Synopsis
Fannie Hurst's best selling novel of today's tormented generation!
In 1940s New York, a white widow who dreams of being on Broadway has a chance encounter with a black single mother, who becomes her maid.
Directed by Douglas Sirk
In 1940s New York, a white widow who dreams of being on Broadway has a chance encounter with a black single mother, who becomes her maid.
Lana Turner John Gavin Juanita Moore Sandra Dee Susan Kohner Robert Alda Dan O'Herlihy Karin Dicker Terry Burnham John Vivyan Lee Goodman Ann Robinson Troy Donahue Sandra Gould David Tomack Joel Fluellen Jack Weston Billy House Maida Severn Than Wyenn Peg Shirley Mahalia Jackson Bess Flowers Frank Baker Alex Ball George Barrows Chet Brandenburg Teddy Buckner George Calliga Show All…
Imitação da Vida, Zolang Er Mensen Zijn, Mirage de la vie, 슬픔은 그대 가슴에, Odeio Minha Mãe, Solange es Menschen gibt, Lo specchio della vita, Imitación a la vida, Látszatélet, חיקוי לחיים, Zehirli hayat, Імітація життя, Имитация жизни, 春风秋雨, 春風秋雨, Zwierciadło życia, تقلید زندگی, Imitación de la vida, Imitació de la vida, 悲しみは空の彼方に, Suurinta elämässä, Den stora lögnen, Imitacija života
93/100
Douglas Sirk is a master of feeling, and Imitation of Life is no exception. Viewing a Sirk film is like knowingly diving into a kiddie pool, embracing its mush and melodrama, but as soon as you hit the water, its depths are unexpected and gorgeously profound. Never have I seen a film tackle a traditional rise/fall narrative and switch character perspectives continuously, and it results in a lovely piece of schmaltz that feels less like a character study and more like a mosaic of people and relationships.
This widening view of family flourishes when paired with its racial and social underpinnings, and the discussion of cutthroat showbiz also meshes well with the typical Sirk theme of buried turmoil in…
There's something a little icky in the experience of watching Douglas Sirk's Imitation of Life. Part of it, I think, is how difficult it is to escape the sneaking suspicion of exploitation that comes with a major Hollywood studio centering a Black actor purely to celebrate the sacrifice and suffering of the character they play. Juanita Moore gives a masterful performance as the forever supportive, giving Annie, but despite it being gussied up by screen time, a spectacular funeral, and a richly deserved Oscar nomination, it's nevertheless a very familiar role, one that calls to mind the well-worn, ferociously racist 'Mammy' figure of plantation fiction, described by Jessie W. Parkhurst in 1938 as (deep breath): "self-respecting, independent, loyal, forward, gentle,…
''How do you tell a child that she was born to be hurt?''
Well with this, my second Douglas Sirk film after All That Heaven Allows, I can recognise the intuitive gaze of a man of European descent, and how he saw American society and dutifully applied bitter critique and social commentary to the Hollywood studio film, which is probably quite telling as to why his films were not received quite as well upon release as the rapturous reappraisal that has existed ever since.
1959's Imitation of Life is almost epic in scope, both with vast amount of characters it explores and the weighty issues it examines with race, class, gender and capitalism at the forefront. What some would label…
sirk spends so much time allowing his characters to articulate their hopes and dreams, their contradictions and flaws; it's an act of pure artistic generosity. there's a genuine love for all of these people that takes the story beyond stereotypes and into a heightened social 'realism' that exudes hollywood glam while never denying the systemic social issues that oppress women and particularly women of color. affected me tremendously; susan kohner's performance here is monumental, to say the least. i couldn't stop crying.
i just wanna throw myself against the wall and sob in technicolor while wearing a housedress
Imitation of Life is both a tragedy and a celebration of our differences as human beings and the challenges that come with age and maturity. Sirk understands how to combine the chic, bubblegum, eye-popping style with citations of suburbia and racism, ensuring that the moments of disparity and nuisance are brought together with hope and relatability. With every misfortune there’s also a moment of relief, these people are living in a world with non-stop gratification and endless emotions.
This review may contain spoilers. I can handle the truth.
I finished watching the second half of this movie for the third class in a row this morning. My students at Tisch today were angry, ashen. What could I say to them? In the 8am class, I was in tears throughout a lot of the film. Every time Sarah Jane or her mother spoke I had to choke back a gasp. The funeral was more moving than anytime I’d ever experienced it. But in this screening, my usual ironic antagonism towards Suzie turned into a real revulsion. My students, I could tell, were moved. The 9:30am class was more reserved, as usual. As always, I wondered, can they just not connect anymore, in this age of irony, with Sirk’s unusual…
"How do you explain to your child that she was born to be hurt?"
It's instructive to see this and the 1934 versions as reflecting the same core themes through the radically different prisms of their eras. The '34 film, truer to the book, is bound to Depression-era economic survivalism and solidarity, finding an avenue toward some degree of reconciliation between white and Black single mothers through financial stability. By the same token, it is difficult to tell whether Delilah's recipe and likeness being used by Beatrice (and Delilah forgoing her fair share of the profits to enjoy a life of domesticity under Beatrice's validating whiteness) is a relic of mammy stereotypes or a tacit acknowledgement of the limits of…
Maybe I'm just really emotional today, or maybe this movie is a crazy journey, but this was really emotional.
My first experience with a Douglas Sirk melodrama was All That Heaven Allows, where I felt that the characters blew things out of proportion and the characters over-dramatized minor issues. This movie I felt exactly the opposite. Douglas Sirk's glossy style mimics Lora's wealthy, pristine life and exists to contrast the genuine struggles with racism and classism that Annie and Sarah-Jane are experiencing.
Juanita Moore is INCREDIBLE! Her and Douglas Sirk are deconstructing the Mamie role, in a way that I was not expecting for the 50s. Reminding me of Roma at times, Annie is very much a part of the…
"oh mother, stop acting. stop trying to shift people around as if they were pawns on a stage".
routine as performance. something like an aegis of formal control, sirk orchestrates a circus of appearances and illusions just to show us how fragile everything actually is, in the end we are all prisoners to culture, be it through artifice or through social oppression itself. a colossal, bitter take on the performances and masks in which we trap ourselves in order of resisting what surrounds us.
"How do you explain to your child she was born to be hurt?" (I nominate this for Best Screenplay Ever.)
Watched this with a great friend instead of the Oscars. Choice well made. No regrets. A melodrama masterpiece for this time, for all times. I will never not be in tears by the end.
The sudden swing in Lana Turner's hip when she sees Jack Gavin for the first time as a full-grown w-o-m-a-n.
Jack Gavin's marvelous ascot on a day-trip. Everything Juanita Moore touches. Every time I heard my grandma yell "Oh mama!" in an impersonation of something I couldn't place; the sense of recognition when I finally arrived at this film. And Mahalia, of course.