Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump nominates William Barr as attorney general

The Republican lawyer also served as attorney general during the first Bush administration.

William Barr appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee on his nomination to become attorney general at Justice Department — in 1991.
William Barr appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee on his nomination to become attorney general at Justice Department — in 1991.
William Barr appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee on his nomination to become attorney general at Justice Department — in 1991.
Bettmann Archive
Jen Kirby
Jen Kirby is a senior foreign and national security reporter at Vox, where she covers global instability.

President Donald Trump says he will nominate William Barr, a conservative lawyer and former attorney general under President George H.W. Bush, to be the next attorney general.

The president announced his pick Friday, after reports circulated that Barr was the top contender for the job. Barr served as attorney general about 25 years ago, from 1991 to 1993, and was one of the youngest people to ever hold the position at the time. His ties to a past Republican administration may benefit him in what’s sure to be a bruising confirmation fight.

Barr’s nomination comes a month after former Attorney General Jeff Sessions resigned, at Trump’s request, in November. Trump tapped Sessions’s chief of staff, Matthew Whitaker, to serve as acting attorney general, a controversial appointment that led to multiple legal challenges.

Barr will likely be tasked with carrying out Sessions’s agenda on crime and immigration — and his past stint as AG shows he might be up for the task. According to a 1992 Los Angeles Times article about his tenure, he sought to turn the Justice Department into an “agenda-setting agency from a reactive institution,” tackling violent crime, gangs, and tighter immigration controls, among other issues.

Barr’s past record as attorney general will likely be heavily scrutinized during his confirmation hearing — as will his recent comments about the Justice Department.

Barr was quoted in a New York Times article last November discussing the president’s call to the Justice Department to investigate Hillary Clinton. When asked what he would do in that situation, Barr indicated that more evidence existed to prompt an investigation into the “Uranium One” deal, a false theory that Clinton sold 20 percent of US uranium to Russia, than potential collusion into whether Trump’s campaign colluded with Russians to sway the 2016 presidential election. “To the extent it is not pursuing these matters, the department is abdicating its responsibility,” Barr said.

Trump’s nominee for attorney general also wrote an op-ed in May 2017 defending Trump’s decision to fire former FBI Director James Comey. He argued that Comey had erred in his handling of the Clinton investigation during the 2016 election, and he suggested the criticism — that Trump fired Comey to interfere with the Russia investigation — was unfounded.

Barr reasoned that those leading the investigation in the Justice Department, and the career prosecutors and FBI agents on the case, would allow the probe to continue unimpeded. “Comey’s removal simply has no relevance to the integrity of the Russian investigation as it moves ahead,” Barr wrote.

Barr’s reaction to Comey’s ouster came before the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. Senators will press Barr at the confirmation hearings about his stance on Mueller, since he’s set to take control of probe.

More in Politics

Podcasts
Pete Hegseth preaches “maximum lethality.” What has that meant in Iran?Pete Hegseth preaches “maximum lethality.” What has that meant in Iran?
Podcast
Podcasts

How Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump are waging war in Iran.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
We have no idea if Iran can still build a bombWe have no idea if Iran can still build a bomb
Politics

The central goal of the war is nowhere near a resolution.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
The political transformation of college grads is weirder than you thinkThe political transformation of college grads is weirder than you think
Politics

The laptop class is moving left — but not out of economic desperation.

By Eric Levitz
Politics
The war is on hold. But the economy is still in danger.The war is on hold. But the economy is still in danger.
Politics

The best-case scenario for the Iran crisis is still pretty bad.

By Eric Levitz
The Logoff
The ceasefire is already getting shakyThe ceasefire is already getting shaky
The Logoff

The status of US-Iran negotiations, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
It should be much easier to remove the president from officeIt should be much easier to remove the president from office
Politics

The 25th Amendment chatter is pointless — but it shouldn’t be.

By Ian Millhiser