Reply
Sun 17 Mar, 2013 12:19 pm
"Coming out" is in the news due to Senator Portman's son. I think there are many men who can not "come out" because they don't have a gay partner. It seems a bit of a farce to be technically gay without a partner. The reason for a lack of partner can be lack of physical attractiveness and lack of "personality."
Any comments?
@gollum,
same as skinny legged women dont get any.
@gollum,
Is it possible to technically be heterosexual without a partner?
<bizarre OP>
@ehBeth,
Sometimes I read some posts and I'm in awe and others I just chuckle. For me, the entertainment value of A2K may flag but the freak flag still flies high.
@ehBeth,
No, you must be having sex constantly (even while commuting, in church, or attending your child's soccer games) in order to prove your sexuality.
I knew this woman once't who was as plain as board fence. She just exuded sexuality, she had to fight 'em off with a stick. Looks ain't got nothin' to do with it.
@Setanta,
Yeah but could she sing like Jim Nabors?
She was more of an alto . . .
@Setanta,
So you're saying that she had sax appeal?
@gollum,
There's a technically gay and a nontechnically gay?
I learn something new every day!
@gollum,
Sexuality is defined by
preference, not by whom you have sex with.
@boomerang,
boomerang wrote:
There's a technically gay and a nontechnically gay?
I learn something new every day!
Sort of like technical rape and nontechnical rape.
@gollum,
gollum wrote:
"Coming out" is in the news due to Senator Portman's son. I think there are many men who can not "come out" because they don't have a gay partner. It seems a bit of a farce to be technically gay without a partner. The reason for a lack of partner can be lack of physical attractiveness and lack of "personality."
Quite right. If you're a lonely, ugly nerd, you're not gay, you're just a loser. You
wish you were gay.
@JeffreyEqualityNewma,
That's OK, don't speak... we all know what (s)he's thinking.
Why call someone a
bigot... cause it hurts?
No doubt, it's just as evident without the words.
@gollum,
My tags for this thread... just to be direct:
[
X]
Sexuality,
[
X]
Misperception,
[
X]
Political Innuendo,
[
X]
Veiled Insult
Don't you just get goosebumps listening to homophobes?
Let's see, we can read the OP as puzzling, silly, bizzare or just plain dumb, or we can read it as innuendo, veiled insult or homophobic.
Sometime a cigar is just a good smoke.
@Finn dAbuzz,
Thanks Freud.
Sometimes outdated notions of patriarchal psycho-sexual disturbances are just that.
Disturbances.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace