Synopsis
In 1919, Hungarian Communists aid the Bolsheviks' defeat of Czarists, the Whites. Near the Volga, a monastery and a field hospital are held by one side and then the other.
In 1919, Hungarian Communists aid the Bolsheviks' defeat of Czarists, the Whites. Near the Volga, a monastery and a field hospital are held by one side and then the other.
Csillagosok, katonák, Los rojos y los blancos, Rouges et Blancs, Звёзды и солдаты, 적과 백, Rød og hvit, Qırmızı və Ağ, Sterne an den Mützen, L'armata a cavallo, האדום והלבן, Vermelhos e brancos, Röda och vita, 红军与白军, Gwiazdy na czapkach, Hvězdy na čepicích, 紅軍與白軍
This film apparently took some guts to make. A film set during the Russian Civil War, made at the height of Soviet power, that basically depicts both sides of the conflict as ruthless, bloodthirsty, brutal, and senseless, had to have pissed off a lot of powerful people in Jancso's backyard. As a remonstration (that is apparently not a word) of war, this film succeeds admirably. Anyone who watches this and sees glory in the mindless bloodshed is already inclined toward war; the rest of us feel soul-emptying horror as we watch men callously herd captives about, execute them at random, and then march off to fight a line of men that just guns them down.
The film itself captures all…
One of the few truly anti-war pictures. Jancso's masterful direction keeps you enthralled.
The Red and the White paints war as utter chaos.It is a nihilistic, bleak and violent picture.
The movie is very political driven to show that war is meaningless and can sometimes be confusing to see which side is really the “good” guy and which is not. The movie demonstrates this characteristic by being confusing for the viewer to follow. There is no central character and the death of many people occur just for the country they are from.
This turbulence is beautifully offset by Jancso’s fluently flowing long takes -- which is one of his attributes -- making the gaze of the camera something like an…
Set during the Russian Civil War and concentrated on an area defined by hills and dense woodland overlooking the Volga river, The Red and the White explores the mechanisms of power conceptually as its characters serve political statuses with no individual agency.
Written and directed by Miklós Jancsó, It's an impressive minimalist anti-war film. It accounts Hungarian Communists generally supporting the 'Red' revolutionaries in conflict with the 'White' counter-revolutionaries for control of the region. There's some magnificent cinematography from Tamás Somló which is impressive equally on both a visual and technical breadth, and the camera chiefly classifies the characters crusades for superiority as an endless rotation of increase and loss.
It delivers a vast amount of elegiac and stylistic virtuosity…
War as a theatrical hellscape with ideology serving as just a motor for the violent tableaux.
80/100
Second viewing, last seen 2006. Emblematic moment occurs just a dozen or so minutes in, when the officer with the Fu Manchu mustache who appears to be a potential protagonist suddenly stops dead while facing the camera, throws his rifle aside, starts to disrobe, then leaps to his apparent death—all without our having yet seen or even heard what prompted this behavior. Every subsequent power shift feels just as casual and arbitrary, but it still takes a while to grasp that we're to be given no identification figure of any kind, that we're more or less watching a Slackerized portrait of the Russian Civil War (with an emphasis on the particularly dazed experience of Hungarian irregulars). Some "characters" are…
War is an invitation to disorder, to catastrophe, to confusion. Csillagosok, katonák is a flawless statement on the futility of war and how it becomes a destructive force that can overcome the ideals of any military or idealistic side. Through dreamlike sequences, Miklós Jancsó introduces us to a world plagued by ironic events with a tone of criticism throughout, where military ranks are meaningless and the final outcomes are absolutely chaotic and uncontrollable. It makes a non-linear and sometimes unrelated transition between characters as if they were independent pieces of an anarchich system, and the result is one of the best anti-war testaments ever made.
I have heard complaints in the past regarding how the indifferent scope of the atrocities…
I have a sneaking suspicion that Miklos Jancso and Tamas Somlo just might be my favorite cinematic tag team. And, I've only watched two of their collaborations, The Round-Up and The Red and the White.
Jancso and Somlo team up, once again, for a veritable visual feast of black and white long takes wherein most (if not all) of the action resides in the periphery. The camera, slow-moving yet concentrated with its focus, even though that focus tends to be relayed off endlessly throughout; gliding back and forth, pulling in and out of the (in)action of the Russian Civil War the camera seems to play the role of the war flag. Its focus tethered to a soldier, whether it be…
So this is labeled as a war comedy... I got the war aspect not as much the comedy unless to say war is a farce and no one truly wins and that is still more sad than funny. This all be said I get the appeal to this with this dry steady panning camera that seems to swing like a pendulum from scene to scene never giving you a true emotional connection to any character because all is fleeting with maybe just the last image pointing out the banality of humans in wartime and there worth during it. I kept struggling to piece together the story of this battle but realized that it exists to point out that it is pointless. I think it looks very good and it is well stylized but it didn't suck me in it's swaying demeanor still glad to say I have seen it and it gives you a lot to mentally chew on.
War is hell, this we know. But what if I told you it was also visually beautiful?
Jancso further develops the long takes employed in The Round-Up, and along with the increase in technical ambition comes a similar escalation in thematic and perspective depth communicated with these methods. By remaining behind when the seeming focal character of a shot leaves the frame and ultimately following different people, the long takes become not merely feats of choreography but elegant illustrations of how the Hungarians caught in the middle between an exploding Russian civil war have no idea who might be friend or foe (or, more accurately, mildly tolerant foe or belligerently liquidating one). The film is definitely anti-czar, depicting the White Army from the opening shot of callous, indifferent manhunting as a monstrous force, but as the camera moves back and forth between characters in a never-ending race for survival, Jancso silently, but defiantly, argues that the only real collectivism that the new Bolshevik order is bringing to those caught up in the frenzy is suffering.
81/100
Jancsó's staging and compositions are again masterful. His long takes are unmatched. The camera movement with long takes is always fluid but it's also fixed/specific when it needs to be. He always hits the right balance which makes you feel like you're there in person and observing the atrocities of war unfold right in front of your eyes and sometimes from a safe distance.