speed&quot;, &quot;It encrypts the WAN&quot;], &quot;answer&quot;: 1, &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;FlexConnect lets branch APs (managed by a WLC at HQ) switch client traffic locally instead of tunneling it back. If the WAN link to the controller fails, local clients keep working.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;q&quot;: &quot;Which protocol tunnels traffic between a lightweight AP and the WLC?&quot;, &quot;options&quot;: [&quot;CDP&quot;, &quot;CAPWAP&quot;, &quot;LACP&quot;, &quot;STP&quot;], &quot;answer&quot;: 1, &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;CAPWAP (Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points) builds the control (UDP 5246) and data (UDP 5247) tunnels between a lightweight AP and the WLC. It replaced the older LWAPP.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;q&quot;: &quot;In a cloud-based architecture (such as Meraki), where does management live?&quot;, &quot;options&quot;: [&quot;On an on-premises WLC&quot;, &quot;In a cloud dashboard, while the data plane stays local&quot;, &quot;On each AP individually&quot;, &quot;In the cloud, including all client data&quot;], &quot;answer&quot;: 1, &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;Cloud-managed APs are administered from a cloud dashboard (the management\/control plane), but client data is still switched locally. There is no on-premises controller appliance.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;type&quot;: &quot;multi&quot;, &quot;q&quot;: &quot;Which two of these are real lightweight AP modes?&quot;, &quot;options&quot;: [&quot;Monitor&quot;, &quot;Sniffer&quot;, &quot;Trunk&quot;, &quot;Broadcast&quot;], &quot;answers&quot;: [0, 1], &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;Monitor mode dedicates the AP to scanning (no clients), and Sniffer mode captures 802.11 frames to a packet analyzer. Trunk and Broadcast are not AP modes.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;type&quot;: &quot;match&quot;, &quot;q&quot;: &quot;Match each AP mode to what it does.&quot;, &quot;pairs&quot;: [{&quot;left&quot;: &quot;Local&quot;, &quot;right&quot;: &quot;Serves clients normally (default mode)&quot;}, {&quot;left&quot;: &quot;Monitor&quot;, &quot;right&quot;: &quot;Scans only, serves no clients (rogue\/IDS)&quot;}, {&quot;left&quot;: &quot;Sniffer&quot;, &quot;right&quot;: &quot;Captures 802.11 frames to a packet analyzer&quot;}, {&quot;left&quot;: &quot;FlexConnect&quot;, &quot;right&quot;: &quot;Branch AP with local switching&quot;}], &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;Local is the default client-serving mode, Monitor is dedicated scanning, Sniffer feeds a protocol analyzer, and FlexConnect switches branch traffic locally.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;},\n    {&quot;q&quot;: &quot;Why does a controller-based design scale better than autonomous APs?&quot;, &quot;options&quot;: [&quot;The WLC manages config, RF, roaming, and policy centrally for all APs&quot;, &quot;Lightweight APs are faster radios&quot;, &quot;It uses fewer VLANs&quot;, &quot;CAPWAP compresses traffic&quot;], &quot;answer&quot;: 0, &quot;explanation&quot;: &quot;With a WLC you push one config, RF plan (RRM), and security policy to every AP from one place, and roaming is coordinated centrally. Autonomous APs would each need that done by hand.&quot;, &quot;validated&quot;: &quot;doc&quot;}\n  ]\n}\n\"><div class=\"cfg-quiz-loading\">Loading quiz...<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<p>Then drill the split-MAC split, the deployment models, and the AP modes with the flashcards, or load the deck into Anki:<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"cfg-fc\" data-fc=\"{\n  &quot;id&quot;: &quot;wireless-architectures&quot;,\n  &quot;title&quot;: &quot;Cisco Wireless Architectures and AP Modes Flashcards&quot;,\n  &quot;objective&quot;: &quot;2.6 Describe Cisco wireless architectures and AP modes&quot;,\n  &quot;intro&quot;: &quot;The wireless-deployment facts worth knowing cold: autonomous vs controller-based, split-MAC and CAPWAP, cloud and FlexConnect, what the WLC centralizes, and the lightweight AP modes. Tap a card to flip it, then mark whether you knew it.&quot;,\n  &quot;cards&quot;: [\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;Autonomous AP architecture&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;Each AP is self-contained: it holds its own config and connects straight to the switched network (a trunk port when it serves several SSIDs\/VLANs). No controller, so every AP is managed individually and there is no central RF or roaming. Fine for a few APs, painful at scale.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;Centralized (controller-based) architecture&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;Lightweight APs plus a Wireless LAN Controller (WLC). The APs tunnel to the WLC over CAPWAP; the WLC centralizes config, RF, roaming, and policy. The dominant enterprise model.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;What is split-MAC?&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;The 802.11 MAC work is split between the lightweight AP and the WLC. The AP keeps real-time jobs; the WLC takes management jobs.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;Split-MAC: what the AP does&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;Real-time, time-sensitive functions: beacons and probe responses, packet acknowledgements, frame encryption\/decryption, and MAC-layer data queuing and transmit.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;Split-MAC: what the WLC does&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;Management functions: client association\/reassociation and roaming, authentication, RF management (RRM: channel and power), security and QoS policy, and AP image\/config push.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;What is CAPWAP?&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points: the tunneling protocol between a lightweight AP and the WLC. It replaced the older LWAPP and runs over IP, so the AP and WLC can be in different subnets.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;CAPWAP ports&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;Control = UDP 5246 (encrypted with DTLS). Data = UDP 5247 (data encryption optional).&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;Cloud-based architecture (e.g. Meraki)&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;APs are managed from a cloud dashboard. The management\/control plane lives in the cloud; the client data plane stays local. No on-premises controller appliance.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;FlexConnect&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;A branch deployment mode: lightweight APs at a remote site are managed by a WLC at HQ over the WAN, but client data is switched LOCALLY. Clients keep working even if the WAN to the WLC drops.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;What does the WLC centralize?&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;One config and security\/QoS policy for all APs, dynamic RF management (RRM: channel and power), seamless roaming, guest access, AP image\/config push, and rogue detection.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;AP mode: Local&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;The default mode. The AP serves clients normally and periodically goes off-channel to scan.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;AP mode: Monitor&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;The AP serves no clients and is dedicated to scanning: rogue detection, IDS\/IPS, and location services.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;AP mode: Sniffer&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;The AP captures 802.11 frames and forwards them to a packet analyzer (Wireshark, OmniPeek) for troubleshooting.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;AP modes: Rogue Detector and SE-Connect&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;Rogue Detector watches the WIRED side (ARP) for rogue MACs and uses no radio. SE-Connect (Spectrum Expert) does dedicated RF spectrum analysis.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;AP mode: Bridge \/ Mesh&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;The AP acts as a wireless bridge (point-to-point or point-to-multipoint) or a mesh node. Flex+Bridge combines FlexConnect with mesh.&quot;},\n    {&quot;front&quot;: &quot;Autonomous AP switchport vs lightweight (local) AP switchport&quot;, &quot;back&quot;: &quot;An autonomous AP needs a TRUNK port to carry multiple SSID-to-VLAN mappings. A local-mode lightweight AP usually sits on an ACCESS port, because client traffic is tunneled to the WLC inside CAPWAP.&quot;}\n  ]\n}\n\" data-fc-anki=\"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ccna-wireless-architectures-flashcards.apkg\"><div class=\"cfg-fc-loading\">Loading flashcards...<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<h2>Which architecture fits<\/h2>\n\n<p>The choice is mostly about scale and where the sites are. A few APs in one office can stay autonomous; the controller overhead is not worth it. A campus or any building with dozens of APs wants a centralized WLC, for the central config, RF management, and clean roaming that autonomous APs cannot give you. Sites scattered across many locations with no appetite for an on-prem controller fit the cloud model. And branches hanging off a WAN want FlexConnect, so a dropped link to headquarters does not take the local wireless down with it. Pick the architecture first, because it dictates how every AP after it is deployed and managed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Understand Cisco wireless architectures and AP modes: autonomous vs controller-based, split-MAC and CAPWAP, FlexConnect, and the lightweight AP modes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":169312,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[524,525],"cfg_series":[39888],"class_list":["post-169313","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-networking","tag-ccna","tag-cisco","cfg_series-ccna-200-301"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169313"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169313\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":169314,"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169313\/revisions\/169314"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/169312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169313"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169313"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169313"},{"taxonomy":"cfg_series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/computingforgeeks.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cfg_series?post=169313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}