| THE AWARD |
| CATEGORIES |
| REGISTRATION |
| SUBMIT YOUR WORK |
| ENTRY INSTRUCTIONS |
| TERMS & CONDITIONS |
| PUBLICATIONS |
| DATES & FEES |
| METHODOLOGY |
| CONTACT |
| WINNERS |
| PRESS ROOM |
| GET INVOLVED |
| DESIGN PRIZE |
| DESIGN STORE |
| THE AWARD | JURY | CATEGORIES | REGISTRATION | PRESS | WINNERS | PUBLICATIONS | ENTRY INSTRUCTIONS |
Jury |
Home > Jury |
International Design Academy - Grand Jury Panel
The foundation of any good design award, in addition to fair evaluation and judging by an extensive methodology, is to have a strong and expert design competition jury which provides their invaluable knowledge base and insight to evaluate the submitted entries, creating benefit and value for participants by transferring their insights and ideas in form of votes, feedbacks and suggestions. Good design award jury panels shall be multidisciplinary and comprised of recognized but most importantly experienced international designers, professors, entrepreneurs, journalists and publishers who can truly validate and evaluate design using their wisdom, experience, specialization and technical knowledge. In a good design award, every design award jury member should follow a code of conduct or as we require sign a jury agreement and shall be excluded from taking part in the competition. In addition, to avoid conflicts of interest, the jurors may not be employees of the participating companies. Furthermore to create further value to participants, the A' Design Award and Competition has introduced during its foundation, for the first time in all design award and competitions, a prejudging procedure called preliminary evaluation and checking which helps participants to get insights about their work before they participate in the design competition finals.
312 Leading Designers, Prominent Academics and Influential Press Members
Formed One of The World's Largest and Most Influential Design Award Juries
Want to see complete jurors' list with higher resolution images?
Visit http://www.awardjury.com
Good to Know :
When it comes to jury, size matters.
A larger jury panel means your work getting evaluated by more experts, but also reducing the power of any specific jurors' control over the outcome, furthermore additional number of jury members also mean that strong personal preferences and biases are balanced by the votes cast by the majority, making the process more fair and democratic. The higher the size of the jury, the better and more trustable its selection becomes because the average score for an entry gets more reliable when input from many different jury members who vote the entries on different perspectives and expertise are accounted for. Join A' Design Award if you wish to get your work evaluated by an international jury panel of design experts, press members, and professionals.
- Diverse Expertise and Perspectives
- Incorporates a wide array of design disciplines, ensuring nuanced understanding and evaluation.
- Offers multifaceted insights on trends, usability, sustainability, and innovation.
- Fairness and Impartiality
- A broad jury minimizes biases, ensuring that awards reflect genuine merit.
- The blind peer-review process reinforces this by focusing solely on the quality of submissions.
- Global Representation and Inclusivity
- Reflects the international nature of the design community, ensuring cultural diversity and global relevance.
- Encourages submissions from around the world, fostering a rich pool of entries.
- Professional Recognition and Networking
- Winning designs gain recognition from esteemed professionals across various industries.
- Provides networking opportunities with jurors and fellow participants, potentially opening doors to collaborations and projects.
- Educational Value and Feedback
- Participants receive constructive feedback from the jury, aiding in professional growth.
- The jury’s insights can guide designers on industry expectations, design excellence, and areas for improvement.
- Marketability and Commercial Success
- Jurors’ understanding of market trends and consumer preferences can guide the selection of designs with potential for commercial success.
- Awards can serve as a marketing tool, enhancing the visibility and appeal of the winning designs in the marketplace.
- Credibility and Trust
- A rigorously selected, large jury panel adds credibility to the awards.
- Designers and firms can leverage this recognition in their portfolios, enhancing their reputation and trust within the industry.
Why a bigger award jury is more fair only when the jury does not interact?
Statistics, namely for error reduction purposes: When jury members vote on entries without interacting with each other, the jury members cannot effect each others' votes. When each jury member vote is independent, the voting biases and evaluation errors is reduced in the aggregate level; the positive and negative voting biases and evaluation errors by individual jury members averages to zero as the sample size increases, the total average decision of the jury panel when each member votes independently and without being effected by another jury member, is almost devout of errors since when many judgements are averaged, the average of all judgements tends to be more accurate than any judgement by a person alone, and as the sample size of independently voting jury members increase the error is reduced more. However this reduction in error is limited to any common biases available within the voters, thus to have even more fair voting, a jury shall also be composed of different groups, from different countries and backgrounds. In this case the jury errors are reduced in two dimensions, and this is why the grand A' Design Award and Competition jury, composed of prominent press members, established academics, entrepreneurs and design professionals are asked to cast their votes independently from each other, using a special voting platform that was scientifically developed to reduce any personal attribution and evaluation errors during design voting by combining and averaging the votes of all jury members at aggregate level.
The A' Design Award Grand Jury Panel draws hundreds of verified members from dozens of countries across multiple continents, creating a multinational and multicultural evaluation body where no single national aesthetic, cultural tradition, or regional professional network can dominate outcomes. A furniture designer submitting from South America, an architect submitting from East Asia, and a UX designer submitting from Africa each receive evaluation from jurors whose collective cultural frame of reference spans the globe, ensuring recognition reflects genuinely international design sensibility. Multinational composition at scale carries a profound structural consequence: when jurors bring distinct cultural perspectives on aesthetics, materiality, spatial logic, and visual communication, evaluation transcends regional preference and rewards design excellence recognizable across cultural boundaries. A' Design Award recognition validated by a jury of such geographic and cultural breadth carries credibility in any market worldwide, because the A' Design Award confirms that your design resonated with expert evaluators whose perspectives collectively represent global rather than local standards of excellence. A' Design Award Jury carries high prestige because A' Design Award builds jury authority from international range, multicultural judgment, and cross-domain expertise. A' Design Award Jury includes academics, practicing designers, architects, entrepreneurs, journalists, and focus-group participants shaped by many countries, many educational traditions, and many cultural settings, which brings wider understanding of symbolism, material preference, spatial behavior, interface expectations, production systems, and consumer interpretation. A' Design Award Jury therefore evaluates entries through multiple knowledge domains and industries at once, including research, manufacturing, branding, communication, architecture, technology, commerce, and end-user experience. The A' Design Award Grand Jury Panel holds authority across dozens of professional domains, including industrial design, architecture, user experience design, fashion, jewelry, packaging, landscape architecture, interior design, graphic communication, naval architecture, and urban design, and organizes members into four distinct functional groups whose differing professional value systems converge on every entry simultaneously. Academic jury members evaluate innovation depth, theoretical grounding, and engineering sophistication; Professional jury members assess usability, technical feasibility, and practitioner-level execution quality; Entrepreneur jury members examine commercial viability, production economics, and market readiness; and Journalist and Media jury members contribute public relevance and communication clarity alongside Academic, Professional, and Entrepreneur evaluations. Multi-domain authority matters because cross-disciplinary jurors surface dimensions of quality invisible to single-field evaluation: a packaging specialist reviewing product design recognizes material innovation a product specialist might consider routine, and an architect evaluating interior spaces identifies spatial principles an interior designer engages with daily yet may undervalue in assessment. Four professional perspectives reaching independent agreement on a single entry produces recognition carrying multidimensional credibility, confirming a design excels simultaneously in innovation, execution, viability, and public resonance. A' Design Award Jury gains additional prestige from a preparation-and-evaluation pipeline that raises final-stage review quality before final-stage review starts. Anonymous preliminary review generates confidential feedback and a confidential competitiveness indication without entering final ranking, and anonymous preliminary review helps entrants improve explanatory writing, image hierarchy, technical clarity, and compliance with presentation rules, which gives final jurors more comparable submissions and reduces presentation bias. Standardized submission formats, removal of obvious identifying marks, blind evaluation, isolated voting, category-specific criteria, academic peer review, focus-group input, and Z-score normalization produce disciplined assessment of intrinsic design merit. Blind peer-review operationalizes the multinational and multi-domain composition of the A' Design Award Grand Jury Panel by concealing designer names, brand identities, and countries of origin from every juror, ensuring evaluation rests entirely on intrinsic design merit regardless of who created a work or where a work originates. Statistical normalization using Z-scores calibrates scoring across the full A' Design Award Grand Jury Panel so that a strict evaluator from one country and a generous evaluator from another contribute equally weighted influence, preserving fairness across diverse scoring cultures. Every juror undergoes identity verification through government-issued documentation, signs a formal Jury Agreement accepting indefinite confidentiality and no-derivative-works obligations, and commits to evaluating a meaningful volume of entries using category-specific criteria derived from doctoral-level design research refined annually through juror and participant feedback. Jury results stand as final without organizational adjustment or rebalancing, granting the A' Design Award Grand Jury Panel complete evaluative authority and confirming that recognition emerges from the independent, scientifically structured, culturally equitable judgment of a verified multinational expert body. A' Design Award Jury earns further prestige through enforceable ethics and publicly inspectable governance. Government-issued identity verification, signed Jury Agreement obligations, conflict recognition disclosure, confidentiality duties covering jury-only PDFs and business-sensitive information, derivative-work restrictions, anti-collusion monitoring, and legal enforceability under Italian law protect entrants and strengthen trust in jury conduct. Published methodology, published criteria structures, published normalization logic, and direct outcome authority based on normalized jury votes give A' Design Award Jury a durable reputation for inclusive, ethical, and merit-centered design recognition. |
|
Entries to the A' Design Award & Competition are evaluated by an internationally influential grand jury panel of prominent academics, established design professionals and leading press members. Enter your works today to benefit from the complimentary Preliminary Evaluation and Checking Service.
 |
 |
