The Common Life

    A living-room, the catholic area you
    (Thou, rather) and I may enter
    without knocking, leave without a bow, confronts
    each visitor with a style,

    a secular faith: he compares its dogmas
    with his, and decides whether
    he would like to see more of us. (Spotless rooms
    where nothing's left lying about

    chill me, so do cups used for ash-trays or smeared
    with lip-stick: the homes I warm to,
    though seldom wealthy, always convey a feeling
    of bills being promptly settled

    with cheques that don't bounce.) There's no We at an instant,
    only Thou and I, two regions
    of protestant being which nowhere overlap:
    a room is too small, therefore,

    if its occupants cannot forget at will
    that they are not alone, too big
    if it gives them any excuse in a quarrel
    for raising their voices. What,

    quizzing ours, would Sherlock Holmes infer? Plainly,
    ours is a sitting culture
    in a generation which prefers comfort
    (or is forced to prefer it)

    to command, would rather incline its buttocks
    on a well-upholstered chair
    than the burly back of a slave: a quick glance
    at book-titles would tell him

    that we belong to the clerisy and spend much
    on our food. But could he read
    what our prayers and jokes are about, what creatures
    frighten us most, or what names

    head our roll-call of persons we would least like
    to go to bed with? What draws
    singular lives together in the first place,
    loneliness, lust, ambition,

    or mere convenience, is obvious, why they drop
    or murder one another
    clear enough: how they create, though, a common world
    between them, like Bombelli's

    impossible yet useful numbers, no one
    has yet explained. Still, they do
    manage to forgive impossible behavior,
    to endure by some miracle

    conversational tics and larval habits
    without wincing (were you to die,
    I should miss yours). It's a wonder that neither
    has been butchered by accident,

    or, as lots have, silently vanished into
    History's criminal noise
    unmourned for, but that, after twenty-four years,
    we should sit here in Austria

    as cater-cousins, under the glassy look
    of a Naples Bambino,
    the portrayed regards of Strauss and Stravinsky,
    doing British cross-word puzzles,

    is very odd indeed. I'm glad the builder gave
    our common-room small windows
    through which no observed outsider can observe us:
    every home should be a fortress,

    equipped with all the very latest engines
    for keeping Nature at bay,
    versed in all ancient magic, the arts of quelling
    the Dark Lord and his hungry

    animivorous chimaeras. (Any brute
    can buy a machine in a shop,
    but the sacred spells are secret to the kind,
    and if power is what we wish

    they won't work.) The ogre will come in any case:
    so Joyce has warned us. Howbeit,
    fasting or feasting, we both know this: without
    the Spirit we die, but life

    without the Letter is in the worst of taste,
    and always, though truth and love
    can never really differ, when they seem to,
    the subaltern should be truth.
Read more →

Analysis (ai): The poem uses a mix of conversational phrasing and elevated reflection, balancing intimacy with intellectual scrutiny. Archaisms like "Thou" and "ours" evoke a formal, almost ritualistic tone, framing domestic life as a solemn covenant rather than a casual arrangement.
  • Structure and Form: Written in loose iambic lines with irregular enjambment, the poem avoids rigid meter, reflecting the tentative equilibrium of shared domesticity. The lack of stanza breaks mirrors continuity and accumulated time in a long-term relationship.
  • Domestic Symbolism: The living room functions as a metaphor for negotiated coexistence, where cleanliness, books, and bills become markers of identity and compatibility. Objects like crossword puzzles and framed musicians suggest a cultivated, insular life built on shared reference points.
  • Historical and Cultural Context: Composed mid-century, it aligns with postwar Western preoccupations with privacy, stability, and bourgeois routines. While many modernist works foreground alienation or fragmentation, this poem focuses on endurance and the quiet success of ordinary connection.
  • Relations and Isolation: The poem challenges romantic fusion, asserting that identity remains distinct—“Thou and I”—even in intimacy. The Protestant metaphor underscores individual moral responsibility within partnership, resisting collectivist or idealized visions of “We.”
  • Comparison to Other Works: Unlike Auden’s more theological or politically urgent poems, this piece dwells in the mundane, yet retains his characteristic moral precision. It extends themes from “The More Loving One” and “Lullaby,” but with less lyrical melancholy and more sardonic pragmatism.
  • Modern Concerns: It engages mid-century anxieties about conformity and domesticity, subtly questioning whether comfort leads to passivity. The preference for sitting over command echoes critiques of middle-class complacency found in postwar sociology.
  • Less-Discussed Angle: The poem’s humor and irony—especially in imagining Sherlock Holmes auditing a relationship—undermine sentimentality. This clinical detachment, treating intimacy like a case study, reveals a skepticism about love’s mystification.
  • Unconventional Faith: Domestic order replaces organized religion, with rituals like bill payment and furniture arrangement forming a secular liturgy. The “common world” resembles a constructed reality, fragile yet necessary, akin to mathematical abstractions “impossible yet useful.”
  • Survival and Defense: The home as fortress reflects Cold War-era fears of intrusion and annihilation. References to the “Dark Lord” and “chimaeras” invoke mythic battle, but the true defense lies in shared language and routine, not force.
  • Allusion and Intertextuality: Invocations of Joyce, Bombelli, and composers suggest a cultivated European mind under siege. These references are not mere ornament; they index a worldview sustained by art and intellectual continuity.
  • Final Ethical Stance: The closing lines assert a hierarchy: truth prevails when in tension with love. This is not a sentimental vision of harmony but a disciplined ethics where honesty is duty, even in intimacy.
  •  (hide)
    Read more →
    0

     

    13.0k views   +list
    Share it with your friends: 

    Make comments, explore modern poetry.
    Join today for free!

     Or Sign up with Facebook

    Top poems List all »


    Have you read these poets? List all »

    More by W H Auden

    Loading ...
    Loading...