Synopsis
A truly great motion picture.
In 1840s New York, the uneventful and boring days of the daughter of a wealthy doctor come to an end when she meets a dashing poorer man — who may or may not be after her inheritance.
Directed by William Wyler
In 1840s New York, the uneventful and boring days of the daughter of a wealthy doctor come to an end when she meets a dashing poorer man — who may or may not be after her inheritance.
L'Ereditiera, 사랑아 나는 통곡한다, 상속녀, L'ereditiera, L'Héritière, Die Erbin, La heredera, Η Κληρονόμος, Спадкоємниця, Tarde Demais, 女继承人, Наследница, Наследницата, Dědička, Moștenitoarea, 女相続人, L'hereva, Perijätär, Arvtagerskan, Dziedziczka, היורשת, 女繼承人
I love the slow subtlety of Olivia de Havilland’s character arc in The Heiress, particularly in the way she changes her voice in the progression of the film. Her high, shy delivery slowly shifts into something lower, more purposeful, more confident. The mistreatment of her character is maddening in so many ways, even more so because of the fact that so many viewers see themselves in her, myself included. She’s awkward, imperfect, and her worth is wholly underestimated by everyone, but that makes her eventual transformation all the more gratifying. Olivia’s Academy Award was so well-deserved.
(This is a random observation, but another thing I like about this film is how it doesn’t glam up its stars with heavy, 40s makeup. No dark lipstick. No big eyelashes. And you can actually see Olivia’s dark circles come through. So many Old Hollywood period pieces just stick with modern makeup trends with no consideration of the time period or the characters.)
3.8/5
This review may contain spoilers. I can handle the truth.
"He's grown greedier over the years. Before he only wanted my money; now he wants my love as well. Well, he came to the wrong house - and he came twice. I shall see that he does not come a third time. I can be very cruel. I have been taught by masters." WIG MISSINGGGGG.
This review may contain spoilers. I can handle the truth.
I always enjoy when a mustache is used as a plot device to signal time passing. timestache.
Olivia’s voice drops six octaves in the last half hour and never turns back it’s called ACTINg
Wow. Went in to the Stanford Theatre expecting nothing more than a classic Hollywood romance starring Olivia De Havilland. Came out, my soul thoroughly licked from the beating William Wyler gave it, my brain dazzled by both the film's sharp critique of the patriarchy and its humane understanding of people's knotty intentions. No one in a Wyler film is a villain; they all have their faults. And yet De Havilland as Henry James’s Catherine may play the most wrongfully wronged woman that classical cinema has ever conjured up, just as Monty Clift may be one of the most ambiguous chestnuts—tough to crack, a mystery unto himself.
I cried during the scene where Liv and Monty have a jig at Liv's…
This review may contain spoilers. I can handle the truth.
Was miffed enough by the total unavailability of Olivia de Havilland's best film on streaming services that I ordered the Criterion Blu the day she died. I'm glad I did. She's astoundingly good in tracking the emotional progression of a wallflower who blooms at the attention of a gold-digging suitor and wilts into cool resolve when she's betrayed. William Wyler made great movies for adults. This one had a perfectly elegant and uncompromising ending.
Masterpiece. Such refined, simple cinematic language. And that killer ending. It’s perfect.
olivia de havilland's arc in this movie was so unexpected and welcome!!! (extremely evident that a woman co-wrote this story!) what a powerhouse performance this is for her. also aaron copland went so hard on this score oh my god the DRAMA!
loved montgomery clift reappearing with a mustache (to show that time had passed)
“yes, i can be very cruel. i have been taught by masters.”
This is absolutely grim, and even more powerful. I guess I’m a Wyler kind of guy, the way he devastates and ultimately lifts it into something deeply unexpected. Released in 1949 and based on Washington Square, the 1880 novel by Henry James, we witness the birth of a woman, shedding those who bring pain, who let her down and betray her – her father, the widower Dr. Sloper (Ralph Richardson) and Morris (Montgomery Clift), the man she loves. Olivia de Havilland delivers a magnificent performance, moving from anxious clumsiness, painfully absorbing all the belittling narratives about her, to quiet grace and strength – and, on that path, in…
80/100
Second viewing, last seen 1995. Man, this is just brutal—arguably more so than its source (meaning James, not the play; I know only the former), which concludes with polite resolve rather than ice-cold retribution. "How is it possible to protect such a willing victim?" Dr. Sloper wonders aloud at one point, ultimately deciding that only an act of deliberate cruelty will suffice; Richardson does a magnificent job of subtly delineating the difference between love and respect, creating a portrait of a man who genuinely and correctly seeks to protect his daughter but can't perceive that the cure will be more destructive than the ostensible disease. (Crucially, Aunt Lavinia is under no illusions about Townsend's character but supports the marriage…
New York, 1840. Catherine Sloper, bland, shy and repressed heiress, is courted by a handsome young man who intends to marry her. Her tyrannical father, who considers the suitor just a fortune hunter, strongly opposes the relationship. William Wyler realizes, with the help of screenwriters Ruth and Augustus Goetz, a superb adaptation of Henry James' famous novel, where the scenes - exemplary in precision and accuracy - follow one another with fluidity, elegance and narrative effectiveness. The meticulous reconstruction of the image that characterizes The Heiress, in fact, is always functional to represent the multiple psychological nuances of the protagonists, played by a trio of actors in a state of grace. Olivia de Havilland, Oscar winner for this role, is…