Where You Think From Determines What You Can Think
Anyone paralyzed by AI is thinking from inside it. There’s a way out, three in fact.
Prime real estate used to mean location, location, location. In 2026 it became a few inches behind your forehead, and AI moved in without paying rent.
A Substack writer stares at their subscriber count and wonders if an update in the algorithm just made their voice irrelevant. A mid-level manager refreshes their inbox waiting for a restructuring announcement. A senior executive who spent thirty years building expertise sits in a strategy meeting and realizes the room has moved on without them. A college student wonders, for the first time, whether their degree is a destination or an expensive, time-wasting detour.
The question underneath all of it - what humans are actually for when the machine no longer needs them to run it - is being asked. The harder question is why so few can hear it yet.
The details are different, but their thinking is exactly the same.
They’re all thinking from inside the threat.
The neuroscience is clear on thinking from inside a threat…you can’t think your way out of it from there. The brain doesn’t offer that option. When the amygdala registers danger - real, imagined, or economic - the prefrontal cortex goes quiet. The Premium Thinking that might actually solve the problem becomes structurally inaccessible. It’s a human thing and it’s just the way is, it’s not all about you or what’s wrong with you. The brain’s ancient alarm system was never designed for a disruption this large, this fast, or this abstract.
So here we go, the anxiety compounds. And the thinking stays stuck.
The data reflects this at scale too. Google ‘AI Anxiety’…that'll clear up your complexion. Fifty percent of US senior executives now rank AI as their top business risk, surpassing economic slowdown and supply chain disruption. Workers’ use of AI went up 13% last year while their confidence in it dropped 18% simultaneously. Executives believe their workforce is enthusiastic about AI; most employees report confusion, anxiety, and limited involvement in the decisions being made about it. Everyone performing confidence they don’t feel, from a vantage point that makes genuine confidence impossible.
Two different zip codes in the same neighborhood of stuck.
Know with all surety that the anxiety itself is information. It’s your brain saying something significant is happening and that your current vantage point can’t make sense of it yet. But be cool, be Fonzi, don’t view this as a crisis, it’s not. It’s the precise condition under which the most interesting thinking becomes possible…if you know how to relocate yourself.
This premium thinking skill is called self-distancing, which I touched on in Self-Identity On Demand. Ethan Kross at the University of Michigan has spent two decades mapping what happens when people shift from first-person immersion in a problem to a third-person observer stance. The results are consistent and striking every time: reduced emotional reactivity, interrupted rumination loops, and measurably improved decision quality. The prefrontal cortex re-engages. Analysis, evaluation, and creative synthesis - Premium Thinking - all become available again.
THREE ESCAPES become available from self-distancing. All three of the perspective shifts are real. All three work and can be great fun. And get this, everyone who has genuinely navigated disruption, not just survived it but found it interesting, used at least one of them…
RELOCATE
Step outside the situation physically, temporally, or linguistically. Watch yourself in this moment from across the room. Ask what the version of you five years from now would think about what you’re avoiding today. Invoke the name of someone who has already moved through this exact fear and found it generative…a mentor, a future self, someone in your field who navigated disruption with curiosity instead of dread. Ask what they would do, not what you should do. The name is just the door. Distance creates the capability that fear was blocking.
-Spatially: “That person in the meeting looks genuinely terrified.”-Temporally: “Future-me is laughing at what I’m avoiding.”
-Linguistically: “What would (name) do with this?”
REFRAME
Fear and curiosity occupy the same neurological neighborhood. The same stimulus routes differently depending on the frame you bring to it. The writer who steps outside the subscriber count and asks what a disrupted media landscape makes possible that didn’t exist before is operating from a fundamentally different cognitive address than the anxiety offers. The executive who steps outside the expertise and asks what thirty years of judgment looks like when it’s no longer competing with a search engine discovers something the reactive mind cannot reach. Same facts. Different frame.
-The question where’s all this going? keeps you inside the threat.
-The question what does this make possible? moves you above it.
ACT BEFORE YOU UNDERSTAND
Clarity is a luxury disruption rarely offers in advance. The people who navigated every previous wave of technological disruption (printing press, electricity, the internet) rarely understood it first. They moved and learned simultaneously. A small action taken from inside the uncertainty does more for cognitive position than any amount of additional research consumed from inside the fear. Eighty-eight percent of employees are using AI at work. Only five percent are using it in ways that transform how they work. The other 83% are consuming information about a tool from inside the anxiety about the tool, waiting for certainty that the situation has no obligation to provide.
All escapes, these perspective shifts, share a single mechanism: getting outside the first-person position. They feel different enough that every person finds their own door in, but they all open into the same room…the one where Premium Thinking becomes available again.
Visible things can be worked with.
Invisible frames just run you.
This matters for AI specifically because AI itself cannot distance itself from itself. It has no “self” to distance from. It processes from inside its training data, pattern-matching without the capacity to relocate its own perspective. The observer stance (the ability to step outside your own thinking and examine it from elsewhere) remains distinctly human.
Claude was wrong above…thinking about your thinking is called Metacognition. I corrected Claude and it tried to bullshit its way out of the volley. The venerable and vital Claude often errors and is prone to waxing as it does even in defeat…
In an environment where AI is handling enormous amounts of Commodity Thinking, the premium skill isn’t faster thinking. It’s thinking from a better position, a forward position or alternate perspective when needed.
You can also use AI itself to break this open. The trick…give it a cognitive job, not a search job.
COGNITIVE PROMPT
I’m feeling (name your specific fear about AI, be honest, not polished). Don’t give me information or reassurance. Respond as someone who has already moved through this exact fear and found it interesting. Ask me only the questions that person would ask…the ones that help me see this from where they’re standing, not where I am right now.
Which brings us back to the Substack writer, the manager, the executive, the student.
The question none of them are asking - because they’re too far inside the anxiety to ask it - is this: from what position would this be interesting instead of threatening?
The reader supplies whoever that capable person is for them. AI holds that position. The reader does the Premium Thinking. AI holds the ladder.
Here’s what I know about understanding new information, and this applies whether you’re a soloprenuer or running a division: If it isn’t engaging, it isn’t working. The anxiety response signals that your brain has registered something as a threat worth avoiding. The curiosity response signals that your brain has registered something as a puzzle worth solving. A small but attainable challenge. The difference between them is almost entirely determined by where you’re standing when you encounter the information. Boredom is a threat, too, BTW.
Self-distancing isn’t a stress management technique either. Think of it as a thinking upgrade. The moment you step outside the frame, the threat becomes a terrain. Terrains can be navigated. Better yet, they can be explored.
That’s when the fun starts. And if we’re not having fun, we’re doing something wrong - which is another way of saying we haven’t found the right vantage point yet and still another way of saying we’re not learning unless we’re in the right headspace.
The way out isn’t through the anxiety. It’s above it.
Step back. Get high above the weeds. Look at yourself in this moment. Ask what the person you’re becoming would think about the choice you’re making right now…to stay inside the fear or to move to higher ground.
From up there, the view is considerably more interesting.
Rich Carr is the author of Brain-centric Design, SURPRISED, and Invisible Influence. He teaches Premium Thinking skills to Fortune business leaders.










I love this question, "… from what position would this be interesting instead of threatening?"
If there is no disruption, there is no growth - and it's in the disruption that we once again awaken.
We forget that life is dynamic and every changing - because if it wasn't that would essentially be death.
Yes. This realisation is really Marx materialism. The conditions often sets constraints to the thinking since your brain stops you from question your own subsistence.