Skip to main content
Log in

Invasive arterial pressure monitoring: much more than mean arterial pressure!

  • Special Issue Insight
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

References

  1. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40:1795–1815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Esper SA, Pinsky MR (2014) Arterial waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 28:363–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2014.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakker J, Kattan E, Annane D et al (2021) Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06595-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger T, Green J, Horeczko T et al (2013) Shock index and early recognition of sepsis in the Emergency Department: pilot study. West J Emerg Med 14:168–174. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2012.8.11546

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Münzberg M et al (2013) The Shock Index revisited - a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU®. Crit Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12851

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT et al (2014) A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 370:1683–1693. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1401602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamzaoui O, Teboul JL (2019) Importance of diastolic arterial pressure in septic shock: PRO. J Crit Care 51:238–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.10.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ospina-Tascón GA, Hernandez G, Alvarez I et al (2020) Effects of very early start of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock: a propensity score-based analysis. Crit Care 24:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2756-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kattan E, Bakker J, Estenssoro E, Ospina-Tascón GA, Biasi Cavalcanti A, De Backer D, Vieillard-Baron A, Teboul JL, Castro RHG (2022) Hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial study protocol. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 34:1–11. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.202200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ospina-Tascón GA, Teboul JL, Hernandez G et al (2020) Diastolic shock index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Ann Intensive Care 10:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00658-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Westerhof N, Lankhaar JW, Westerhof BE (2009) The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0359-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen I, White H (1926) The relation of pulse pressure to stroke volume. Am J Physiol 78:168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marquez J, McCurry K, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR (2008) Ability of pulse power, esophageal Doppler, and arterial pulse pressure to estimate rapid changes in stroke volume in humans. Crit Care Med 36:3001–3007. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b31f0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Monnet X, Teboul JL (2018) Assessment of fluid responsiveness: recent advances. Curr Opin Crit Care 24:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Arterial line traces have been kindly provided by Mario Romano.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn Hernandez.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez, G., Messina, A. & Kattan, E. Invasive arterial pressure monitoring: much more than mean arterial pressure!. Intensive Care Med 48, 1495–1497 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06798-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06798-8