[v13.0/forgejo] fix: release email links #9714

Merged
mfenniak merged 1 commit from bp-v13.0/forgejo-5b13c6e into v13.0/forgejo 2025-10-16 18:58:56 +02:00

Backport: #9690

Use correct links (instance.com/owner/repo/archive/tag.extension) links in release emails, instead of the (/owner/repo) incomplete links.

I have manually tested this. Below is a screenshot of an email sent with the new version having correct hyperlinks.

Fixes #9482

Checklist

The contributor guide contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories. You are also welcome to join the Forgejo development chatroom.

Tests

  • I added test coverage for Go changes...
    • in their respective *_test.go for unit tests.
    • in the tests/integration directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
  • I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...

Manual test screenshots

image

Documentation

  • I created a pull request to the documentation to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
  • I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.

Release notes

  • I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
  • I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
  • I want the content of the release-notes/<pull request number>.md to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9690 Use correct links (instance.com/owner/repo/archive/tag.extension) links in release emails, instead of the (/owner/repo) incomplete links. I have manually tested this. Below is a screenshot of an email sent with the new version having correct hyperlinks. Fixes #9482 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). #### Manual test screenshots ![image](/attachments/f00fb1f9-17f2-4df8-bc0d-3e8f215020cb) ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
fix: release email links (#9690)
All checks were successful
requirements / merge-conditions (pull_request) Successful in 4s
issue-labels / release-notes (pull_request_target) Has been skipped
testing / frontend-checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m44s
issue-labels / cascade (pull_request_target) Has been skipped
testing / backend-checks (pull_request) Successful in 4m17s
testing / test-unit (pull_request) Successful in 7m53s
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (pull_request) Successful in 3m58s
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (pull_request) Successful in 3m50s
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (pull_request) Successful in 3m29s
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (pull_request) Successful in 3m53s
testing / test-mysql (pull_request) Successful in 24m29s
testing / test-e2e (pull_request) Successful in 27m30s
testing / test-sqlite (pull_request) Successful in 29m1s
testing / test-pgsql (pull_request) Successful in 33m56s
testing / security-check (pull_request) Successful in 2m51s
issue-labels / backporting (pull_request_target) Has been skipped
milestone / set (pull_request_target) Successful in 6s
46f1cd0257
Use correct links (instance.com/owner/repo/archive/tag.extension) links in release emails, instead of the (/owner/repo) incomplete links.

Fixes #9482

## Checklist

The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).

### Tests

- I added test coverage for Go changes...
  - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
  - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
  - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
  - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).

#### Manual test screenshots

![image](/attachments/f00fb1f9-17f2-4df8-bc0d-3e8f215020cb)

### Documentation

- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.

### Release notes

- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.

Reviewed-on: #9690
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: VewDev <vewdev@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: VewDev <vewdev@noreply.codeberg.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5b13c6e024)
mfenniak approved these changes 2025-10-16 16:20:06 +02:00
Gusted approved these changes 2025-10-16 16:51:06 +02:00
mfenniak merged commit d59c49ec52 into v13.0/forgejo 2025-10-16 18:58:56 +02:00
mfenniak deleted branch bp-v13.0/forgejo-5b13c6e 2025-10-16 18:59:01 +02:00
jasewolf referenced this pull request from a commit 2025-11-16 14:02:47 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
arch
riscv64
backport/v1.19
backport/v1.20
backport/v1.21/forgejo
backport/v10.0/forgejo
backport/v11.0/forgejo
backport/v12.0/forgejo
backport/v13.0/forgejo
backport/v14.0/forgejo
backport/v15.0/forgejo
backport/v7.0/forgejo
backport/v8.0/forgejo
backport/v9.0/forgejo
breaking
bug
bug
confirmed
bug
duplicate
bug
needs-more-info
bug
new-report
bug
reported-upstream
code/actions
code/api
code/auth
code/auth/faidp
code/auth/farp
code/email
code/federation
code/git
code/migrations
code/packages
code/wiki
database
MySQL
database
PostgreSQL
database
SQLite
dependency-upgrade
dependency
Chi
dependency
Chroma
dependency
F3
dependency
ForgeFed
dependency
garage
dependency
Gitea
dependency
Golang
Discussion
duplicate
enhancement/feature
forgejo/accessibility
forgejo/branding
forgejo/ci
forgejo/commit-graph
forgejo/documentation
forgejo/furnace cleanup
forgejo/i18n
forgejo/interop
forgejo/moderation
forgejo/privacy
forgejo/release
forgejo/scaling
forgejo/security
forgejo/ui
Gain
High
Gain
Nice to have
Gain
Undefined
Gain
Very High
good first issue
i18n/backport-stable
impact
large
impact
medium
impact
small
impact
unknown
Incompatible license
issue
closed
issue
do-not-exist-yet
issue
open
manual test
Manually tested during feature freeze
OS
FreeBSD
OS
Linux
OS
macOS
OS
Windows
problem
QA
regression
release blocker
Release Cycle
Feature Freeze
release-blocker
v7.0
release-blocker
v7.0.1
release-blocker
v7.0.2
release-blocker
v7.0.3
release-blocker
v7.0.4
release-blocker
v8.0.0
release-blocker/v9.0.0
run-all-playwright-tests
run-end-to-end-tests
stage
2-research
stage
3-design
stage
4-implementation
test
manual
test
needed
test
needs-help
test
not-needed
test
present
untested
User research - time-tracker
valuable code
worth a release-note
User research - Accessibility
User research - Blocked
User research - Community
User research - Config (instance)
User research - Errors
User research - Filters
User research - Future backlog
User research - Git workflow
User research - Labels
User research - Moderation
User research - Needs input
User research - Notifications/Dashboard
User research - Rendering
User research - Repo creation
User research - Repo units
User research - Security
User research - Settings (in-app)
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
forgejo/forgejo!9714
No description provided.